Putin Details “Comprehensive” Counterstrike, Barrage of Drones and Missiles Targeted Ukrainian Energy Infrastructure
ANALYSIS: Putin carried-out overnight counterstrikes for ATACMS attack deep inside Russia. 100 drones and 90 missiles target energy infrastructure. Widespread blackout affected 1 million.
Overnight between Thanksgiving and Black Friday, Russia carried-out its counterstrike that had been looming since Ukraine attacked deep inside Russia with long-range ATACMS missiles provided by the Administration of Joe Biden. We’re thankful for two things. The first is the adults in the form of Donald Trump’s second administration returning to the Oval Office on 20 Jan 25 if he can stay alive and make it through the Senate’s certification of the election. The second is the measured restraint that Vladimir Putin continues to exercise as the Intelligence Community/Pentagon/NATO/State Department conglomerate continues attempting to bait Putin into crossing the chemical/nuclear red line that Biden drew in September 2022. Yesterday’s analysis featured remarks at the CSTO Summit in Astana where Putin indicated Russia would target “military facilities, defense industry enterprises or decision-making centers in Kiev.” The overnight Russian counterstrike in Ukraine resulted in the nation’s energy infrastructure being targeted with 100 drones and 90 missiles that resulted in widespread power outages affecting one million Ukrainians.
This is the 233rd article in the series War, Famine & Disease.
Friday it was reported that Putin address the CSTO Summit to announce that 100 drones and 90 missiles had been launched over the previous 48 hours as a counterstrike to the ATACMS deep inside Russia.
“We carried out a comprehensive strike,” Putin announced Thursday going on to say, “It was a response to ongoing attacks on our territory using [U.S.-supplied] ATACMS missiles.”
For the moment, Russia’s highly advanced and lethal Oreshnik hypersonic missile platform, which Putin routinely reiterates is “indefensible,” occupies center stage.
Previously, Putin had warned and placed on notice high priority Ukrainian targets qualified as “military facilities, defense industry enterprises or decision-making centers in Kiev”: Putin Identifies Likely Targets of Looming Counterstrike, Calls Ukrainian Government Illegitimate Under Zelensky.
While Americans indulged on the fares of Thanksgiving dinner, Putin cited Russia’s active surveillance and tracking of long-range platforms inside Ukraine going on to issue another direct warning to to the “decision-making centers in Kiev.”
Relative to this surveillance and tracking is Poland and any NATO bases that might qualify to the extent that if Putin targets long-range platforms in Poland, it would likely transition us from a full scale regional war to a global one.
In his warning to Kiev’s decision-makers, Putin specified the Oreshnik platform, which he further noted is already in serial production.
Putin addressed the lethality of the Oreshnik platform in saying it renders its targets “into dust” where strikes featuring multiple Oreshnik launches are “comparable to a nuclear strike.”
Putin cited Oresnik’s performance capabilities noting its ability to reach speeds of “around three kilometers per second” where its payload delivers temperatures and energy “like the surface of the Sun” upon impact.
Putin did this as he painted Zelensky with the same brush that painted Joe Biden – the brush of illegitimacy.
This is because the presidential term of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who the US installed subsequent to its regime change operations beginning in 2014 [Maidan Revolution] with the help of Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi, ended in May 2024 with no elections for a successor held.
Martial law brought about by the constructed war that incoming US President Joe Biden began with a foreign policy shift announced in late December 2020; and where Zelensky was installed to operate Ukraine as a proxy state in the West’s proxy war against Russia, were interceded on by that war: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War.
See how that works?
They call it “democracy” and you’d have to be as dumb as Kamala Harris to believe that; and you can say the same about all of the weaponized propaganda in the United States citing the “Constitution” and “democracy.”
As the analysis put it yesterday: “In its most basic form, TWO ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT’S INSTALLED, PROPPED-UP AND ARMED by the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate HAVE THE WORLD IN A RACE TO THE FINISH LINE where either Donald J. Trump survives to be inaugurated as a harbinger of peace and we all win or Joe Biden and Volodymyr Zelensky go global and thermonuclear and we all lose.”
The analysis identified and explained Biden’s chemical/nuclear entrapment operations in September 2022 noting that the construct has been routinely reinforced on Biden’s march to World War III.
Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to examine Putin’s remarks about Oresnik’s lethality and performance capabilities through the lens of Biden’s nuclear entrapment operation to ask ourselves an important 3-part question:
Will Putin order strikes on the decision-making centers in Kiev?
Will those strikes feature the Oreshnik platform?
Will the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate qualify Oreshnik strikes in Kiev as sufficient to cross the red line Biden drew to frame the nuclear entrapment construct because Putin specifically made the Oreshnik platform an analog to a nuclear strike due to its lethality and performance capabilities?
If the answer to each of those questions is “yes,” then the follow-up question is both obvious and 2-part:
Will the application of the principle of war reciprocity continue uninterrupted causing NATO/Ukraine to issue long-range and perhaps ICBM strikes deep inside of Russia to strike in-kind and similar targets?
Would long range strikes of this nature deep inside of Russia be sufficient to finally drive the 5-stage linear war trajectory from the transition line we straddle between full scale regional war and global war fully to the latter?
If the answer to those two questions is “yes,” then the follow-up question becomes this:
How long will it take before Beijing moves on Taiwan and the US finds itself in a detrimental state of depleted munitions expended in its proxy war with Russia and facing a three-front war in the long projected three theaters for World War III: 1-Russia/Ukraine, 2-China/Taiwan/South China Sea and 3-Middle East/Iran/Syria/Israel?
To answer that question, factor-in how well the Germans did managing one less front when Allied forces opened a second front in World War II on 06 Jun 1944.
For now, the prospect of peace hinges on Donald Trump returning to the Oval Office in January, where he and Putin maintained normalized diplomatic relations for four years, and Putin’s continued measured restraint.
All eyes must be on on Biden’s nuclear [or chemical] entrapment operation where that lens should overlay the existing and developing fact sets to be the strongest indicator of what is to come.
The long-time projected time frame for a kinetic flashpoint to WWIII is the range of 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months as impacted by the 06 Jan 25 Senate vote to certify the election, where the Vice President Kamala Harris will preside as the President of the U.S. Senate, and Trump’s 20 Jan 25 inauguration.
In a perfect world, the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate would successfully bait Putin to cross Biden’s red line so it can do what it’s always coveted: fire its ICBMs directly at Russia while avoiding the messiness of a proxy war state altogether.
If IC/DoD/NATO/State can’t achieve this ultimate operational objective, be ready for Oreshnik strikes to be equated to nuclear strikes and through weaponized propaganda, qualified as sufficient to cross Biden’s red line.
If that happens and to the side of the latter, we’ll essentially have both feet over the transition line between full scale regional war and global conflict.
Until then, we remain straddling the line.
Stay tuned for analysis being published on a 24-hour cycle in the late morning or after.
Here is the contextual backdrop to this analysis featuring a chronology of events for this 2-week escalation period and all of the analysis covering it:
CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP
Chronology
The war escalation chronology that began in late December 2020 [From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War] intensified beginning 17 Nov 24 and it entails:
17 Nov 24: Joe Biden’s Sunday authorization for long-range missiles against Russia: Trump Details Plan to “Dismantle the Deep State,” Deep State Counters by Crossing Putin’s Line on Long Range Missiles.
19 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Tuesday leveraging of Biden’s authorization to strike Russia with US long-range missiles: US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat.
20 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Wednesday firing of 12 UK [NATO] Storm Shadow missiles at Russia targeting the Kursk region in Southern Russia: 12 UK Storm Shadow Missiles Were Fired Into Russia, Local Sources Say.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s retaliatory ICBM strike against Ukrainian [NATO?] military targets: Russia Fires ICBM Into Ukraine For First Time, Kiev Claims.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday attack on Ukraine using hypersonic missiles with MIRV technology: REPORT ACCELERATES ALREADY EXPEDITED WWIII TRAJECTORY: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday advisement that a US/NATO missile base in Poland [NATO ally] that became operational this month [reported last Saturday] has been classified as a potential priority strike target: Putin Validates War Analysis: The world stands on the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war.
22 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Friday cancellation of regular parliament session to set emergency talks with NATO [from Breitbart]: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
24 Nov 24: Ukraine’s overnight Sunday strikes deep inside of Russia with ATACMS long-range missile systems provided by the United States: REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia.
26 Nov 24: Ukraine and NATO hold emergency talks with an outcome defaulting to perpetual war and trending towards a chemical/nuclear entrapment scenario: All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike and NATO and Ukraine Emergency Talks Result in Default to Previous Stance, Escalations Ease for Now, Russian Counterstrike Still Looms.
27 Nov 24: Putin addressed the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Summit in Astana to lay-out plausible Kiev-based targets for Russia’s looming counterstrike: Decision-making centers in Kiev could be targeted in Oreshnik strikes — Putin.
28 Nov 24: Russia carries-out counterstrike in Ukraine in response to ATACMS strikes deep inside Russia deploying 100 drones and firing 90 missiles targeting Ukrainian power infrastructure and causing widespread blackouts affecting 1 million people: Putin Threatens Ukrainian Capital With New Hypersonic Missile.
Established Cycle
As indicated in the analysis and with war reciprocity bearing down, the established cycle is roughly 24 hours.
With a 24-hour turnover in the cycle and during this period of marked intensification, the analysis here is being published daily in the late morning or after.
Analysis
Here is the analysis for the 2-week escalation period:
Manufactured Insanity of World War III Escalates, ICBMs for 1st Time Ever, Where Does This End?
WORLD WAR III: US Officials Discuss Nuclear Armament for Ukraine as Russian Deterrence Strategy
REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia
All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike
To view the aggregate analysis chronologically, see the War, Famine & Disease series.
5-Stage Linear War Trajectory
The analysis laid-out 5 plausible outcomes and where time is taken time to identify ones already eclipsed: 1-threat of war, 2-limited scale regional war, 3-full scale regional war, 4-limited scale global war and 5-full scale global war.
The outcomes posed represent a LINEAR TRAJECTORY from the THREAT OF WAR to FULL SCALE GLOBAL WAR.
The analysis indicates our current placement on the linear trajectory of 5 outcomes: CURRENT PLACEMENT: Resting on the transition line between a full scale regional war and a limited or full scale global war.
-End-
Seems like Putin might be the only one in the mix who actually cares about his people. Obviously Zelenskyy and the Biden admin don’t.
What highly detailed and excellent analysis! This is likely the exact pathway that will be pursued unless Trump returns to reengage with Putin. (No doubt in my mind that the back channels are being heavily utilized throughout.). I’d also expect these moves were all anticipated and countermoves prepared.
A couple of things jumped out to me that may very likely tie to 911.
1) ‘…Oreshnik platform, which he further noted is already in serial production…’. For how long has this weapon been in production? Where did the underlying technology come from?
2) ‘…the lethality of the Oreshnik platform in saying it renders its targets “into dust”…’.
Based upon the sheer amount of ‘missing’ material mass that should have been many stories high after the fall of the twin towers, but wasn’t; it seems reasonable this is the type of technology used. The fact that nearly 1 million tons of mass fell onto the ‘bathtub’ that protects Manhattan from catastrophic flooding and did only minimal damage? The sheer amount of ‘dust’ after the towers’s fall that remained for weeks in the NYC area?
Thank you for the excellent analysis of how this will progress unless it is thwarted by the Trump administration and likely patriots in the military. Hence the appointment of General Kellogg?
God bless you.🙏🙏