Palpable Panic: Intelligence Community Tailors Narrative to Remove Trump for 2024

American voters didn’t run FROM TRUMP, instead they ran TO TRUMP

The panic is palpable and the general, persistent never-Trump narrative has recently been tailored by the Intelligence Community to augment and refine the context behind it. Two new developments indicate how the narrative is being tailored.

Until now, the incessant gaslighting of the American people has centered on an entrapment operation at the U.S. Capitol to generate an “insurrection” narrative that goes down two primary lanes.

The first lane is the removal of President Trump for being a felon who engaged in the act of “insurrection” and who is plausibly subject to removal from the ballot by means of the 14th Amendment; for other matters of constructed Trump criminality featured in a wide slate of multi-state indictments; and for defending a patently stolen 2020 election.

The second lane is the broader attack on a Marxist regime’s political enemies bridging from the Capitol “insurrection” to over 100 million Trump, conservative, Christian and MAGA “voters” by targeting and prosecuting them with FBI/DOJ using a carefully constructed extra-constitutional schematic that relies upon terms like “domestic terrorism” and “domestic terrorist” to legally trigger extra-constitutional power and authority to prosecute.

On its face, all of this bears the hallmarks of partisan politics; albeit in historically unprecedented ways.

In reality, though, it’s all a carefully produced show written and directed by the Intelligence Community.

The problem is that the show has encountered a contextual glitch and the audience isn’t buying it anymore, so planned revisions are being plugged-into the show to revise, augment and tailor the script as necessary.

In March 2023 and building on a stack of existing analysis, I reiterated the following position in an article entitled ‘The Bidens, China, Russia, Ukraine, SVB, and Silvergate: Making Felons, Erasing Felonies and Blowing It All Up, Literally’: “They must make a felon out of Trump to keep him out of office in an election he is guaranteed to win and whereby he stands as a direct threat to unravel every last bit of the truth. Even so, they can still steal it outright like they did in 2020.”

Comporting with federalism as an attack and enforcement vector, this is exactly how the IC has used operational lawfare to issue one indictment of Trump after another; in one state after another.

It also includes lawfare at the hands of a compromised Special Counsel in Jack Smith, who was appointed by an equally compromised Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Riding the back of its Capitol “insurrection” mule, the IC has used the MSM to relentlessly gaslight the people into believing the “insurrection” narrative in order to force a manufactured turn-about on Trump.

The IC’s clear objectives were to erode at Trump’s base and drive his voters to a suitable replacement, like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, at the same time it was removing Trump altogether.

The IC’s greatest concern had come to fruition; however, and it necessitated that the IC formulate a remedy: American voters didn’t run FROM TRUMP and instead, more of them ran TO TRUMP.

The more the IC does to remove Trump, the more Trump is less likely to be removed right up until assassination or something as equally effective.

Two new developments inform this broader analysis in ways that identify the context for the IC’s remedy and its next play as the list of pre-assassination options quickly dries-up.

From the two developments we get two confirmations:

---

1-From the “insurrection” narrative base, Trump is being branded a “security threat” by “experts” dispatched to the MSM by the IC to sow narrative.

We’re currently in the seed-planting stage with expectations of sprouting and growth.

This means that term will become a legal impediment that is thrust between Trump and the Executive; and which is built around the false narrative that Trump poses a severe risk to national defense and security that extends to the same globally.

The context was dropped in a TV interview at Sky News’ Sunday Morning featuring Trevor Philips and the former MI6 Head Sir Richard Dearlove [read the story here].

2-At home, reporting from NBC News [featured at Gateway Pundit] builds from the “security threat” platform to indicate the growing concerns I’ve outlined from the Intelligence Community to the extent that pretext is being established to soften the public for operations to remove Trump that are sure to come: “Concerns are intensifying among far-left national security “experts” and Pentagon insiders over the possibility that former President Donald Trump might leverage the U.S. military to enforce his political will if he returns to the Oval Office. In a detailed report, NBC News inadvertently admitted the existence of a “Deep State,” allegedly working to facilitate a military coup against former President Trump if he is freely and fairly elected by Americans.”

“Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist wrote, “NBC reports the left is plotting ways to have military not be under civilian control. This dangerous and unconstitutional usurpation of power is being framed by NBC as good because it will undermine Trump if he is freely and fairly elected by Americans.””

---

It’s clear that the IC is maneuvering to intercede on a set of “unavoidable circumstances” where it doesn’t matter what it does short of assassinating Trump, this is who the American people overwhelmingly want as President.

This necessitates that the IC accept this fact and align accordingly.

Our entire point here is that alignment.

Leaving the assassination arrow in the quiver, the IC is preemptively constructing a deep chasm between an Executive and a Commander in Chief whom they could not effectively preclude from office in 2024.

The operational objective is to intercede on the Executive at the interface between the office’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief and the U.S. military subject to that command.

This creates a necessary “national security” threat to justify forthcoming action, which would equate to another ‘Dynastic Bush’ false flag operation.

That narrative is now being sown and it all grew out of the IC’s Capitol “insurrection” entrapment operation.

Extending the constructed “security threat” to global security is how an international consensus will be created to further drive the internal national dialogue to remove Trump for that reason.

Unless the IC wants an instant Civil War at this moment, it’s becoming evident that it prefers to accept the “unavoidable circumstance” of a second Trump Administration and adjust course accordingly; leaving the assassination arrow in the quiver for now.

Does “security threat” sound like the recipe for Trump’s third fraudulent impeachment beginning in February 2025?

Only if he and all of us live long enough to get to 2025.

The gaslighting on the fraudulent Capitol “insurrection” backfired and had the wrong effect.

Voters are now sprinting TO TRUMP and not FROM TRUMP!

The panic it has caused is palpable but manageable for the IC.

Therefore, the IC narrative must be tailored to gaslight Americans into believing that former President Trump is a “security threat.”

Like I began saying in early 2020 relative to COVID-19: These people will never stop until they are made to stop.

Ready to make them stop yet?

---

To go deeper in further understanding how the Intelligence Community jumps from one party platform to the other in order to accomplish its operational objectives, continue reading.

---

-End-

---

To better understand how the Intelligence Community jumps from one political party to the other in order to accomplish operational objectives, consider the case of 9/11.

Bill Clinton the Democrat, known Epstein associate, frequent [26 or so times] Lolita Express traveler and Little St. James Island dweller, transitioned out of office in January 2001.

He replaced the architect for it all, Republican George H.W. Bush.

Some nine months later and borne out of ‘Dynastic Bush,’ the architect’s son George W. Bush and his administration unpacked the false-flag construct 9/11 on the world.

Things were never the same and that was all by design.

The point is that George H.W. Bush is our analytical head of the snake; the architect of ‘Dynastic Bush’ and the singleton whom is responsible for the primary Intelligence Community/CIA:Executive Branch interface that is the architecture for what people perceive to be the United States as a nation and the federal government supposedly running it.

That notion is far from the truth.

It’s the Intelligence Community that’s been in the driver’s seat since no later than 1963 after a problematic Executive was factored out in JFK.

The broader point is that until January 2009, the IC had been operating from the Republican platform under GWB to do its criminal and extra-constitutional bidding.

Like all things, though, these constructs lose their luster in the public’s eye as momentum wanes and so they require frequent re-tooling and less frequent replacement.

Re-tooling is what is occurring now in response to Trump’s growing popularity caused by failed IC operations.

Replacement is about as easy - the IC simply jumps to the opposite platform to seamlessly resume established operations as the American people are dished an entirely new and enormous piece of fat to chew on for the next four years.

This is where the two-party fallacy applies providing the needed kabuki theater featuring opposing sides bickering, fighting and building public momentum - all constructed and propagandized, of course - to provide platform options from which the IC can operate.

Therein, partisan dynamics apply to topical objectives [the border is a good example and so are abortion and education issues] and so the best party is leveraged for each objective no matter the partisan operational platform [Democrats drive their causes during Republican administrations and vice versa].

This explains why “Democrats” always get what they want and “Republicans” never fight back against it.

What it really explains is how in every instance and no matter the political optics of winners and losers, the only real winner is ALWAYS the Intelligence Community.

Everyone else loses.

The context of what is seen and heard is literal make believe courtesy of the Intelligence Community and its brand of kabuki theater.

When one platform’s luster is gone and its momentum has waned, or in the case that a full-narrative change is needed to usher-in something brand new, the IC hops to the other platform and retools the narrative to continue dragging an unwitting people along to the same awful destination.

That’s what happened in 2001 in the transition from WJC/Democrat to GWB/Republican; and before that from GHWB/Repbulican to WJC/Democrat; and then again in 2009 from GWB/Republican to BHO/Democrat.

From 2001 to 2009, the IC leveraged the Republican Party until it lost its luster and momentum.

Ever since Obama’s inauguration in 2009, the IC has been leveraging the Democratic Party to do its bidding as it is today.

The “unavoidable circumstances” of Trump’s unexpected 2016 win necessitated that the IC remain on the Democratic platform.

This 2009-present timeline undeniably bears the hallmarks of a full conversion to Marxist communism to enforce tyranny in the form of global rule.

Trump’s 2016 electoral victory featured voter participation rates that broke the fractional voting algorithms in place to deliver that election to HRC and so her unexpected loss caused a severe set of “unavoidable circumstances” that had to be dealt with; hence the political insanity of January 2017-January 2021 and through to the present.

This is the public image, meanwhile the Republican Party drives the same agenda privately behind closed doors.

It’s a single party, folks, and the two-party system is actually worse than just a fallacy.

Rather and like how federalism has been bent back against us as an enforcement mechanism for unconstitutional laws and mandates, the two-party system has been the mechanism the IC uses to sow misinformation, disinformation and malinformation via constructed political discourse.

Doing so allows the IC to rule with impunity where the two political sides never give fidelity to objectivity or the rule of law.

It is the architecture for the IC to manufacture events and herd the masses to desired geopolitical ends; none of which are any good for any of us.

Out with Clinton, in with GWB and on with 9/11 so we can hurry up and get to COVID-19, because that’s where all of the real fun begins forever after.

The one impediment to all of this is Donald J. Trump and with a firm understanding of how the IC operates, that fact explains all the rest.

---