Enterprise Fraud and Treason in Lockstep as the Carve-out for #FalseFlagFauci Continues: Department of Energy Driving Lab Leak Narrative

The 107th article in the WAR, FAMINE & DISEASE series focused on a Department of Energy report confirming the "lab leak" theory for the origins of COVID-19.

Let’s be crystal clear from the very outset by once again kicking dead horses kicked long ago and repeatedly since: any notion that the COVID-19 “pandemic” is something other than a deliberate and intentional construct of enterprise fraud, which was unleashed on America and the rest of the world, is itself a component of enterprise fraud. What makes the analysis at Moonshine different than quite literally anything found anywhere else is that my background is fraud. Since early January 2020, while the rest of the world was talking about a “virus” and a “pandemic,” I mounted the wild bronco of enterprise fraud and began breaking it. For a very long time, I was the only one riding that horse and I remained committed to it for a simple reason – that’s where the evidence led when examined through the pragmatic lens of common sense.

That initial analysis was entirely on the mark and remains so. Moreover, it’s also clear that the enterprise fraud and treason are in lockstep as the carve-out for COVID-19 and #FalseFlagFauci continues to be driven forward.

As an example of the depth of the work, this article pushes us closer to the 400th one I’ve written covering COVID-19 as a fraudulent construct. Many others are now saddling up to ride this horse, too, but they lack the depth and scope of insight to provide a completely cogent explanation and they certainly don’t possess the same catalog of analysis and evidence to stack-up behind it.

For one thing, I’m still the only person in America who has told you that the first fraudulent impeachment of President Donald J. Trump was the cover mechanism for the installation and unpacking of the enterprise fraud construct of COVID-19. That position was assumed in March 2020 and those timelines braided together like a rope. Tit for tat. Maneuver and counter-maneuver. Look here, fake impeachment, don’t look here, fake pandemic.

Aggravating evidence completed the picture: 1-Nancy Pelosi moving impeachment oversight from its traditional and constitutional jurisdiction in Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee to Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee [HPSCI], 2-the predication for the articles of impeachment transitioning from “Russian collusion” to a Trump phone call with Ukraine and 3-Pelosi’s rush to impeach before Christmas only to hit the breaks and refuse to transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate trial venue for over a month.

How no one else figured that out is beyond me and it only took a simple timeline overlay of the impeachment process, WHO mitigations and U.S. mitigations to identify that component; overlays being a rudimentary skill learned long ago.

Resting on the fact that the COVID-19 “pandemic” is a construct of enterprise fraud, which may be regarded as a structured box within which the fraudsters function, this box dictates the rules of the game. It shapes the playing field that is comprised of rules, policies, regulations, protocols, legislation, statutes and authority. By identifying and comprehending the box and its internal gearing, one can make accurate projections and I’ve made them over and over and over for COVID-19.

These people play inside of a box and it makes them entirely predictable, as I like to say.

In light of the aforementioned, understand what is happening relative to new reporting from the Wall St. Journal and featured at the New York Post indicating that the Department of Energy [DOE] has issued a report confirming the supposed “lab leak” theory that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] emerged from a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Succinctly, this DOE report is sowing further fraudulent narrative as a cover story and exit strategy.

The exit strategy is something I wrote about last August and it’s called a limited hangout. A limited hangout exist strategy occurs when aspects of the truth are proffered alongside a few damaging facts; the blame for which is accepted by the issuing party. This is done as a means to sell a fake bill of goods designed to altogether avoid the full-spectrum of the actual truth.

From my August article:

The pretext for this exit strategy began to drop a long while back and it’s been a slow trickle to this point. Two previous articles explain the ‘limited hangout’ exit strategy without putting it in those terms. Both articles evidencing continued and gross revisionist efforts out of CDC et al are required contextual backdrop for this piece whether you decide to consume them before or after:

1. COVID-19 Narrative in Shambles as CDC Revises History in Cover-up Operations, Multiple-front War Scenario Turns Gravely Dark, New Developments: Trump and FBI, Capitol “Insurrection” Entrapment Operation

2. Criminals on the Run and Eating Their Own! COVID-19 Narrative Collapsed, Fauci Set to Resign, HHS Secretary Becerra Under Attack

The limited hangout is defined as a ‘partial hangout‘ meaning that it’s not designed for full disclosure but rather selective and limited disclosure that is subject to strict controls. The limited hangout can be viewed as a deflection point construct that provides some truthful details for close focus as a way to distract from or deflect away from a more fulsome and accurate factual account. I’ve branded this as the “we didn’t know” exit plan and the ‘limited hangout’ tactic originates from the espionage trade. It is further used in media relations, perception management, politics, and information management. [Source]

Former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Victor Marchetti, defined a limited hangout as “spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”^[1][2] While used by the CIA and other intelligence organizations, the tactic has become popularized in the corporate and political spheres.^[3]“ [Source]

Political Moonshine

The levels of weapons grade propaganda and enterprise fraud are as vicious as they are effective in accomplishing two things: hoodwinking the populace and paving the exit path once the damage is done. The complexity of it is found in a layered approach contained within a shifting narrative that occurs incrementally.

Incrementalism is something I’ve routinely addressed defining it along the vector of perception management [psychological warfare] whereby the population is fed a specific sequence of information over time that is designed to move minds one step at a time – incrementally – towards accepting the unacceptable. Never do they leap frog from A directly to Z rather they hit each letter B through Y along the way. It’s the psychological equivalent of slow-boiling frogs.

One example of incrementalism is how “flatten the curve for two weeks” was incrementally transitioned into a full-blown societal lock-down that shuttered businesses and schools and coerced and forced human genetic experimentation in the form of mRNA injections [bioweapons]. Never forget that.

The limited hangout exit strategy is another example of incrementalism. Therein the population was fed a specific sequence of COVID-19 narrative explanations: 1st-an organic viral outbreak occurring by means of the virus jumping from bats to humans and spreading via a wet food market in China, 2nd-the proposition of a “lab leak” theory with continued denials and further adherence to the organic outbreak and 3rd-the confirmation of the “lab leak” position.

The new DOE report accounts for the third component in the sequence.

What is missed altogether; however, is the truth: COVID-19 is a construct of enterprise fraud and the release of SARS-CoV-2 was deliberate and intentional.

Further, we must acknowledge two important facts: 1-SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated and 2-COVID-19 infection and mortality data was and continues to be harvested from three primary data harvesting reservoirs: a] ICD-10 Coding Manual [now ICD-11], b] NVSS diagnostic memos and c] RT-PCR testing.

This means that the SARS-CoV-2 virus never actually required being released and this is especially true given that the evidence is overwhelming that the mRNA injections are now primarily responsible for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality.

The commission of enterprise fraud in the form of data manipulation occurred to sell a fraudulent pandemic to force people into a “vaccine” they didn’t need. The mRNA “vaccine” then became the primary data driver to continue the fraudulent pandemic with the commission of even more enterprise fraud. Nefariously, the egregious enterprise fraud is further extended to more coding and data manipulation to cover-up the injuries and deaths caused by the mRNA injections as they are attributed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

To say that this construct is evil sells it short. I continue to tip my hat to these people. What they have done redefines sinister and it is highly effective such that it would make even Joseph Goebbels blush. The effectiveness is evidenced by the initial uptake rate for the “vaccine” increasing from in excess of 79% to in excess of 82% of the U.S. population. The long-term ramifications and consequences of this stand to be devastating.

When I recently remarked to Dr. Lynn Fynn that in five years, the U.S. population will look much different, she responded, “you’re not wrong.”

To put all of this into proper perspective, it’s incumbent upon us to revisit very old Moonshine.

To preface the following, I highly encourage taking the time to scroll through my extensive and exclusive timeline noting that the graphic illustrations beneath it make for quick uptake on the fraudulent mechanisms of the COVID-19 construct.

In 2012, Anthony Fauci made a statement in a publication he authored indicating that gain of function work; otherwise known as the bioweaponization of dual-use pathogens regulated as BSAT viruses, was “worth the risk.”

In 2014 during Obama’s second term, internal U.S. whistleblowers sounded the alarm on U.S. gain of function work [bioweaponization of viruses]. This would require the Obama Administration to off-shore bioweaponization to foreign countries including Ukraine and China.

In order to export U.S. gain of function work, funding was required and so in 2015, Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance became the conduit for Anthony Fauci to funnel $3.7 million in U.S. funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]. The funding was for the bioweaponization of SARS, which was the preferred bioweapon of choice by 2005.

In 2016, Daszak [EcoHealth Alliance] publicly admitted to the bioweaponization of SARS in conjunction with his “colleagues in China.” That work occurred on our dime via Fauci. The timeline features a video of Daszak’s admission and it’s located near the very bottom [second video beneath the graphic illustrations].

Not only were Daszak and EcoHealth the conduit to funnel U.S. funds to the WIV, but Daszak became the supposed the “independent” corroborator of the Chinese non-lab leak theory [COVID narrative]. It meant he was driving attention away from the lab to which he funneled money. As I stated in July 2021, “All investigations into the lab-leak theory are nothing more than red herrings.”

Respective to the asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war that I’ve covered in a series exceeding 100 articles, I laid-out the premise for the COVID-19 limited hangout exit in a March 2021 podcast, which I later revisited in a May 2021 article:

It wasn’t Chinese sloppiness; however, rather it was Chinese bio-warfare.

That the Wuhan Institute of Virology is a CCP/PLA facility bears down fully and as I’ve asserted dating back for over a year, we’ve been in an undeclared World War III since at least Oct 2019, as previously demonstrated and relative to the existence of the November 13, 2019 FBI Tactical Intelligence report serving as the source of the time frame.

Now consider that in the broader scope of things, a carve-out is being made within the narrative to attribute the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic directly to China, but characterized as internal lab sloppiness. This approach stands a real chance of appeasing low information consumers.

The carve-out permits China to use a fraudulent narrative to characterize as “accidental” and fully compartmentalize the culpability for an asymmetrical strike; a strike that is comprised of an act of war by means of the the release of a bio-WMD. It was an act of war designed to launch a fraudulent pandemic devised to begin the destruction of America from the inside-out.

In so doing, this carve-out will attribute China’s asymmetrical biowarfare strike to a narrative of fraudulent lab sloppiness permitting China to further enshroud its broader construct that included leveraging a deep and broad infiltration of America’s institutions to remove a sitting U.S. president, overthrow the U.S. government and insert a Chinese proxy into the White House in Joe Biden.

This carve-out will also permit China to directly control the narrative, which answers a question some readers are sure to have – Why would China assume responsibility for the release of the bio-WMD (they won’t call it that but the FBI did)?

By assuming responsibility for the “leak” from its CCP/PLA WIV, China removes the U.S. from the dialogue and positions itself to take a full and commanding lead in controlling the narrative as it explains exactly how the “leak” occurred. Within this explanation, China can fabricate whatever story line and evidence it needs to serve it accordingly and it will do so with the WHO (and the CDC, NIH, NIAID) in its back pocket and with the U.S. otherwise left impotent. Those entities are sure to toe the Chinese company line.

Sure, China takes a hit but a self-imposed hit placed exactly where you want it and with full control over everything associated with it is a solid bet – just ask those Americans incriminated in the events of 9/11 and what that event has permitted them to do to the American people. Even more so for China, they feel especially emboldened since its proxy Joe Biden is already installed and positioned to drive it home.

China is betting this allows them to avoid taking WWIII hot (for the time being as Taiwan still looms) but achieving a similar result – global dominance.

Political Moonshine

In another May 2021 article, I identified “a substantial shift in the broader narrative and whereby I have identified the exit plan for Biden and China whereby a carve-out is being made for China to assume responsibility for a “leak” by sowing a fraudulent narrative around internal lab sloppiness. This apparent and odd assumption of culpability by China permits the compartmentalization with China itself and that is beyond a big deal. China is making this compartmentalization as a means of excluding the U.S. from and completely controlling the explaining narrative. It allows China to determine the exact explanation of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and to provide all of the requisite evidence (or not) they want (after they fabricate to meet needs.) It should be a surprise to no one that Biden recently ended former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s investigation into the same rather preferring to defer to the WHO, which China (and Gates and others) own and have owned by means of funding. No sooner did I hit publish than did Joe Biden announce today that he’s opening is on inquiry. Joe can’t even find his house shoes. What are the chances that Proxy Joe and the CCP sing the same song in their summary findings?”

Those chances are 100%. The rhetorical question stated it then and the DOE report evidences it now. Understand that this is China’s call and Biden and the DOE are just making good on orders received.

In May 2021, I wrote a substantial piece on U.S. biosecurity that is imperative for full comprehension of COVID-19: Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules. The article coverage included James LeDuc of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston; just down the road from the now shuttered Chinese consulate famous for the rooftop burning of documents. In 2008, LeDuc was dispatched to the WIV to align the lab with revamped and weakened U.S. biosecurity rules implemented during the Obama era.

Importantly, LeDuc was a longtime funding recipient of Anthony Fauci. LeDuc is an important linkage between the U.S. and the WIV.

If a carve-out were required for the U.S. writ large to facilitate the limited hangout exit strategy, then its point man, Anthony Fauci, also required one.

In early June 2021, I identified Fauci’s carve-out as discussions of his retirement arose. Days later, the Fauci emails would drop indicating the clear vectors for the bioweaponization of SARS-CoV-2. Days after that and in a substantial article, Fauci’s exit was further expanded on relative to a reported criminal investigation into the “lab leak” theory and the implications of Ft. Detrick, a primary U.S. Army bioweaponization facility, and its layered existence including entities like Battelle, which interfaces with the Department of Homeland Security along the lines of the private:public interface.

In that June 2021 article, I revisited a familiar face – James LeDuc of UTMB – because the Fauci’s funding of the WIV became entangled with UTMB and its direct training of Chinese scientists in biosecurity; and that enmeshes LeDuc. The evidence for it arrived in State Department cables from 2018.

In June 2022, I reported on the UN/WHO [China] covering its tracks knowing that the evidence of the Wuhan origins for the SARS-CoV-2 virus was an inescapable fact set. Therefore, their objective became steering the facts to a “lab leak” and not a deliberate release [biowarfare]. With the damage already done, they were positioned to acknowledge what I began evidencing in early 2020 but attributing it to a “leak”: World Health Organization Finally Admits COVID Lab-Leak Theory Is A Possibility.

In August 2022, Jame LeDuc resurfaced again in yet another article where I described him: “Think of LeDuc as an Obama biosecurity liaison to China who was responsible for contributing to the deliberate weakening U.S. biosecurity before then doing the same for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This occurred in ways that permitted the U.S. and China to collaborate on the bioweaponization of SARS-CoV-2 as the viral agent for their enterprise fraud construct.“

That article featuring reporting from the Epoch Times indicating that as the director of the UTMB lab, LeDuc had signed three contracts with Chinese high level biosecurity labs that permitted China to destroy “secret files” from any stage of their collaboration. One of those labs was the WIV where SARS-CoV-2 was bioweaponized.

Notably, in April 2020, LeDuc authored an email to virologist Shi Zhengli, deputy director for WIV’s P4 lab, sharing a document he prepared for the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations to discuss the “lab leak” hypothesis. Curiously, LeDuc would later reverse a previous course and call for more stringent biosecurity across the board.

What’s represented heretofore is but a sliver of the analysis and evidence from the full catalog of nearly 400 COVID-19 articles at Moonshine; however, its enough to properly position and evidence the limited hangout exit that’s fully in play right now.

So, when the NYP reports things like the following, folks with a discerning eye can parse it out appropriately. It parses-out as a partial truth and a partial truth makes it a part of the limited hangout:

The Wall Street Journal reports that the Energy Department has concluded that the COVID pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak.

The conclusion is reportedly based on a classified intelligence report recently provided to the White House and key members of Congress. Many will be exploring why the scientific evidence of a lab leak was so slow to emerge from intelligence agencies.

However, for my part, the most alarming aspect was the censorship, not the science.

There will continue to be a debate over the origins of COVID-19, but now there will be an actual debate.

For years, the media and government allied to treat anyone raising a lab theory as one of three possibilities: conspiracy theorist or racists or racist conspiracy theorists.

[…]

These same figures in politics and media are just moving on to the next approved narrative.

President Biden previously called for more censorship and accused Big Tech of “killing people” by not censoring more views deemed “COVID misinformation.”

The opposite is true. By suppressing alternative scientific and policy views, the public was denied a full debate over mask efficacy, vaccine side effects, COVID origins and other important issues. Many of those questions are only being recognized as legitimate and worthy of debate.

New York Post

We’re seeing the DOE report confirming a “lab leak” because the intelligence community wants us to see it and that narrative at this very particular point in time.

We’re just a couple of months down the road from Anthony Fauci’s retirement and the COVID-19 narrative has imploded into shambles on all fronts. Both Fauci and the COVID-19 construct of enterprise fraud require an exit strategy from center stage. That exit strategy must occur in ways to compartmentalize the culpability for crimes against humanity and the limited hangout exist is the perfect time-tested lane for it. The DOE report on the “lab leak” confirmation is the perfect vehicle to travel down that lane.

In the end, nothing has changed as the complete and factual account of COVID-19 as a construct of enterprise fraud remains the target of obfuscation, deflection and cover-up. That will never change until the American people rise-up as one and make it change.

For now, we’re seeing exactly what China and the intelligence community want us to and the proxy administration of Joe Biden is the facilitator for it.

They now say “lab leak” but for the cohort of discerning and capable independent thinkers, we know differently and we say deliberate biowarfare strike. Not without a sense of irony, that’s also what the evidence says.

-End-