1 Day, 2 Scenarios and Ominous Electoral Pretext

ANALYSIS: We are 1 day out from the 2024 election with 2 remaining plausible scenarios and the emergence of very ominous electoral pretext sufficient enough to make one think, same players, same playb

We are one day out from the 2024 election with two remaining plausible scenarios and the emergence of very ominous electoral pretext sufficient enough to make one think, same players, same playbook and same play? Putting aside all of the polling [unreliable] and legacy media reporting [unreliable] to examine matters in more succinct and general terms where Occam’s customarily prevails, I have routinely asked and answered this question:

The answer to that question bears down on the events of tomorrow [05 Nov 24], when a beta-tested and refined version of the Intelligence Community operational plan from 2020 is carried-out in order to steal the 2024 election to install a nominee and presidential candidate who received exactly zero votes in the primary.

It’s important to make these considerations relative to critical factors like timing and for example:

When examining timing, it’s also imperative to examine things overlaid on the broader, longer timeline:

Those are the forces and that is the history underpinning and driving what Americans call an “election” tomorrow.

It’s a fundamentally binary point in history: 1-either “they” exercise self-preservation in order to steal another election and guarantee institutional preservation albeit Marxism as this point -OR- 2-“they” forego self-preservation, stand-down, surrender what it has taken generations to construct and procure and then permit their chief political adversary; who is holding all of the evidence, to return to the Executive with prosecutorial discretion to rightfully and justly apply the rule of law to prosecute his attackers for the actual crimes they fraudulently assigned to him before exercising constructed prosecutorial discretion in operational lawfare operations to target him; and where the sentence through due process rises to execution.

Occam’s prevails to answer our question – they’re not going to give it all back and that means they’re going to steal the election.

There’s one caveat, though; and it’s one that has been examined closely and often in the analysis.

That caveat is the remedy – the American people.

In September and exactly 43 days-out, I outlined what stood as the 5 most plausible scenarios for the outcome of the 2024 election and at one day out, two remain: 43 Days and 5 Plausible Outcome Scenarios.

The 5 most plausible scenarios are presented with the assumption that accurate and reliable pre-election polling, which is difficult to come by, indicates that Trump is positioned for an historical landslide to surpass the stolen landslide of 2020; and even pollsters and politicians on the Left summarily admit to this:

1: STEAL: Biden to Harris transition, Harris into the Executive
2: STEAL: Harris removed before inauguration day, Constitutional crisis
3: STEAL: Biden resigns late for early Harris install, Harris oversees own stolen election
4: STEAL: Successful Trump assassination permits steal, Harris into the Executive
5: NO STEAL: Trump into the Executive, IC retaliates with assassination, WWIII & massive civil unrest
[The article goes in depth to explain each]

Scenarios 3 and 4 are dismissed but we leave the door cracked for scenario 2; however, if the IC is going through such great lengths to install Harris, who benefits from “first female” and “first black female” insurance [term used to describe insulation from warranted scrutiny and criticism], there isn’t sufficient motive to remove her unless the constitutional crisis is the objective.

It stands to reason that the IC learned under Joe Biden’s [Barack Obama’s] four years that much [Cloward-Piven applications] can be accomplished under the guise of sheer and utter incompetence out in front and operational string pullers in the backdrop.

Is there a better front to continue operations dressed-up like incompetence and stupidity like a pig in lipstick than Kamala Harris, who was an operational install receiving zero votes in the primary [IC Installation of Worst Nominee in History Indicates Difficult Path Forward]?

Nope; so long as Hakeem Jeffries doesn’t ascend to the Executive, which is another plausible scenario if 2024 is stolen and along with it the House; whereby Jeffries, the current minority leader, becomes the likely Speaker and through any Continuity of Government scenario whether it be false-flag or authentic, would be one VPOTUS away from the Oval Office.

Occam’s and logical deduction leaves us with two plausible outcomes and the caveat of the American people:

Outcome 1: STEAL: Biden to Harris transition, Harris into the Executive
Outcome 5: NO STEAL: Trump into the Executive, IC retaliates with assassination, WWIII & massive civil unrest

The caveat is as fundamental to democracy as it is to the fate of the Republic:

1-AMERICANS GO TO THE POLLS TO VOTE FOR TRUMP IN SUFFICIENT NUMBERS [enough to cancel and override ballot harvesting, fraudulent ballots of different kinds (absentee, overseas military, illegal immigrant placeholders, etc.), fractional voting algorithms (in voting machines manufactured by companies like ES&S, Dominion, et al. that often contain Chinese components), rigged voting machines that prevent voting for the candidate[s] of choice (as occurred in Laurel County, KY), civil unrest or otherwise disturbances to voting locations, etc. and everything else designed to undermine a legitimate election.]

-OR-

2-INSUFFICIENT AMERICANS VOTE FOR TRUMP TO SEAL THE NATION’S FATE AS A MARXIST ONE [where insufficient voter-turn-out for Trump permitted the operational methods (described above) to be effective in producing a prescribed and constructed but slimmest of margins victory for Kamala Harris as the front for continued and accelerated operations.]

Is there evidence for the IC, et al. to steal the 2024 election and importantly, is there pretext for the operational outcomes?

In short, yes and yes.

Here’s that evidence beginning with a basic explanation of what stands to unpack beginning on election day:

Here’s the evidence to support that explanation:

At the precise time that Donald Trump publicly cited reliable polling showing a lead in the seven critical swing states [AZ, GA, MI, NV, NC, PA & WI], the DOJ intervened within a broader list of other critical states and locales under the guise of “protecting voting rights,” which it will conflate with illegal immigrants’ “right” to vote as a mechanism to permit those illegals to serve as placeholders for fraudulent ballots that will be used to back-fill the actual vote once election day counting stops.

It’s the same DOJ that has orchestrated the IC’s operational lawfare against Trump.

For those 7 critical swing states, it’s important to examine state voting laws, the timeline for the final return and any identified shift from one candidate to the other AFTER election day.

In the 7 critical swing states, where 93 of 528 electoral votes will decide the 2024 election, all 7 indicate a “slow going” process ranging somewhere between 1 day after to November 23rd for a final return and a declared presidential winner.

In that range of time in the 7 critical swing states, 6 of 7 states indicate a post-election day shift from Trump to Harris as depicted in the top illustration.

The one outlier is the highly problematic State of Georgia, where rampant election fraud occurred in 2020 and where it indicates that it’s “hard to say” who may receive the benefit of a “shift,” but where a betting man says GA falls in line with the other 6.

So far, we’ve outlined the mechanisms for the steal via the electoral vote and we’ve examined the evidence of those mechanisms as provided by the states themselves and according to state voting laws.

Here’s the propagandized pretext for it all.

The IC and its legacy media lapdog have established the pretext for another fractional post-election day theft by weaving a tale that will include unseen polling numbers for Trump in every Red state, some of the Blue states and all 7 swing states; however, it will not be sufficient in the Blue and swing states to overcome Harris; and those electoral votes will tip the election to Harris in the slimmest of margins after days-to-weeks of post-election day “vote counting” when the vote will be back-filled with fraudulent ballots.

They call it “winning with less” and you’d have to be an abject moron, functional idiot, slave or Marxist to believe a single grain of it.

Not without a sense of irony, perhaps the largest political failure in US politics – the position of Border Czar from 2021-2025 – stands as both the architect and the beneficiary:

[Source]

Do you think it’s by accident that the beneficiary and overseer of an open southern border stands to tip the election in her own favor because the percent increase in the population of illegal immigrants in the 7 critical swing states since 2021 ranges from 241%-775%; and where each of those illegals can be leveraged as a fraudulent ballot reflecting a Harris “vote”?

Since Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss, the Left has attacked and threatened to end the electoral college and in 2024, the Left will celebrate the electoral college as the delivery mechanism for Harris despite her catastrophic popularity and polling numbers.

It’s the same players, the same playbook and the same play from 2021 albeit a refined one.

The result will be the same, though, as I have reminded so often: The 2024 election was stolen in 2020, when they stole that election and then no one did anything about it.

And the expectation is that they will just give it all back without attempting to steal it again?

That’s fodder for fools, slaves and Marxists.

Either sufficient enough Americans turn-out to vote for Trump to break everything in place to make Harris the winner or Harris “wins” and we go all of the way around the corner of Marxism from which there is no return.

Pray that Americans writ large do the right thing and then pray even harder because if Trump manages to beat the house against a completely stacked deck, they are going to unleash absolute hell in retaliation with civil unrest and false-flag violence in hopes of getting the Civil War the IC wants so badly; and right up to Iran kicking off World War III.

Tomorrow marks the difficult beginning of a new era in American history and only the American people can determine if the end of that era will be equally difficult or whether it will constitute saving the Republic as the Republic was intended to be.

Pray, vote and pray again.

Of course, if you happen to be a Democrat, you will pray, vote, pray and vote and vote and vote and vote and vote and vote and vote……again.

-End-