New COVID-19 Study Indicates Strong Correlation Between High Number of Vaccine Doses and High Contraction Risk

On its face, the study is another that evidences what the analysis began laying out in January 2020 respective to COVID-19 as a construct of enterprise fraud & the worst ever crimes against humanity.

The team I serve led by Dr. Henry Ealy and sponsored by Oregon State Senators Dennis Linthicum and Kim Thatcher is litigating against the federal apparatus in the Ninth Circuit alleging that COVID-19 is a construct of enterprise fraud; the RICO analysis at Political Moonshine serving that cause.

An aspect of the COVID-19 enterprise fraud is the constructed predicate used to justify experimental mRNA injection production and mandates as left to the individual state governors to determine and enforce.

Other aspects of the analysis include positions on what appears to be well a evidenced depopulation agenda at worst and experimental crimes against humanity at best.

These evidenced notions draw into question the actual purpose of mandated experimental mRNA injections and their redacted contents that by another stack of substantiated evidence by my team [John Beaudoin and Albert Benavides] and many others, is being obfuscated, concealed and covered-up: the data evidencing the known side effects of mRNA injections that maim and kill.

A new study [Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine] further confirms the analysis scrutinizing the claimed safety and effectiveness COVID-19 mRNA injections against the backdrop of the enterprise fraud obfuscating their dangerous and deadly side effects.

Once again, natural immunity prevails as an increased number of mRNA injections and booster doses strongly correlates to increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased [impaired] immunity.

One caveat to reconcile that is not mentioned in the study is the ability of the federal apparatus to control COVID-19 outbreaks by the constructed move from actual mortality data to “new cases” or “infections” as the benchmark measurement for a declared “pandemic.”

Therefore, when the misapplied diagnostic of RT-PCR testing is applied relative to spooled-up cycle thresholds to which it is calibrated, the very specific net-effect of “new cases” is created [this is one way they constructed a fraudulent “pandemic” out of thin air.]

FINDINGS OF THE STUDY

The findings of the study include:

“Risk of COVID-19 based on prior infection and vaccination history: […] The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2).”

“Bivalent vaccine effectiveness: […] The multivariable analyses also found that, the more recent the last prior COVID-19 episode was
the lower the risk of COVID-19, and that the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19.”

“Discussion: […] A possible explanation for a weaker than expected vaccine effectiveness is that a substantial proportion of the population may have had prior asymptomatic Omicron variant infection. About a third of SARS-CoV-2 infections have been estimated to be asymptomatic in studies that have been done in different places at different times [17–19].

[…] The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the study start date, and which they had every opportunity to do.

[…] these individuals… more likely to have exhibited higher risk-taking behavior… [and] Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses.”

[…] This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.

[…] The effect of multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses on future risk of COVID-19 needs further study.”

The study and its findings are clear: more injections and boosters equates to decreased immunity and greater sickness.

These side effects were known beforehand according to many who were out in front of the vaccine mandates warning of their potential harm and dangers.

There is no other viable and plausible explanation for COVID-19 than crimes against humanity facilitated by enterprise fraud.

This study strongly lends to that position.

ORIGINS & ANALYSIS

Regular Moonshine contributor “Wall St.” sent me the following Xwitter post by Jim Ferguson, which is the impetus for this article.

The objective was obviously to access the study but Ferguson’s post only recapitulates the article he’s sourcing from The People’s Voice.

The People’s Voice article is a reprint from this source article at Slay.

What Ferguson lays-out in his post in terms of the calculations and projections on life expectancy ARE NOT CONTAINED in the actual study and are a PROPRIETARY PRODUCT OF AN INSURANCE ANALYSIS CITED BY SLAY.

Therefore readers should consume that information accordingly, independently and to vet it on their own.

Slay’s article by Frank Bergman is entitled ’24 Years Wiped from Life Expectancy of ‘Fully Boosted’ Men, Study Shows.’

Bergman says, “This means that the mRNA vaccines and booster shots are a “slow-acting genetic poison,” according to the study,” but THE STUDY DOES NOT CONTAIN THE PHRASE “slow-acting poison” anywhere in it.

Clicking on Bergman’s “study” link takes you not to the study but to another article at The Expose: Jaw-Dropping Discovery: CDC Data Reveals COVID Vaccine Could Shave Off 24 Years from Men’s Lives!.

That article says,

“The latest US data analysed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Livess and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst, shows a really really disturbing trend.

The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time. It continues indefinitely.

In fact, CDC All-Cause Mortality data show that each vaccine dose increased mortality by 7% in the year 2022 compared to the mortality in year 2021.

So if you have had 5 doses then you were 35% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you have had one dose then you were 7% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you are unvaxxed then you were no more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021,” and goes on to say, “CDC All-Cause Mortality Data shows that every year, every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of 7% PER JAB PER YEAR. That is a slow-acting genetic poison.“

The Expose

The Expose offers its conclusion:

Conclusion

The population of NSW in Australia is 6½ million people. They are a highly vaccinated group. Looking at the Australian Government data for the last 6 weeks of 2022 we see that.

1. Those with 1 or 2 doses are 20x more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than those with no doses.
2. Those with 3 or 4 or more doses are 35x more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than those with no doses.
3. Being unvaxxed provides 100% protection from having to go to the ICU. Being vaxxed gives you a 6 in 100,000 chance of being hospitalised in the ICU.
4. Vaccines are unsafe and extremely ineffective.
5. COVID-19 vaccination is putting unsustainable pressure on hospitals and ICUs in NSW and by implication all over the world. 
6. The NHS in the UK will be destroyed unless vaccinations are banned immediately. It may already be too late.
7. The vaccines prevent herd immunity. Herd immunity will never be reached in the vaxxed. It has already been reached in the unvaxxed
8. The continuation of the pandemic is entirely caused by the anti vaccines.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The cited study did not produce the findings as they are introduced and cited.

Rather deeper analysis on the data produced by the study and performed by a life insurance analyst produced those findings.

Readers are left to independently consume and vet the analysis outside of the study.

Regardless of the projections on life expectancy, on its face the study is another that evidences what the analysis began laying out in January 2020 respective to COVID-19 as a construct of enterprise fraud being used to commit the worst ever crimes against humanity.

SOURCE

SOURCE / Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine / Nabin K. Shrestha,1 Patrick C. Burke,2 Amy S. Nowacki,3 James F. Simon,4 Amanda Hagen,5 Steven M. Gordon 1 / 1 Departments of Infectious Diseases, 2 Infection Prevention, 3 Quantitative Health Sciences, 4 Enterprise Business Intelligence, and 5 Occupational Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf

-End-