“Big Boy” Biden Rekindles War or Threat of War Position

ANALYSIS: Joey Biden rekindles “war or threat of war” considerations in his BIG BOY press conference.

Jul 12, 2024

In the aftermath of the Joe Biden “Big Boy” live press conference that was as delightfully dreadful as anticipated for the clearly demented and neurologically impaired proxy for Barack Obama, China and an entire cohort of Amerikan Marxists, a high-value face card has been turned-over causing us to revisit a previous position put forth on 01 Mar 23. Our goal remains to examine the evidence in order to identify indicators to accurately project forward. The projection will reveal if the Intelligence Community’s proxy war against Russia in Ukraine is a component of an orchestrated march to a broader thermonuclear World War III or whether it serves in the capacity of the “threat of war” catalyst that is driving a massive global money and weapons laundering hub where in the US, the levels of international corruption and criminality rise to the level of treason.

To watch the full press conference:

Let’s set the table.

[This chronological review provides the necessary contextual backdrop to the “war or threat of war” considerations. Readers familiar with the content may wish to skim or skip ahead.]

CHRONOLOGY & CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP

[For a more robust chronology: Timeline/Graphics.]

In early January 2020, the analysis assumed a unique position to put forth that the viral outbreak in China that was first announced on 27 Dec 19 was in fact a false flag political construct with architecture that was patently enterprise fraud prosecutable under RICO statute.

Although a lag in mortality and infection data slowed the empirical analysis for several months, it did not impact it from an anecdotal standpoint.

By early February 2020, the first viral outbreak specific article was written to begin laying-out the evidence underpinning the analysis.

Two days later, the viral outbreak was branded “COVID-19” on 11 Feb 20 and that nomenclature entered our language for the first time.

By March 2020 and the day after the pandemic declaration, I wrote a piece asking if “COVID-19” is a “global 9/11” to intensely examine the hypothesis in ways that began identifying and examining the lower hanging fruit in working back up towards the trunk of a patently fraudulent tree.

By early May 2020, the analysis was further narrowed to put forth another position that at the time, stood alone: summarized, the US is embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war with China that aligns with China’s hegemonic and military doctrines; including its primary doctrinal warfare strategy of biowarfare.

The aggregate analysis was complied into the series War, Famine & Disease.

Another indicator emerged relative to the close examination of Chinese doctrine: cultural Marxism is being leveraged as the primary mechanism to pit, divide and conquer the American people in the conversion to the CCP’s brand of Marxist communism.

With obvious political overtones and in the midst of COVID lock-downs, these positions and analysis actually permitted the accurate projection of the George Floyd riots about three weeks in advance; although knowing the actual context of these operations was impossible:

As spring rolled into summer, the nation continued to be pitted, divided and conquered; this time in remembrance of a common criminal and felon by the name of George Floyd; and so that it could properly burn for the coming “build back better” solution.

*Link

That would, of course, require a stolen 2020 election, which is exactly what occurred and COVID-19, which was obfuscated by the cover of the first impeachment of Donald Trump during its initial roll-out, was the primary theft mechanism.

*Link

Perfect practice makes perfect and so Ukraine would serve the Intelligence Community’s operations in reciprocating fashion to accomplish multiple objectives.

This applies to the initial roll-out of operations in the US best represented by Obama’s map-over of the architecture found in the US Counterinsurgency Manual in application to the US beginning in 2009: Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine and the COVID-19 Blueprint to Overthrow America and Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine: A Closer Look at the Guide.

Once the architecture was in place, a trial run was required before application to the US.

Enter Ukraine.

The Intelligence Community honed its color revolution skill set in Ukraine before taking the 2020 election.

*Link

Ukraine is both the Keystone of Corruption and the proving grounds for the Intelligence Community’s modern era color revolutions.

With the 2020 election in hand, the incoming Biden Administration got right to work to begin Obama’s third and arguably fourth term, if we count his derailment of Trump’s first term as his third.

In December 2020, the incoming Biden Administration issued a foreign policy change that instantly raised red flags in the analysis to signal an about face in returning to the post-World War II policy of NATO encroachment on Russian national sovereignty.

It marked a return to painting Russia as a NATO “boogeyman” to justify military action against it.

From that late December 2020 announcement, the incremental march to WWIII began but would it be for actual “war or threat of war?”

The analysis put forth three war theaters: Russia/Ukraine, China/Taiwan/South China Sea and the Middle East/Iran/Iraq/Syria, et al.

By March 2021, another unique projection was put forth that would come to fruition in historically unprecedented ways in the beginning of December 2022.

March 2021 analysis laid-out how Russia and China would put aside decades of opposition and rivalry to align diplomatically and militarily to rival the US, NATO and their allies in the identified war theaters.

Twenty months later in early December 2022, that alignment happened extending through the present: NATO Fire Stoking Unifying China and Russia Militarily in Projected Doomsday Scenario.

By March 2023, the analysis positioned this, which is the basis of our considerations today in light of new evidence : War or Threat of War? Either Way It’s a Massive Money and Weapons Laundering Operation.

WAR OR THREAT OF WAR?

It’s important to attach some form of time marker to any kinetic flashpoint to begin a projected World War III and based on the timeline underpinning the assassination attempt on President Reagan, the analysis establishes that marker in a range of 05 Nov 23 +/- 3 months.

Succinctly, the March 2023 analysis, which is a good read to supplement what is laid-out here, put it like this: “Over time, we’ve seen narrative creep suggesting that the NATO/Western Empire war in Ukraine is going to be a long-lasting one as opposed to one going kinetic in the shorter term. Given the evidenced levels of unprecedented corruption, money laundering and weapons trafficking/laundering occurring there, it is possible that the manufactured war exists only for those purposes but therein, we cannot account for China and her desires to recapture Taiwan at the most optimal time when a beleaguered America is exhausted and depleted in Ukraine.”

Other pieces in the corpus of analysis examine the same secondary “threat of war” position, but nowhere near the volume dedicated to the primary position, which is everyone’s worst nightmare: an actual global thermonuclear war; even if its only purpose in a limited strike [translates to “just enough as needed”] is to hasten the final handover of the US to Globalists leveraging international assets like the United Nations/WHO, Iran and China and domestic assets like the Intelligence Community, Department of State and the Executive, Judiciary and Legislative, as the basis for post-war treaty negotiations that will be facilitated by the UN and put to paper the actual handover.

The analysis goes on to say: “Meanwhile and not discounting the human toll, the financial toll for the manufactured war in Ukraine, which speaks to the money and weapons laundering positions, stands to exceed the total cost of the war in Afghanistan. Reporting indicates that “since the beginning of the war and as of Jan. 15, 2023, $46.6 billion in financial aid for military purposes has flowed to the country.””

*Image featured in the March 2021 analysis.

Continuing: “With $46.6 billion already on the books, the Biden Administration more recently dispatched Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen to Kyiv at the same time it announced an additional $1.25 billion earmarked for Ukraine. All of this clouds the analysis on the prospects for kinetic war versus the threat of war as money and weapons laundering operations that are ripping-off Americans in unprecedented ways.”

Back to the primary position, the piece ends: “The broader picture remains clouded – actual kinetic war or just the threat of war to facilitate massive money and weapons laundering operations? Both are plausible and the threat of a kinetic World War III as projected in March 2021 remains highly so. Victor Davis Hanson agrees:”

A similar pre-global war lineup of the eventual adversaries is emerging in preview of a much larger, much scarier war to come [while] China believes it can be the real winner of the war...The longer this preview war goes on, the surer will follow the nightmarish main attraction.
Victor Davis Hanson

Therefore, the task becomes identifying new indicators that evidence the two opposing positions of war or threat of war.

NEW INDICATORS

In the wake of Joe Biden’s “Big Boy” press conference, the Intelligence Community appears to have turned-over a high-value face card for all to see and it serves as an indicator.

The indicator comes from John Rappaport in the context of the “October surprise” for the 2024 election and it’s a brilliantly simple detail with a perfect fit into the analysis and on the secondary position – “threat of war”: ““Peace in our time,” brought to you by the Democrats.“

This projects to be the continued escalation towards war that began in late December 2020 with an end-point of October 2024.

From the standpoint of timing, any such brokered peace agreement would fall about dead center on our 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months projection for a kinetic flashpoint.

This must be underpinned by a Joe Biden determined to hold on and remain in office, which means one thing – as soon as the 2024 election is stolen for Biden, he will be removed in short order and Kamala Harris becomes POTUS as escorted in through the backdoor as I laid out in January 2023: Kamala Harris Slipping Into the Executive Through the Back Door Is Overshadowed by Problematic Background, Ties to Bidens and CEFC China Energy Company, Intel Community Targets Pence.

*Link

Do you want to be the only person on earth between Hillary Clinton and the one thing she covets most?

I don’t.

That would be Arkancide, indeed.

Are there indicators that the play is for Biden to hold-on in this production of Intelligence Community theater?

Plenty and here’s one:

*Link

Here’s another:

*Link

Just like it’s not entirely clear whether it’s “war or threat of war”, the same holds for whether Joe Biden remains the nominee or not.

It’s highly plausible if not likely; and this has been the constant position, that Biden goes and the rest contributes to production value while galvanizing the base for what is to come.

These waters are muddy and the fog of asymmetrical war is thick by the Intelligence Community’s design.

Both are critical to the story line and the production value of the Intelligence Community’s kabuki theater.

“Will it be a fake tug-of-war where Biden plays the role of a nominee intending to stay put while pulling against a base and leadership that wants him to go; and where he’ll bail at the last second if not sooner? Or will it be DNC hi-jinks where rules are bent, broken, rewritten or discarded altogether to install a candidate because the Left always justifies the means with the ends? It doesn’t matter except for the entertainment value. It only matters that Joe is going and he started packing 18 months ago.”

That’s how this article ended and it remains the safest bet: Enjoy the Show. Biden Compartmentalized for the Flush.

Otherwise it’s President Harris through the back door.

If it is to be President Harris, the more likely it is that it’s threat of war over war.

That said, it’s not enough to disrupt the current momentum beyond ripples.

Until the current momentum that clearly has us on an articulated and incremental trajectory to World War III that began with a foreign policy change by the incoming Biden Administration in late December 2020; and the resulting NATO proxy war against Russia as aggravated by China/Taiwan considerations and ongoing war in the Middle East, is interceded on, it unfortunately remains the most likely outcome.

Perhaps we’ll be surprised in October when it’s plausible that we’re standing on the precipice of World War III and where that war is brought to a peaceful pre-war resolution in preparation to steal the 2024 election for Big Boy Joey, but really Kamala Harris, or some other DNC nominee [Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton or Gavin Newsom, in that order.]

Until then, allow these new developments to deepen our understanding [plus a BIG BOY BONUS at the end].