BACKLASH COMING: SCOTUS Says Trump in for 2024, More Unavoidable Circumstances for the Intelligence Community
A backlash is coming from the Intelligence Community. It must be as the menu of of options for an effective tactical response dwindles and the fewer they become, the more ubiquitously deadly they get right up to a thermonuclear World War III. In the run-up to the start of an election year, the evidence was clear that the Intelligence Community would be required to redress the unavoidable circumstances of former President Donald Trump’s meteoric return to the center stage of American politics. Trump’s undeniable reemergence occurred against the backdrop of multifaceted IC operations to remove both Trump and President Joe Biden from the 2024 election in a complete reset of the ballot. The American people will require a giant, new piece of fat to chew on as the conversion to Marxist communism is galvanized to completion and a ballot reset will do just that. It will be like replacing the cast of the trashiest reality TV show with a new one and where the audience has been programmed over time to immerse itself in every bit of it.
On Monday, 04 Mar 24, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion on Trump’s access to the 2024 ballot after states like Colorado removed him citing the 14th Amendment and the predication of a fraudulent “insurrection” at the US Capitol that was a clear IC entrapment operation.
SCOTUS ruled:
For the reasons given, responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States. The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand.
All nine Members of the Court agree with that result. Our colleagues writing separately further agree with many of the reasons this opinion provides for reaching it.
[…]
The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court is reversed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
It is so ordered.
US Supreme Court in re: No. 23–719 DONALD J. TRUMP, PETITIONER v. NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL.
[Link]
Informed by abundant evidence, it is assumed that the IC has at best known and at worst anticipated that SCOTUS would rule accordingly and therefore, it is assumed that the IC’s quiver contains operations in reserve and or contingency operations for this scenario.
Of course, such IC operations envelop both civil and criminal lawfare operations against Trump et al and for example Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Letitia James, et al.
The indicators for the IC backlash in response to SCOTUS and unavoidable circumstances are timely: Biden’s Disapproval Rating Soars To 59%, Trump’s Lead Biggest Yet.
Remember what the IC is doing with Biden; however, and why the analysis as been focused on the IC’s orchestrated exit of the President beginning with the Penn Biden Center construct over a year ago.
The IC is compartmentalizing the internally controlled demolition of the US [Cloward-Piven strategy] within Biden’s four years, which occurred under Barack Obama’s direction and have equated to his 4th term.
Obama’s 3rd term occurred under DJT and his 5th and 6th will be delivered by Michelle as Joe’s replacement for 2024 [or it’s CA Governor, Gavin Newsom].
This explains why we currently see pretext narrative from the establishment complaining about the “permanent president” they fear from the unavoidable circumstances of Donald J. Trump, when in reality this is pure political projection [assigning attribution for ones own misdeeds and criminality to ones adversary as a deflection point construct]:
Obama is the “permanent president” as the analysis here has long contended and the projection is nauseating.
Remember when Obama promised to “fundamentally transform” the US before he entered office in January 2009?
Making himself the “permanent president” was the design.
The IC is managing Biden as Obama’s functionary and China’s proxy under the guise of his feebleness, diminished capacity, dementia, etc., to permit and explain away the designed damage, destruction and death caused in application of Cloward-Piven strategy.
Once fully and finally attributed to Biden and therefore compartmentalized within Biden, the IC will flush all of that designed damage, destruction and death with him.
Removing Biden and precluding Trump results in the ballot reset and once the shiny, new trinket nominees are in place, it will be the equivalent of pointing and shouting “squirrel” to a class of kindergartners.
Off the American public will go chewing on the giant piece of juicy new fat tossed its way.
The fat is normally delicious enough to make its consumers forget the past in lieu of the same old and worn-out false promises of a better future.
There’s a fine line separating reality and realistic optimism and its drawn with the ink of deceit.
SCOTUS has interfered to disrupt the IC’s plans and now the backlash is expected.
In mid-January, I examined eight options for the IC as food for thought here: Eight Options to Deal with Teflon Don.
The options included:
A clean slate [ballot reset]
Another pandemic
Another stolen election
Another impeachment[s]
Another Civil War
Another World War
A military coup
A cyber attack [and/or EMP]
The most effective recipe is a combination or sequence of combinations of those 8 options and others.
Each of the options is highly plausible and the momentum to “another World War” has the most evidentiary traction by far recalling these things:
Biden’s foreign policy shift away from Trump’s appropriate hyper-focus on China/CCP and back to favorite NATO boogeyman Russia was first identified and reported on back on 19 Dec 20: CRITICAL: The Pending Pivot Back to Russia.
Since then, the aggregate analysis evidences our incremental march to that war: WAR, FAMINE & DISEASE.
The analysis contains a designed loss by the US in handover to Globalists leveraging a diplomatically and militarily aligned Russia/China [Syria, Iran, Iraq, et al.] caused by a Biden White House national security advisor reversing established Pentagon positions: ALARMING: WHITE HOUSE’S ABRUPT REVERSAL OF POSITIONS – Every American Should Read and Come to Understand the White House’s Disingenuous and Newly Fabricated Position on the Multiple-Front War Precisely Predicted Long Ago.
As positioned on 06 May 20, since no later than August 2019, the US has been embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war against China that aligns with China’s hegemonic and military doctrine; especially its preferred and doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare.
The IC is a co-conspirator in everything above serving as the spine of it all on the US side.
Now, consider the following.
Why is the US acquiring $1 TRILLION in debt every 100 days unless it is to collapse the financial and economic system on the same political continuum and its underpinning timeline; including the designed and incremental march to World War III: Why They Are Creating $1 Trillion Of Debt Every 100 Days.
Examine the shape of the data line above.
In my first professional career, I examined cases of fraud for law firms and insurance companies where a cardinal rule and hallmark indicator for fraud is the appearance of data lines shaped like hockey sticks; and for further example:
The data line gives the appearance of intent sans even a modicum of fiscal responsibility.
Consider that the generational timeline underpinning the present is the same one that reaches as far back as the WWII era at the latest; and it results in generational and dynastic control, which is why I branded this political continuum ‘Dynastic Bush.’
The operators on this political continuum tend to rely on mechanisms they have deemed reliable from consistent use over time.
A perfect and recent example to evidence this reliance is the rehashing of “Russian collusion” in advance of SCOTUS’ known or anticipated opinion and in service to the World War III narrative focused on forever NATO ‘boogeyman’ Russia:
“Russian collusion” worked the first time as the predicate to begin removing a sitting president, which started before he was ever elected, and so history tells us they will use it again, which they clearly are as just evidenced.
The fit of the political and war narratives is hand in glove.
Moreover, consider energy as a critical factor to national security and national defense and where the lesson is framed by the history World War II, Japan’s dwindling petroleum reserves that the US was strictly surveilling and the attack on Pearl Harbor, which was permitted to happen to allow for entry into the war thus explaining why the bulk of the Pacific fleet was out to sea averting the known incoming attack:
Why is China’s proxy Joe Biden emptying critical US petroleum reserves on a timeline that comports with an election, which also comports with the timeline for an evidenced march to World War III?
Unless, of course, it’s a direct measure to facilitate the designed loss in that war that I began analyzing and evidencing several years ago.
In between that analysis and now is the march.
History repeats itself especially for people indoctrinated in the public school system controlled by the same people determined to wage war and where the latter doesn’t teach anything that matters to the former.
Blind slaves make the best slaves and that only applies to the survivors of war; and that includes biowarfare and mRNA injections.
World War III is a perfect remedy for the unavoidable circumstance of Donald J. Trump.
It’s also reasonable to believe that the initial backlash from the Intelligence Community stands to be new criminal or civil litigation, aggravating revelations or developments, or the beginning of new operations previously in reserve in the quiver.
If the IC stays true to form, it could be a combination of those or a sequence of combinations.
One thing is for certain, though.
A backlash is coming.
And so is a reckoning for the American people.
-End-
Authority without accountability always corrupts. Without transparency, their will always be a justified excuse for an abuse of power. Think on how many times a satellite was retasked to stalk an ex-wife on the micro-level, or innocent civilians murdered to conceal illegal government activities (KAL007, Murder On The Tracks in Mena, AR) on the macro-level. This is not limited to the military. In the 1980s how many War on Drugs stings and shootouts were between DEA agents? I was taught in my pre-law course that 80% of the drug trade was by supposed DEA sting operations.
I cannot refute your analysis, repugnant as this truth is.