Ex-CDC Director Redfield’s Call for Inquiry into mRNA Injections Exemplifies How Most Reporting on COVID-19 Is Problematic

ANALYSIS: Redfield is engaged in operational cover-up for the Intelligence Community and its limited hangout operations. Political opportunity for Biden with debates in store.

Ex-CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield is one of five respondents [defendants] in our federal grand jury petition lawsuit that was recently dismissed by the notoriously corrupt and ultra-liberal Ninth Circuit. For two and a half years and through due process, our team attempted to compel a federal grand jury to investigate the principals of the CDC, HHS, NVSS, et al for allegations of willful misconduct, malfeasance and criminality in the COVID-19 “pandemic” manifesting as enterprise fraud prosecutable under RICO statue. The allegations of criminality include the roll-out of the dangerous and deadly mRNA injections that were mandated by governors for so many and which have harmed, maimed and killed tens of millions worldwide who trusted their government officials during what was deemed a public health crisis and later declared a “pandemic” by the WHO.

The only “pandemic” that ever occurred was a pandemic of manipulated data, lies and enterprise fraud; and that is a full stop for anyone with a modicum of common sense and intellectual honesty… and a catalog of irrefutable evidence to make that case.

To be intellectually honest, I suppose one could make the argument that the deep, broad and dark shadow cast by the dangerous and deadly side effects of the mRNA injections is in itself a “pandemic.”

Now and two and a half years later, Redfield is stepping out from that shadow to call for an independent inquiry into the mRNA injections in saying, “Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines … we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines, because they were afraid that that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated.”

Note the timing – the damage is already done and people are refusing to further vaccinate or boost in increasing numbers with an election 6 months out.

For Redfield and the rest of us, it’s too little, too late and entirely too pathetic.

“Tired to suggest” and “kind of” and “afraid” are the words of weak, feeble-minded, malleable and corruptible men and those are Redfield’s words.

Now ask yourself this question: What are the chances that in an election year where the incumbent faces the worst polling numbers in history and is entirely un-electable in any legitimate election, Joe Biden jumps onto Redfield’s coattails to open an inquiry into his opponent’s Operation Warp Speed and the mRNA “vaccines” as Trump faces yet another operational lawfare attack?

It’s likely only a matter of short time.

Cue the howler monkeys in Congress to get all lathered up about it.

To demonstrate the absurdity in all of this, consider these facts that no one reports:

For the entirety of that two and a half years, Redfield kept his mouth shut and the government’s own Department of Justice, which is constitutionally bound to be impartial in adjudicating matters brought before its courts, assigned attorneys to represent the five respondents: ROBERT REDFIELD, former Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, in his individual capacity; ROCHELLE WALENSKY, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control; ALEX AZAR, former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his individual capacity; XAVIER BECERRA, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; BRIAN MOYER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Director of the National Center for Health Statistics [as it appears in the filing].

In a federal filing, petitioners [plaintiffs] can only name individuals rather than entities, agencies, departments, etc.

This is why the five respondents are named individually and the language from the filing clearly delineates “in his/her individual capacity” and “in his/her official capacity.”

This also means that on the very front end of that two and a half years, each respondent was served individually receiving direct and specific written notice of the full scope of the allegations against him or her.

Federal lawsuits against individuals “in his/her individual capacity” should net private attorneys for those respondents but stunningly, not in this case.

In this case, DOJ actually assigned defense counsel.

Practically speaking and in consideration of undue influence, we’re dealing with a four-legged stool: the overarching justice system [Judiciary/DOJ], the judge [politically appointed], the defense/respondents [DOJ/federal apparatus] and the plaintiffs/petitioners [two sitting state Senators (Honorable Kim Thatcher and Honorable Dennis Linthicum – OR) and our team’s leader (Dr. Henry Ealy]), all private citizens.

How is impartiality achieved in the Judiciary’s courts when three of the four sides are the federal government?

Can you imagine DOJ assigning attorneys to represent Donald Trump in a federal lawsuit where he was named “in his individual capacity” and “in his official capacity”?

To the contrary, it is a fully corrupt and politically driven DOJ that is responsible for filing lawsuits against Trump on behalf of its Intelligence Community principal and in accordance with its operational lawfare; not defending him.

To double-down on its own absurdity, out of nowhere, DOJ then dispatched its initial appointment to Africa:

PORTLAND, Ore.—Scott Erik Asphaug announced today that, effective July 17, 2022, he will step down as U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon. Asphaug will become the Justice Department’s Resident Legal Advisor in Nairobi, Kenya, where he will be detailed to the Criminal Division’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT) to work with Kenyan counterparts on justice sector issues.

Marco A. Hernández, Chief U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Oregon, also announced today that he will appoint Natalie K. Wight to serve as U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon in an interim capacity pending her confirmation to the position by the U.S. Senate. On June 6, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden Jr. nominated

Wight to serve as Oregon’s next Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney, vice Billy J. Williams who resigned in February 2021.

Asphaug, a 17-year veteran of the Department of Justice, has served as U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon since February 2021. Prior to being appointed U.S. Attorney, he held several leadership positions in the District of Oregon including First Assistant U.S. Attorney and Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney.

US Department of Justice

One out of four ain’t bad, now, and there’s nothing to see here, folks, so move along now.

Absurdity is perhaps the wrong descriptive word and far too gentle to describe what is really occurring and has been for a very long time; and no matter how imperceptible it may be to ordinary Americans.

---

These questions illustrate the point that cuts Redfield’s legs directly out from beneath him:

If he were conflicted by the demands placed on him “in his individual capacity” and “in his official capacity” as CDC Director; and he wished to let his conscience break through into the light of truth about COVID-19 and the mRNA injections, why didn’t Redfield obtain his own counsel instead of deciding to lawyer-up with DOJ?

Why didn’t Redfield and the private defense counsel he should have secured establish whistleblower protections and use our filing against him as an opportunity to testify and showcase the truth while clearing the conscience that now seems to bother him; after all the damage has been done?

How much damage, destruction and death would have been avoided if Redfield had turned whistleblower when the filing was initially made in February 2022 rather than speaking out now, in May 2024?

Why didn’t Redfield come forward at the beginning of COVID-19 rather than now and going on five years after the initial 27 Dec 19 first report of a viral outbreak in China?

“In his official capacity” as CDC Director and being privy to the full scope of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s direct involvement and funding of the SARS-CoV-2 virus via NIAID, through the money conduit of EcoHealth Alliance [Peter Daszak] and at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, why didn’t Redfield interface with the Executive to notify that office of what was a clear construct of enterprise fraud with an election and crimes against humanity hanging in the balance [if I knew in January 2020 and I did because it’s all there and nearing 500 pieces of analysis including the production of a 331-page forensic report with 252 evidentiary exhibits among other reports, then the CDC director sure as hell knew]?

Why didn’t Redfield take a cue from our filing when he received it and approach a convened federal grand jury immediately and on his own to clear his conscience in an effort to “try to suggest” why people should “kind of” be “afraid” about the truth of COVID-19 and the experimental mRNA injections being coerced, mandated and predicated by it?

Why didn’t Redfield approach the Office of the Inspector General which bears the onus of investigating internal impropriety and criminality in the federal apparatus?

---

For two and a half years we attempted to compel Redfield to testify in a federal grand jury investigation into COVID-19 and for two and a half years, Redfield, his DOJ defense counsel and the US government fought it tooth and nail; eventually getting the lawsuit dismissed.

Now and in the run-up to the 2024 election, Redfield suddenly and curiously reverses course on his silence with a decision to go public on COVID-19.

The analysis here routinely refers to “unavoidable circumstances” that necessitate redress and handling, which I routinely assign to the Intelligence Community and whereby aspects of the agencies and departments in the federal apparatus do its bidding.

This is especially so of the DOJ and the tactics of operational lawfare.

Among other things, these things are currently unavoidable on varying timelines: Donald Trump as the presumptive winner of any legitimate 2024 election [doesn’t exist], the truth about COVID-19 as a construct of enterprise fraud and the truth about the harmful and deadly side effects of the experimental mRNA injections.

The enterprise fraud considerations here are the crux of it all because enterprise fraud is the way our government does business.

In other words, they lie, cheat and steal and then lie, cheat and steal some more to cover-up the lying, cheating and stealing; and that’s essentially the layman’s definition of fraud.

Selling apples [flu/pneumo, etc.] as oranges [COVID-19] and profiting [mRNA contracts, financial aid, etc.] along the way…. and maiming, killing and enslaving.

This is why about all of the reporting on the COVID-19 “pandemic” is so problematic and unreliable: it’s approached from a place where COVID-19 is positioned as a legitimate public health crisis to varying degrees and even including assertions of fraud or wrong doing, but always in ways to exacerbate what is otherwise portrayed as authentic.

Hardly any of them approach it from one single and simple basis: COVID-19 is a construct of enterprise fraud prosecutable under RICO statute.

That means there was intent and motive to accompany the architecture and execution of the designed construct and the COVID-19 timeline eviscerates any alternative explanation.

Any COVID-19 reporting outside the fact sets of enterprise fraud and RICO crimes is unreliable no matter how much truth is incorporated into it – that’s what a limited hangout exit strategy is and that is what ODNI and the Intelligence Community are actively engaged in doing.

This makes the work of teammates John Beadoin and Albert Benavides so vital to the truth as they continue to analyze and put forth incontrovertible evidence of the fraud vectors laid-out in the aggregate Moonshine analysis.

Specifically and among other things, Beaudoin and Benavides examine the manipulation of death certificates to obfuscate mRNA-caused harmful side effects, conditions and deaths and to fraudulently propel COVID mortality data by robbing it from comorbidities and other unrelated diagnoses [Beaudoin] and the further obfuscation and manipulation of that data in the reporting-out of it in the VAERS data portal [Benavides].

The obvious point is that fraud was committed to unpack COVID-19 and fraud continues in obfuscating, concealing and covering-up the truth of it; especially the empirical data and analysis on the harmful and deadly mRNA injections.

Here’s another unavoidable circumstance and it explains the timing of Redfield’s emergence as a “kind of” whistleblower to “try to suggest” why people should “kind of” be “afraid” of the mRNA injections: At the same time the Intelligence Community is resetting the ballot for 2024 in working to remove both Biden and Trump [the analysis has covered this since the first indictment of Trump and the Penn Biden Center analysis in January 2023] it is operationally covering-up its COVID-19 construct with a limited hangout exit strategy hinging on a straw-man argument.

As reviewed in the last article, “The “lab leak” theory is a straw man argument serving as a deflection point mechanism. What it’s deflecting from is biowarfare conducted by China, the Intelligence Community, the Department of Defense [it holds all of the mRNA contracts] and other hostiles.”

In June 2023, ODNI put forth its straw man in the form of its lab-leak cover-story: DISMANTLED: Part I – ODNI Report on COVID-19 Wuhan Origins Is an Exit Strategy and TIMELINE ANALYSIS and EVIDENCE: CCP, Dong Jingwei Defection, Whistleblowers, ODNI, COVID-19 Origins Report.

Redfield’s emergence is in service to the IC’s ongoing COVID-19 cover and conceal operations.

Redfield’s emergence also opens a political portal for Biden [the Intelligence Community] to leverage Trump’s Operation Warp Speed in an operational lawfare attack with debates right around the corner.

Politically, they’ll continue bending their own “pandemic” back against Trump as Joe will get to blame Don for what Joe and the rest did to Don and everyone else and tragically, it’s killed millions of Americans and maimed millions more.

I can hear Joe now, “Your own CDC Director just said….”

This play and a last minute swap-out to Michelle Obama may be the only thing substantial enough to save a fully doomed Democratic Party and give them something to point at after they steal 2024.

With a trainload of unavoidable circumstances barreling at him, Redfield has changed his tune and it draws our focus to timing and motive.

Why and why now?

Why: He’s been tasked by the IC to do exactly what he’s doing, which is creating a diversionary “look here” deflection point serving a covert ulterior purpose.

Why now: Unavoidable circumstances always require responsive redress especially when they dominate an election year with the architects of one stolen election putting it all on the line to steal the next one to preserve the power base.

I suppose that I’ve “tried to suggest” that former CDC Director Robert Redfield is “kind of” horrible and duplicitous person with suspicious timing and that his motive should make us somewhat “afraid” in contemplating the truth about the worst ever crimes committed against humanity.

Redfield is engaged in operational cover-up for the Intelligence Community and its limited hangout operations; and he should be received and positioned accordingly.

What will Redfield do when he gets served a second time, because that’s coming?

-End-