The Department of Defense and Its Biowarfare Against the American People: Contracts and Evidence

A massive article encompassing excellent research by Sasha Latypova to augment the existing body of Moonshine work on COVID-19. It evidences the 30-part Dept. of Defense biowarfare framework.

Jan 14, 2023

The U.S. Department of Defense has been engaged in biowarfare against the American people and the world over for the entire duration of the COVID-19 “pandemic” that is an enterprise fraud construct. We see direct evidence of this in the existence of DoD biolabs in Ukraine that are being targeted by Russia, which tie directly to the Biden Crime Family via Metabiota, to Dr. Anthony Fauci and his NIAID funding of the bioweaponization of SARS-CoV-2 at The Wuhan Institute of Virology via Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance serving as the conduit for the funding. Those are but two boulders atop a mountain of reliable COVID-19 evidence.

[*This 2-day effort still requires a final proofread.]

Introduction & Backdrop

Let’s begin with this statement: The gravity of the of the claims in this work that the U.S. Department of Defense is and has been conducting biowarfare against the American people is enormous. It is therefore incumbent upon us to substantiate and evidence those claims thoroughly, which makes this piece a substantial and long one.

Please understand that the Moonshine work into COVID-19 is as substantial as anything to be found and it eclipses well over 350 articles of granular analysis and evidence underpinned by work drawing back to early January 2020. There is neither the time nor the space to recapitulate it all in this piece and so some of it will be revisited mostly in the form of links to articles for independent consumption.

For anyone looking for quick uptake on COVID-19, the Moonshine timeline [exclusive work with over 100 entries; each with primary and secondary sources, and explanatory graphic illustrations] is the best bet: COVID-19 Enterprise Fraud Construct Timeline: Major Dates, Events, Entities & Legislation.

That said, for our claims we must build a framework for the examination of the Department of Defense, its biowarfare against Americans and the relative contracts and evidence therein. An important fact set informs our understanding: A rogue intelligence community – the fourth branch of government – is the driving force under the surface of everything and it is impossible to separate it from the Department of Defense respective to COVID-19; ergo, we examine them together as one ubiquitous and dynamic force of destruction.

Since the Department of Defense is our central node, it fully envelops war and that fully envelops the multiple-front war scenario with Russia/Ukraine and China/Taiwan/South China Sea. It also envelops massive corruption and money laundering in Ukraine, which overlays the FTX/Sam Bankman-Fried scandal. Quite literally, it’s all enmeshed and interconnected. That means the volume of work existing in the backdrop of COVID-19 and the Department of Defense that is necessary to understand in order to develop a reasonable level of comprehension for our framework in this article is massive.

The FTX/Ukraine scandal is 17 articles. The work in to COVID-19 exceeds 350 articles. The work into the multiple-front war stands at 98 articles.

I took the time to handpick some backdrop articles and some items more critical to this specific piece. They are presented in separate sections and the titles alone are informative.

SKIP AHEAD or dig in

[Note that the older items were published on an earlier version of the website and include items from a now deleted Moonshine Twitter account that was permanently banned as well as linked items now scrubbed from the internet, making some articles glitchy in places]:

These backdrop items are foundational pieces important to our DoD biowarfare framework in this article:

STOP HERE

If you SKIPPED AHEAD, STOP HERE and pick back up knowing that the 15th article in the list above is the last article written in this COVID-19 series. It is required contextual backdrop that introduces how the Department of Defense engaged in biowarfare against the American people.

That article analyzed two sources:

The Brownstone Institute: Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety?
The Armed Forces Press: BREAKING: DOD CONTROLLED COVID ‘VACCINES’ FROM THE START UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM – LIED THE ENTIRE TIME – Were NEVER ‘Safe and Effective’

From that article, we set the table for how Department of Defense contracts and other evidence validate our claims; the first of which comes from the Brownstone Institute source linked above [emphasis added]:

The US Department of Defense (US DoD) has had a dominant role in the response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in the development, and distribution of the Covid 19 vaccines, a fact hidden from the general public. In those processes many standard steps and procedures, otherwise required for pharmaceutical products, were omitted or circumvented.
Definition of these vaccines as “countermeasures” rather than therapeutic agents has permitted their expedited progression to emergency use authorisation and widespread rollouts.The Brownstone Institute
Political Moonshine

Defining the mRNA injections as “countermeasures” and not “vaccines,” which they are not by any legal, standard, patent or medical definition; at least until they changed the definition to accommodate them, is critical. Hold on to that notion.

The U.S. Department of Defense bears down on COVID-19 given that the Trump Administration classified the “pandemic” as a national security initiative, which fall under the purview of the Department of Defense giving it jurisdiction. Consider this [emphasis added]:

Contrary to popular belief that pharmaceutical companies drove the COVID vaccine development programs, the US FDA’s website (FDA, 2020) reveals that the United States Department of Defence (DoD) has been in full control of the Covid Vaccine development program since its beginning. The DoD has been responsible for development, manufacturing, clinical trials, quality assurance, distribution and administration, since that time (FDA, 2020; Rees and Latypova, 2022; KEI, 2022; Medical Defense Consortium, 2022; Rees, 2022). The major pharmaceutical companies have been involved as “Project Coordination Teams” effectively performing as subcontractors to the DoD. The Chief Operating Officer for the Warp Speed vaccine program is the US Department of Defence, and the Chief Science Advisor is the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The Brownstone Institute

Sasha Latypova

Sasha Latypova is a pharmaceutical and medical device Research & Development executive who has done an exceptional job of examining the Department of Defense contracts that contribute significantly to our DoD biowarfare framework.

Moving forward, the analysis relies heavily on research from Latypova, who is referenced in the linked Brownstone piece, and these two publications in particular:

To begin establishing our framework, we build upon the pandemic as a national security initiative, the Department of Defense’s broad jurisdiction and control, and the technical definition of “countermeasures.” Contracts and other evidence augment the framework to evidence our position[s].

The objective in the following is to augment the existing body of Moonshine work with Latypova’s research and evidence to delineate the framework for the DoD’s biowarfare against Americans.

The Department of Defense Biowarfare Framework

The framework is comprised of 30 items, entities, agencies and departments as presented below. Note that although it is comprehensive, this criminal conspiracy is massive and nebulous to almost frustrating levels meaning that it’s incomplete. Some of the finer details are omitted to keep this piece manageable while still fully making our case and evidencing it.

Each component to the framework receives a brief description for its DoD biowarfare application to COVID-19 as a construct of enterprise fraud that was classified as a national security matter; and where warranted, a more detailed explanation is provided. Contracts and other evidence augment the framework.

1. The Stafford Act

The COVID-19 “pandemic” as a construct of enterprise fraud leveraged as a vector for biowarfare, rests upon a single fulcrum that is the Stafford Act. As a component that was in-part exploited to remove a sitting president, the Stafford Act was one of the first subjects to be examined in the broader Moonshine body of work on COVID.

Therein, the technical definition of “presidential competence” is key. When a public emergency exceeds the scope of a president’s competence, the Stafford Act compels the president to defer to his field experts and in the case of COVID-19, that was essentially the Fauci/Birx/Pence White House Coronavirus Task Force.

“Presidential competence” is not contained in the Stafford Act specifically but it applies to it relative to national emergencies, for which COVID-19 qualifies by unilateral determination. The Stafford Act frames the emergency determination and response processes at the federal level; in conjunction with its agencies and departments, down to the interface with states and local levels. This permitted federalism to become the enforcing arm of the COVID-19 construct relative to the COVID-19 response in each state in the form of mandates, etc.

On the other side of “presidential competence” and respective to Trump was the 25th Amendment. Pretext for use of the 25th already existed in abundance and whereby it would have been leveraged to remove Trump had he not complied with the Task Force’s decisions and recommended actions throughout the pandemic and for example, policies on masking, lock downs and mRNA vaccinations. Federalism as the enforcement mechanism bears down as the federal apparatus only issued those recommendations, which were then codified and issued by edict and enforced by governors in each state.

This effectively amounted to the functional usurpation of Trump’s Article II Executive authority. This is also why Trump effectively compartmentalized all of the culpability for COVID-19 with the Task Force when he twice forced Dr. Anthony Fauci to publicly correct the record on Task Force recommendations and his immediate acceptance of them in a mid-April 2020 press conference. In other words, Trump forced Fauci to state that everything Trump said and did was their responsibility, not Trump’s.

*Image source

According to Section 319 of the Public Health Services Act, the HHS secretary can unilaterally determine a Public Health Emergency. Once the PHE is declared, the president’s competence is immediately drawn into conflict to begin the functional usurpation of Executive power.

Following the WHO’s lead from the previous day, this occurred on 31 Jan 20. Then, on 13 Mar 20 and again following the WHO’s lead from two days earlier, a Pandemic Declaration was made citing the Stafford Act.

From Trump’s 13 Mar 20 letter on the emergency declaration [emphasis added]:

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) declared a public health emergency on January 31, 2020, under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), in response to COVID-19. I have taken sweeping action to control the spread of the virus in the United States, including by suspending entry of foreign nationals seeking entry who had been physically present within the prior 14 days in certain jurisdictions where COVID-19 outbreaks have occurred, including the People’s Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Schengen Area of Europe. The Federal Government, along with State and local governments, has taken preventive and proactive measures to slow the spread of the virus and treat those affected, including by instituting Federal quarantines for individuals evacuated from foreign nations, issuing a declaration pursuant to section 319F‑3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d‑6d), and releasing policies to accelerate the acquisition of personal protective equipment and streamline bringing new diagnostic capabilities to laboratories.
President Donald J. Trump

At this point, Trump was backed into a corner with a “pandemic” wall on one side and a 25th Amendment wall on the other. Backing him into that corner was a rabid U.S. politburo and a rogue intelligence community that had functionally usurped his Article II Executive authority and handed it over to a compromised Department of Defense and a cartel of COVID criminals. The authority for it all derives from the Stafford Act.

2. Public Health Emergency Declaration [PHE]

The significance of the Public Health Emergency Declaration and its continuous string of renewals is critical as outlined in the above section on the Stafford Act. In short, it’s a unilateral decision made at the level of the unelected, appointed and Senate confirmed HHS secretary. The PHE delivers extra-constitutional authority and power well outside of firm constitutional boundaries. At the same time the PHE creates an interface to enmesh the Department of Defense because of the national security implications of a PHE in the contextual form of a pandemic.

Importantly, from the second linked source and relative to the technical term “medical countermeasures,” “under PHE, “medical “countermeasures” are not regulated or safeguarded as normal pharmaceutical products (21 USC 360bbb-3(k): use of EUA-covered medical countermeasure (MCM) products, once designated as such by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (March 10, 2020, retroactive to February 4, 2020) “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.””

This means that the application of the definition of “countermeasures” to the mRNA “vaccinations” opens a portal for legal immunity and establishes a lane to circumvent testing and clinical trials. The net effect is two-fold: 1-human genetic experimentation and 2-biowarfare.

In evidence of my longstanding contention that “COVID-19 is never going away,” the Biden Administration again renewed the PHE on 11 Jan 23, despite Biden stating in September that the “pandemic” was over. In simple terms, this is unmitigated tyranny permitting unfettered biowarfare.

3. Pandemic Declaration

As noted above in examination of the Stafford Act, the 13 Mar 20 Pandemic Declaration that followed the WHO’s lead-out on the same is an element of the Public Health Emergency declaration and is important for the same reasons.

4. Emergency Use Authorization [EUA]

The Emergency Use Authorization is a critical component for the reasons indicated in the examination of the Stafford Act and for considerations of enterprise fraud; especially the issuance of legal immunity granted to mRNA “vaccine” manufacturers like Moderna, Pfizer BioNTech and the others.

The EUA is the primary component to authorize “vaccine” mandates. Without the EUA [and the PHE], those policies could not be recommended by the federal apparatus to be issued and enforced by governors.

Respective to enterprise fraud, infection and mortality data were harvested from comorbidity data reservoirs comprised mainly of flu, pneumonia, diabetes, heart disease and obesity. The harvested data was then fraudulently propagated as COVID-19 data. That data was a critical component to the predication of the PHE and the EUA. Without the fraudulent predication, there could be no PHE and without the PHE, no EUA. COVID-19 would not have qualified as a PHE without the commission of enterprise fraud.

In a brief sidebar, understand that the further commission of enterprise fraud occurs in medical coding process to obfuscate, bury and hide vaccine injuries and deaths. In short, the whole COVID-19 pandemic is fraudulent as I began evidencing in early January 2020.

This means three critical things for the fraudulently predicated EUA [and PHE]: 1-there could be no “pandemic” at all, 2-the DoD would never have been positioned to engage in biowarfare against Americans and 3-any and all immunity granted as a result of the issuance of the PHE and EUA; and their renewals, is vitiated by the Throckmorton doctrine holding that “fraud vitiates everything.”

Applying Throckmorton, “everything” envelops legal immunity. If demonstrable fraud were committed to obtain the PHE and EUA; and legal immunity is derived from them, it is vitiated by Throckmorton.

5. 2005 Prep Act

With immunity remaining in the forefront and from the second linked source [including the image], examine the relationship between the Prep Act, legal immunity and the application of “countermeasures” [emphasis added]: “The contracts for countermeasures include a liability shield for manufacturers and contractors along the supply and distribution chains, under the PREP Act. See example PREP Act clause from Moderna contract. Note the statement at the end about this product being “both civil and military application” (p. 26 here):”

Direct evidence enmeshing the DoD is obtained from the clause in the contract citing “military application.”

In the following, we note the citations to the EUA and PHE as they apply to “countermeasures.” Importantly and as discussed above, view Latypova remarks here as the deliberate circumvention of important policy and law designed to protect Americans, “As prototypes under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) during a PHE, Covid countermeasures need not comply with laws governing clinical trials, manufacturing quality, safety or labeling (21 USC 360bbb-3(k)).”

Importantly and with a citation to the Prep Act, Latypova also remarks how, “the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.”

6. “Countermeasures”

In furtherance of the “countermeasures” details above, Latypova remarks on the importance of the application of “countermeasures” respective to COVID-19 as a matter of national security and the vectors to circumvent legal immunity and protective measures like clinical trials and other safety protocols: “All Covid countermeasures, including the biological warfare agents marketed as “Covid-19 vaccines”, were ordered by the US DoD as a “large scale manufacturing demonstration” via Other Transactions Authority contracts.“

Latypova continues, “Use of Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) covered countermeasures under a declared Public Health Emergency cannot constitute a clinical investigation (21 USC 360bbb-3(k)), therefore these countermeasures could not be tested for safety or efficacy in accordance with US law (21 CFR 312 and 21 CFR 601), nor could compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) or Good Distribution Practices (GxP in general) be enforced by the FDA. This legal fact was known to the US Government, DOD, BARDA, FDA, CDC, HHS officials signing the contracts, involved in the OWS, and it was also known to Pfizer, Moderna and other pharma companies. mRNA technology has always been designated dual-use, a category of bioweapons.”

Note that dual-use pathogens are the substance fo biowarfare. Dual-use pathogens are pathogens that can, for instance, be engineered for use as a vaccine delivery mechanism or bioweaponized as a weapon of war. Biosecurity and oversight bear down hard on dual-use pathogens and I examine those concepts and more in this critical piece and its follow-up: Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules and Obama, LeDuc and UTMB Dangerously Changed Inconvenient Rules in Biosecurity and Broke the Law Doing It.

From Latypova: “According to Operation Warp Speed [OWS] / Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) reports, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) directed, oversaw and managed the development, manufacture and distribution of nearly all Covid countermeasures, largely utilizing DoD’s previously established network of military contractors and consortia. Slides from Operation Warp Speed/BARDA, October 22, 2020:” [Images sourced from Latypova]

7. Other Transaction Authority [OTA] Contracts

Further evidence of the circumvention of laws governing clinical trials, manufacturing quality, safety, etc. is found in how the Department of Defense executed contracts under Other Transaction Authority. OTA is the legal portal to circumvent standard protections for Americans and permit the obfuscation of “intellectual property,” which applies to the technology and ingredients in the mRNA “vaccines.” This is why the standard disclosure forms included in vaccine packaging have been left about entirely blank for the mRNA “vaccines.”

Our source indicates that, OTA is a “method of contracting [that] allows federal agencies to order otherwise-regulated products bypassing any such regulations, as well as financial accountability mechanisms that cover standard government contracting, and other laws that regulate disclosure and Intellectual Property (IP) derived from publicly funded research. “Other” is a catchall category that is not a contract, not a research grant, not a procurement, etc.: not any normally regulated/accountable government contracting.”

The source provides an annotated example “typical” DoD contract for “vaccines” from the first linked publication:

The source indicates the legal immunity carve-out indicating how safety considerations were evaded altogether: While the DOD/BARDA [BARDA discussed below] countermeasure contracts refer to safety and efficacy requirements for vaccines and mention current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) compliance, these items are explicitly carved out as not being paid for nor ordered by the US Government.

Since COVID-19 was classified as a matter of national security, redactions in relative documents occur and they are substantial including in the DoD’s contracts. Consider this from our source and respective to Pfizer, BioNTech and mRNA “vaccines”:

Latypova’s expertise enabled her to determine the context of the redacted portions of the contract that enmesh China vis-a-vis Fosun Pharamaceuticals, which is discussed below: “The first redaction under 1.1.1 BACKGROUND is “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, so the sentence reads “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development…””

We move away from the tedious contractual examination into the broader entities, agencies and departments; including international and private sector ones.

8. World Health Organization [United Nations]

On 06 May 20, I assumed an exclusive stance not found anywhere else: by no later than October 2019, the U.S. was embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war against China that aligned with Chinese doctrine and China’s first priority doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare. This war manifested domestically as the COVID-19 construct of enterprise that aligned with and followed the lead of the WHO. I evidenced that above respective to the PHE and pandemic declarations.

Understand that the WHO is controlled by funding and that puts China and Bill Gates in control of the WHO by means of it.

Therefore, regard the WHO as a compromised international body that was used to compartmentalize aspects of the enterprise fraud outside of the U.S. federal apparatus. Also regard the WHO as a biowarfare vector.

The WHO is headed by and Ethiopian, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Ethiopia’s history with Marxist Communism is important.

China selected and installed Tedros for this reason.

The communist presence in Ethiopia arrived long ago and more importantly, never really left. Generally speaking, the communist period in Ethiopia spans 1974-1991 and per the norm, it began with a military coup d’etat to install a rebel leader with a subsequent full government installation and a full slate of executions.

During the “Red Terror” Soviet-styled communism became fully implemented in the Marxist, Socialist form.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union and on the heels of 9/11, U.S. forces began to train with the Ethiopians opening potentially dangerous diplomatic doors. This coincided with the transition to the focus on Islamic terrorism and the geopolitical entanglements involved therein, which persist today.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is the first non-physician to direct the WHO making him a bureaucrat and not a doctor. Like Tedros, consider that U.S. HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra is also not a doctor, rather he is an attorney; making his expertise legal and not medical. Apply that to the contractual elements of the DoD’s biowarfare against Americans and you begin to understand what exactly is being done to us.

Tedros’ background includes holding two high-level positions in Ethiopia’s government: 1) Minister of health from 2005 to 2012 and 2) Minister of Foreign Affairs (like our Secretary of State) from 2012 to 2016. Specifically, that aligns him with John Kerry, U.S. Secretary of State 2013-2017.

China that propped-up Tedros to become the new WHO director and it was done under suspicious circumstances as the WHO changed its succession procedure for the first time since its inception in 1947.

The net effect had Tedros installed by China and the CCP in a vote that was to be determined by a new procedural voting process and with a fundamental change to vote tabulations.

The controls that adjusted for population differences, which gave all countries equitable pull but not equal pull, were removed with the new procedure giving all countries the same pull no matter their population. The vote then took place electronically and secretly; such that no countries could see how the others voted. Sound familiar? See 2020 and 2022.

The modus operandi for the WHO as a biowarfare vector is that the WHO leads out on policy determinations [masks, lockdowns, vaccines, etc.] and the U.S. federal apparatus [HHS, CDC, FDA, etc.] follows in exact alignment. The net effect is medical tyranny as a direct result of exporting our sovereignty to Marxist communists occupying the WHO and controlled directly by China and the CCP.

9. Department of Human and Health Services [HHS]

The HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra is an unelected, appointed and Senate confirmed bureaucrat who happens not to be a doctor but rather an attorney. The HHS and its secretary are critical for the reasons already mentioned in that Section 319 of the Public Health Services Act permits the HHS secretary to unilaterally determine a Public Health Emergency.

The PHE becomes the hijacking mechanism to functionally usurp the president’s Article II Executive authority in the context of a “pandemic.” Fraudulent data permits the predication of the PHE. The DoD’s biowarfare begins with the HHS secretary’s PHE declaration.

The HHS mission is: “The mission of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is to enhance the health and well-being of all Americans, by providing for effective health and human services and by fostering sound, sustained advances in the sciences underlying medicine, public health, and social services.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s, his NIAID and his lead [and that of a long list of others] in the COVID-19 response was codified under the purview, authority and jurisdiction of HHS.

As Latypova indicates, “From the start, “covid pandemic” was treated by the US Government as a national security matter (i.e. war) and covid policy was set by the National Security Council (assemblage of Defense and Intelligence heads), not HHS.” This means that with DoD in the lead to the whole government response to COVID-19, HHS served as a functionary to DoD contravening what the American people understood the situation to be. Therefore, there is a trickle-down effect to all of the agencies under HHS’s purview, oversight and authority.

View the HHS as the umbrella for the balance of the federal entities, agencies and departments under its codified purview making it a primary DoD biowarfare vector. Consider HHS and all of its subsidiary agencies as weaponized in the DoD biowarfare against Americans.

10. The National Institutes of Health [NIH]

The NIH is, “The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the nation’s medical research agency — making important discoveries that improve health and save lives.”

The NIH mission is: “NIH’s mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability.”

The NIH goals are: “1-to foster fundamental creative discoveries, innovative research strategies, and their applications as a basis for ultimately protecting and improving health, 2-to develop, maintain, and renew scientific human and physical resources that will ensure the Nation’s capability to prevent disease, 3-to expand the knowledge base in medical and associated sciences in order to enhance the Nation’s economic well-being and ensure a continued high return on the public investment in research and 4-to exemplify and promote the highest level of scientific integrity, public accountability, and social responsibility in the conduct of science.”

The more expansive NIH organizational chart can be viewed here.

View the NIH as another umbrella entity for the balance of the federal entities, agencies and departments under its codified purview making it a primary DoD biowarfare vector.

11. The Department of Homeland Security [DHS]

DHS enjoys jurisdiction in COVID-19 relative to its classification as a national security matter and due to emergency response authority: “The Department of Homeland Security has a vital mission: to secure the nation from the many threats we face. This requires the hard work of more than 240,000 employees in jobs that range from aviation and border security to emergency response, from cybersecurity analyst to chemical facility inspector. Our duties are wide-ranging, and our goal is clear – keeping America safe.”

The broader authority of DHS provides interfaces at the Executive and throughout the federal apparatus respective to COVID-19: “The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) efforts have facilitated a speedy, whole-of-government response in confronting COVID-19, keeping Americans safe, helping detect and slow the spread of the virus, and making the vaccine available to as many people as possible. Throughout the pandemic, DHS has worked with the White House, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and state, local, tribal and territorial governments to fight the COVID-19 pandemic and protect the public.”

The DHS response occurs in several domains:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) | USCIS.gov
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) | USCG.gov
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) | CBP.gov
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) | CISA.gov
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) | FEMA.gov
Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) | FLETC.gov
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | ICE.gov
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) | TSA.gov

One of DHS’s domains is “rumor control,” which equates to the legalized progagandizing of the American people according to the Smith-Mundt Modernization of 2012 and the National Defense Authorization Act that President Obama signed into law in May 2016: “Do your part to the stop the spread of rumors by doing three easy things: 1-Find trusted sources of information, 2-Share information from trusted sources, 3-Discourage others from sharing information from unverified sources. To find trusted sources, look for information from official public health and safety authorities. Visit the CDC Coronavirus page to find many official sources. Check your state and local government or emergency management websites and social media accounts for trusted information specific to your area. On social media, be sure to check for a blue verified badge next to the account name, which indicates it’s an official account.”

It’s important to remember that a DHS subsidiary is the Presidential Transition Office, which oversees presidential transition between the outgoing and incoming administrations. Presidential transition law draws back to 1963 relative to the Kennedy assassination. Respective to this, President Obama issued two sunset executive orders specifically permitting the insertion of a pandemic construct into the presidential transition process.

On 11 Jan 17, Dr. Anthony Fauci issued a public statement that the Trump Administration would face a “surprise disease outbreak” and on 13 Jan 17, presidential transition meetings occurred between the outgoing Obama and incoming Trump administrations. Here are the actual slides from that meeting and they look hauntingly familiar to the COVID-19 “pandemic”:

On 24 Oct 19 and respective to his private equity deals with the CEFC China Energy Company, China and the CCP, and his massive anomalous increase in personal income, Joe Biden also predicted a “pandemic” just like Fauci.

Timing always matters and it occurred in the run-up to the 2020 election whereby COVID-19 was the impetus to change elections laws permitting the electoral fraud vectors that stole the election for Biden; installing him as a Chinese proxy. Note that the first MSM report of a viral outbreak in China occurred on 27 Dec 19 and a Tactical Intelligence Report dated 13 Nov 19 evidenced the outbreak at that time.

In between, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi drove the first of two fraudulent impeachment constructs and my exclusive position is that the first impeachment was the deflection point construct away from the implementation of the COVID-19 enterprise fraud construct. Look here, fraudulent impeachment, don’t look here, fraudulent “pandemic.”

DHS offered “vaccine support” through its subsidiary agency, FEMA.

12. Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA]

FEMA is a subsidiary agency of the Department of Homeland Security, which enjoys jurisdiction relative to the national security classification of COVID-19 as well as the emergency response aspects:

FEMA's mission is: "The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employs more than 20,000 people nationwide. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., we have 10 regional offices located across the country. We leverage a tremendous capacity to coordinate within the federal government to make sure America is equipped to prepare for and respond to disasters."

When COVID-19 was classified as a PHE, FEMA was drawn-in as a primary agency. Relative to COVID-19, FEMA functioned, "In alignment with President Biden’s COVID-19 response plan, FEMA will work with the CDC and other federal agencies to coordinate with state, tribal, and territorial authorities, private sector partners and others to assist with the vaccine distribution."

With vaccination as a primary biowarfare method, FEMA serves in a supporting role: "FEMA is supporting vaccination sites by providing expedited financial assistance, providing federal equipment and supplies, and deploying federal personnel to states, tribes, territories, and other eligible applicants for vaccination efforts."

13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]

The CDC is an obvious biowarfare vector for the DoD respective to COVID-19. It's motto is "Saving Lives, Protecting People" and its stated purpose is: "CDC is the nation’s leading science-based, data-driven, service organization that protects the public’s health. For more than 70 years, we’ve put science into action to help children stay healthy so they can grow and learn; to help families, businesses, and communities fight disease and stay strong; and to protect the public’s health."

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-38-840x472.png

CDC is the lead federal agency in vaccine authorization, which also envelops the FDA, and vaccine promotion. Generally, CDC says, "COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States are effective at protecting people from getting seriously ill, being hospitalized, and dying. As with other vaccine-preventable diseases, you are protected best from COVID-19 when you stay up to date with the recommended vaccinations, including recommended boosters. Four COVID-19 vaccines are approved or authorized in the United States: 1-Pfizer-BioNTech, 2-Moderna, 3-Novavax and 4-Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) (CDC recommends that the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine only be considered in certain situations, due to safety concerns.)"

The scope of CDC's vaccine agenda can be read here.

14. Food and Drug Administration [FDA]

This is the FDA mission:

The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices; and by ensuring the safety of our nation's food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.
FDA also has responsibility for regulating the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products to protect the public health and to reduce tobacco use by minors.
FDA is responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medical products more effective, safer, and more affordable and by helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medical products and foods to maintain and improve their health.
FDA also plays a significant role in the Nation's counterterrorism capability. FDA fulfills this responsibility by ensuring the security of the food supply and by fostering development of medical products to respond to deliberate and naturally emerging public health threats.
FDA

Respective to vaccines and COVID-19, The FDA says: "The mission of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is to protect and promote the public health, in part by ensuring the safety and efficacy of the products we regulate. This includes biological products such as prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines, whole blood and blood products, cellular products and exosomal preparations, gene therapies, tissue products and live biotherapeutic agents. CBER also regulates selected drugs and devices used in the testing and/or manufacture of our biological products. In keeping with that mission CBER uses every tool available to help patients access promising biological products while facilitating research to evaluate their safety and efficacy as well as manufacturing efforts."

In short, the FDA authorizes mRNA vaccines without the need for an EUA as predicated by a PHE as predicated by enterprise fraud. This permits the DoD biowarfare vector to widely administer the mRNA "vaccines" in the U.S. Prior to authorization, the EUA is necessary. More can be read here.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-42-840x510.png

For the ubiquitous distribution of vaccines and their administration to the American people without the need of an EUA, the FDA and its approval of mRNA “vaccines” is critical.

16. Presidential Policy Directive 8 [PPD8]

PPD8 is the authority for ASPR, which is detailed next. This is PPD8 noting the overlapping contexts, agencies and departments [emphasis added]:

March 30, 2011
PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-8
SUBJECT: National Preparedness
This directive is aimed at strengthening the security and resilience of the United States through systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation, including acts of terrorism, cyber attacks, pandemics, and catastrophic natural disasters. Our national preparedness is the shared responsibility of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and individual citizens. Everyone can contribute to safeguarding the Nation from harm. As such, while this directive is intended to galvanize action by the Federal Government, it is also aimed at facilitating an integrated, all-of-Nation, capabilities-based approach to preparedness.
Therefore, I hereby direct the development of a national preparedness goal that identifies the core capabilities necessary for preparedness and a national preparedness system to guide activities that will enable the Nation to achieve the goal. The system will allow the Nation to track the progress of our ability to build and improve the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from those threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation.
The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism shall coordinate the interagency development of an implementation plan for completing the national preparedness goal and national preparedness system. The implementation plan shall be submitted to me within 60 days from the date of this directive, and shall assign departmental responsibilities and delivery timelines for the development of the national planning frameworks and associated interagency operational plans described below.
PPD 8 Authored by Barack Obama

15. Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response [ASPR]

This is ASPR noting the overlap with PHEs [emphasis added]: “ASPR leads the nation’s medical and public health preparedness for, response to, and recovery from disasters and public health emergencies. ASPR constantly scans the horizon to prepare for whatever emergency may come next, whether natural or manmade.”

This is ASPR’s Role in the Federal COVID-19 Response: “Within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) is working with our partners to help ensure an equitable response to the COVID-19 pandemic. ASPR provides access to life-saving medicines; deploys medical supplies and equipment from ASPR’s Strategic National Stockpile; and supports the research, development, and acquisition of tests, treatments, and vaccines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, ASPR offers technical assistance, resources, and tools to help public health and medical professionals respond to the pandemic in their communities.”

ASPR provided a critical role regarding vaccination stockpiles, promotion, distribution and administration in the DoD’s engagement in biowarfare against Americans.

17. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority BARDA

BARDA is a subsidiary within ASPR. This is BARDA again noting the overlaps [emphasis added]: “The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) provides an integrated, systematic approach to the development of the necessary vaccines, drugs, therapies, and diagnostic tools for public health medical emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) accidents, incidents and attacks; pandemic influenza (PI), and emerging infectious diseases (EID). Together with its industry partners, BARDA promotes the advanced development of medical countermeasures to protect Americans and respond to 21st century health security threats.”

Relative to the DoD’s biowarfare and the longstanding position that the public:private interface is the portal through which the federal apparatus exports functions it is preventing from achieving due to existing statutes, BARDA is the authority and public:private interface to develop mRNA “countermeasures” in the private sector. Therefore, BARDA is a critical component to the DoD’s biowarfare framework.

More can be learned at BARDA’s “Doing Business with BARDA” page.

18. Operation Warp Speed [OWS]

Noting the obvious overlaps and especially the public:private interface with BARDA on point, Operation Warp Speed is the [emphasis added], “public-private partnership to facilitate, at an unprecedented pace, the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 countermeasures, between components of HHS, including CDC, FDA, NIH, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA); the Department of Defense; private firms; and other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. It will coordinate existing HHS-wide efforts, including the NIH’s ACTIV partnership for vaccine and therapeutic development, NIH’s RADx initiative for diagnostic development, and work by BARDA. Leadership: In addition to the expertise of Dr. Slaoui and General Perna, each countermeasure area will be overseen by a highly qualified and accomplished career HHS scientist.”

Notably and respective to OWS leadership and COVID-19 as a matter of national security with DoD involvement [emphasis added], “the Trump Administration announced the appointment of Moncef Slaoui as chief advisor and General Gustave F. Perna as chief operating officer… Dr. Slaoui is a venture capitalist and, formerly, Chairman of Global Research and Development and Chairman of Global Vaccines at GlaxoSmithKline, where he led the development of five major novel vaccines. As the four-star general in charge of the U.S. Army Materiel Command, General Perna oversees the global supply chain and installation and materiel readiness for the U.S. Army, including more than 190,000 military, civilian, and contract employees.”

19. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [DARPA]

DARPA is the DoD’s research agency for a wise spectrum of advanced domains: “For sixty years, DARPA has held to a singular and enduring mission: to make pivotal investments in breakthrough technologies for national security…Working with innovators inside and outside of government, DARPA has repeatedly delivered on that mission, transforming revolutionary concepts and even seeming impossibilities into practical capabilities. The ultimate results have included not only game-changing military capabilities such as precision weapons and stealth technology, but also such icons of modern civilian society such as the Internet, automated voice recognition and language translation, and Global Positioning System receivers small enough to embed in myriad consumer devices...DARPA comprises approximately 220 government employees in six technical offices, including nearly 100 program managers, who together oversee about 250 research and development programs.”

The work from Dr. David E. Martin, M-CAM evidences DARPA as a primary founding source for Fauci’s work on mRNA “vaccines.”

Latypova’s work indicates the same for DARPA: “In addition, the DoD provided funding and resources to support the development of vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a research arm of the DoD, played a key role in this effort by funding and supporting the development of treatments and vaccines through its “Rapid Response Research” program.”

20. Ft. Detrick

Fort Detrick is the Maryland-based National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC). Ft. Detrick’s mission is: “U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Detrick delivers Army baseline services to sustain vital national missions and Service Members.”

Noting “countermeasures” in the name, Ft. Detrick’s goals have common overlaps: “The US Army Garrison, Fort Detrick, supports five cabinet-level agencies: The Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Health and Human Services. Within the DoD, Fort Detrick supports elements of all four military services. Major Department of the Army mission partners include the US Army Medical Research and Development Command and the 21st Signal Brigade.”

Within Ft. Detrick there is an entity called Battelle, which was ushered-in via the inception of the Department of Homeland Security, which came about with 9/11. This is Battelle within something called the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center; noting again “countermeasures” [emphasis added]: “The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) has developed the science critical to defend the United States against bioterrorism. Managed by Battelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), NBACC is the first laboratory built for DHS – a national resource to understand the scientific basis of the risk posed by biological threats and to attribute their use in bioterror and biocrime events.”

With NBACC outsourcing management to Batelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), the private:public interface applies again. FFRDCs are public:private partnerships which conduct research for the United States Government. They are administered in accordance with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48, Part 35, Section 35.017 by universities and corporations.

In the run-up to the COVID-19 “pandemic” Batelle appointed new leadership in Dr. George W. Korch, Jr. as the new lab director for the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC). Korch’s expertise is managing biodefense labs and biosecurity [read this for deep comprehension: Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules] and his background was with Event 201, which was the tabletop pandemic exercise immediately preceding COVID-19 in October 2019. It was sponsored by the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In short, Ft. Detrick is a U.S. Army biowarfare center threading through NBACC, which is managed by Batelle [BNBI] and where NBACC is a biolab specifically built for DHS. This is a convenient interface to bring DHS directly into biowarfare alongside DoD and extending it to the public:private interface.

21. National Security Council [NSC]

The National Security Council was, “established by the National Security Act of 1947 (PL 235 – 61 Stat. 496; U.S.C. 402), amended by the National Security Act Amendments of 1949 (63 Stat. 579; 50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). Later in 1949, as part of the Reorganization Plan, the Council was placed in the Executive Office of the President.”

The National Security Council is, “the President’s principal forum for national security and foreign policy decision making with his or her senior national security advisors and cabinet officials, and the President’s principal arm for coordinating these policies across federal agencies.”

Biden’s NSC is [emphasis added], “chaired by the President. Its regular attendees are the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations, the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Chief of Staff to the President, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the military advisor to the Council, and the Director of National Intelligence is the intelligence advisor. Counsel to the President and the Legal Advisor to the NSC are invited to attend every NSC meeting. The heads of other executive departments and agencies, as well as other senior officials, including the COVID-19 Response Coordinator and the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, are invited to attend meetings of the NSC when appropriate to address the cross-cutting nature of many critical national security issues, such as homeland security, global public health, international economics, climate, science and technology, cybersecurity, migration, and others.”

The very nature of the members and functions of the NSC create a body to steer the COVID-19 “pandemic” unilaterally and uncontsitutionally in circumvention of existing law.

Latypova indicates that since COVID-19 was classified as a national security matter policy was set by the National Security Council, which is the assemblage of Defense and Intelligence heads, rather than HHS as per the Stafford Act.

Moreover, “March 13, 2020: “PanCAP Adapted U.S. Government COVID-19 Response Plan” (PanCAP-A) states that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 is set not by the public health agencies designated in pandemic preparedness protocols (Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act, PPD-44, BIA), but rather by the National Security Council, or NSC. NSC does not have regular attendees from public health agencies and its focus is national security and foreign policy matters. Below is the organization chart from the PanCAP-A document, p.9:”

22. Department of Defense [DoD]

The DoD is the head of the biowarfare snake: “The Department of Defense is America’s largest government agency. With our military tracing its roots back to pre-Revolutionary times, the department has grown and evolved with our nation. Our mission is to provide the military forces needed to deter war and ensure our nation’s security.”

As already noted, classifying COVID-19 as a matter of national security thrust DoD to pole position and the Executive’s domain as Commander in Chief of the U.S. military bears down with full might respective to Joe Biden [and previously Donald Trump.]

It’s known annual budget is $816.7 billion and it has 3.4 million personnel and it has 4,800 locations in over 160 countries. The Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Office of the Secretary of Defesne and nearly countless others in a leadership capacity bear down.

Contracts are critical to the biowarfare of COVID-19 and the DoD’s contracts can be accessed here.

The positions here hold that rogue elements within the leadership and other aspects of the Department of Defense are responsible for conducting biowarfare against the American people. The DoD has been the primary element of command, control and leadership throughout the entire COVID-19 “pandemic” and long before it.

23. Department of State [DoS]

Diplomacy overlays anything outside of the U.S. and that enmeshes the U.S. Department of State respective to COVID-19 considering its nature as a global “pandemic.”

One aspect of the DoS role is found in Gavi’s COVAX Advanced Market Commitment [emphasis added]:

The United States is committed to leading the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, becoming an arsenal of vaccines for the world, and helping every country build back better. We are reengaging the WHO, boosting vaccine confidence, supporting global distribution of safe and effective vaccines via COVAX, expanding international vaccine manufacturing capabilities, and reforming the Global Health Security Architecture.
No country faces the threat of COVID-19 alone, which is why:
On June 10, President Biden announced that the United States will purchase and donate half a billion Pfizer vaccine doses to 92 low- and middle-income countries as well as the African Union via COVAX. The United States will continue to share doses from our domestic supply as they become available.
On May 17, President Biden announced the United States would donate 80 million vaccine doses to the world by the end of June.
On April 15, the United States co-hosted the “One World Protected” pledge event with Gavi which gathered leaders from across the globe, took stock of progress to date to ensure equitable and accelerated global delivery of COVID-19 vaccines, made the investment case for contributions to COVAX, and encouraged countries and the private sector to make new commitments and galvanize additional resources. Governments and the private sector made pledges to provide more than $300 million in financial contributions, millions of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine doses to be shared through COVAX, and other in-kind assistance.
The United States—through USAID—is leading the world as a top single country donor to Gavi in support of COVAX with a $2 billion contribution to Gavi in March 2021.

More about the foreign aid fraud at USAID can be read here and here.

The DoS role promotes vaccination, ergo biowarfare, worldwide at the same time it exports national sovereignty to foreign entities in the name of the Global Health Security Architcture. Bearing down on this are the WHO international pandemic treaty and One Health, which is a CDC global health initiative: “One Health is a collaborative, multisectoral, and transdisciplinary approach—working at the local, regional, national, and global levels—with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes recognizing the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment.”

24. Gavi

Gavi is, “the Vaccine Alliance helps vaccinate almost half the world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases [and] as part of its mission to save lives and protect people’s health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines, Gavi has helped vaccinate more than 981 million children in the world’s poorest countries, preventing more than 16.2 million future deaths.”

Gavi’s power is derived from several sources including the public:private interface, it’s foundation by Bill & Melinda Gates and its list of working partners. Gavi says that its, “impact draws on the strengths of its core partners, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and plays a critical role in strengthening primary health care (PHC), bringing us closer to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), ensuring that no one is left behind.”

Gavi also, “works with donors, including sovereign governments, private sector foundations and corporate partners; NGOs, advocacy groups, professional and community associations, faith-based organisations and academia; vaccine manufacturers, including those in emerging markets; research and technical health institutes; and implementing country governments.”

It should be noted that the World Bank ties to the issuance of pandemic bonds and patent sharing agreements prior to the COVID-19 “pandemic” [these were the initial fraud vectors in the full body of Moonshine work beginning in the first several articles.] Pulling those strings immediately threaded to George Soros and Bill Gates.

Gavi’s funding is substantial with many overlapping entities:

Gavi intersects with CEPI including in the domain of COVAX; noting common overlaps [emphasis added]: “The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation [and its] mission is to accelerate the development of vaccines and other biologic countermeasures against epidemic and pandemic threats so they can be accessible to all people in need.”

CEPI’s investors and founders paint a clear picture:

CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the World Economic Forum.
To date, CEPI has secured financial support from Australia, Austria, Belgium, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, Ethiopia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Portugal, Philippines, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, USA, and Wellcome.
CEPI has also received support from private sector entities as well as public contributions through the UN Foundation COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund.
CEPI

Both Gavi and CEPI represent plausible vectors for biowarfare, experimentation, vaccine trials and vaccine administration globally and in poor countries.

25. Pfizer BioNTech

The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine is one of four FDA approved vaccines for COVID-19 and one of two that uses mRNA technology, which is the primary culprint for injury and death in vaccine receipients.

From CDC, “There are four approved or authorized vaccines in the United States. 1-Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are mRNA vaccines, 2-Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is a protein subunit vaccine and 3-Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine is a viral vector vaccine and can be given in some situations.”

CDC describes how mRNA “vaccines” work here.

In short, the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA “vaccine” is a bioweapon.

26. Moderna

The Moderna vaccine is one of four FDA approved vaccines for COVID-19 and one of two that uses mRNA technology, which is the primary culprint for injury and death in vaccine receipients. This is noted in the above Pfizer section.

In short, the Moderna mRNA “vaccine” is a bioweapon.

27. Fosun Pharmaceuticals

Fosun Pharmaceutical Group, Shanghai was introduced in section 7 above pertaining to OTA and redactions in the contracts. Therein, Latypova was able to deduce Fosun’s position in the DoD’s biowarfare framework: “I know what is in the redacted part of the above paragraph and it was not hard to figure out. The first redaction under 1.1.1 BACKGROUND is “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, so the sentence reads “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development…” […]Note: the only journalist I am aware of in either “mainstream” or “resistance” who mentioned Fosun was Naomi Wolf, kudos to her. I was in touch with The Epoch Times to try to publish this information, and even they decided to bury the story (but they published my other materials). I did discuss this on Dr. Jane Ruby’s show, and kudos to her as well for not being afraid to cover the truth.”

The parent company Fosun Pharmaceuticals homepage will not open so we access the U.S. Fosun subsidiary homepage: “Fosun Pharma USA Inc., based in Princeton NJ, is led by a team of highly experienced executives with strong track records from leading US and European pharmaceutical companies both in commercial operations and R&D. Fosun Pharma USA today markets a portfolio of specialty pharmaceutical injectable products and ophthalmics and has a pipeline of innovative products. With its core commercial team in place, Fosun Pharma USA is building its commercial presence in the US market. We are now looking for late development stage (phase 2 and beyond) or commercial stage innovative products to in-license/partner with or acquire for the USA market. While we can facilitate a partnership with our parent company for the Chinese market, our clear focus is on US rights for innovative biopharmaceuticals.”

Latypova indicates the partnership between Fosun and Pfizer BioNTech.

Latypova remarks aligns with an enormous body of Moonshine evidence and analysis into China and the CCP [emphasis added], “Pfizer-BioNTech is really a 3-party R&D alliance: Fosun-Pfizer-BioNTech, and by “party” I mean that one of the three is the Chinese Communist Party. Fosun is a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns a large number of global companies, and its chairman Guo Guangchang is a very high ranking member of the CCP. It is curious that the US DoD awarded $10 billion (Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed/DoD/BARDA contract) to a venture whose substantial equity (and IP) holder is the the Chinese Communist Party. For avoidance of doubt:”

Noting that the financials of Pfizer, Moderna and Fosun are addressed below, Latypova examined contracts for them:

Moreover, “The same document describes a data sharing agreement, “pharmacovigilance” globally among the 3 parties. They will count the bodies and share the data with each other:”

Noting the global template, Latypova extends the examination to Israel: “On the “pharmacovigilance” aspect, there is a 4th participant in this arrangement – the Israeli Ministry of Health, which entered into a data sharing agreement with Pfizer on January 6, 2021 and gave Pfizer (and by extension, US DoD and anyone who controls it, BioNTech and anyone who controls it, Fosun and anyone who controls it, i.e. CCP) access to all their citizens’ centralized electronic health records. But don’t worry, Benjamin Netanyahu promised to keep the data de-identified. Right. Side note – Israeli government recently “misplaced” the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Pfizer mentioned in the data sharing agreement above (so we know for sure it exists). The government sadly cannot find it for some reason…”

28. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has been an obvious major player in COVID-19 and worldwide vaccines altogether. The Foundation’s affiliations were noted in the above work.

The Foundation functions in the public:private domain: “We typically hear about two sectors, the public and the private. The private sector – business – is good at developing products and services, while the public sector – government – is good at delivering solutions to all the people who need them. In many cases, the private and public sectors, acting either separately or together, meet people’s needs. But there are gaps, spaces where some people don’t get what they need to live healthy, productive lives. Here’s an example: A generation ago, the market for vaccines worked well in wealthy countries – if you wanted to be immunized against a whole range of diseases, you could – but the system did not work for other parts of the world. Certain vaccines just weren’t available for most people. The private sector didn’t sell them in low-income countries because it wasn’t clear there would be buyers. Governments tried to step in, but they weren’t in a position to bring all the pieces — the funding, the partnerships, the logistics – together to make it work. Tragically, millions of children were dying of preventable diseases each year. This is the kind of problem that philanthropies can help solve, and it’s how we define our foundation’s role.”

The Foundation fact sheet can be read here noting that it has an office in Beijing,
China.

29. China & the CCP

As presented in the first article covering the DoD’s biowarfare against America, I reviewed nn 06 May 20 and exclusive position on China, the CCP and the PLA that has since been condensed to this: “Since no later than October 2019, we’ve been embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war with China along China’s doctrinal and preferred warfare vector, biowarfare.” The article contains the longer version of the position.

Since early 2020, I’ve arduously and thoroughly examined Chinese doctrine and warfare doctrine where biowarfare is China’s stated and first priority warfare vector. In summary and especially in light of evidenced conpsiracy between Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance to bioengineer the SARS-CoV-2 virus compounded by the contractual evidence of the DoD’s relationship with Fosun Pharmaceutical respective to Pfizer and Moderna, it’s clear that China, the CCP and the PLA are integral to the DoD’s biowarfare against Americans.

30. Mainstream media [MSM]

The MSM conspires with the intelligence community and the federal apparatus to produce a severe impediment to the dessimination of the truth and accurate reporting. That multifaceted impediment rests on a foundation of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 and the National Defense Authorization Act, which included the bipartisan bill “Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act,” and which was signed into law in May 2016 by President Barack Obama.

Smith-Mundt revised World War II era policy on propagandizing foreign nations to allow propagandizing the American people domestically and the NDAA provided the context to further weaponize it. That context overlays the exact timeline for the fraudulent “Russian collusion” narrative and its resulting Mueller Special Counsel operation targeting candidate and then President Donald J. Trump.

The net effect is the leveraging of perception management, which is the technical military term for “psychological operations.” This has occurred to the extent that a full-scale and weaponized propaganda machine has been deployed against Americans writ large. It has captured their minds and all but eliminated their ability to think independently and critically; making them functional slaves living in a false reality.

This weaponized propaganda machine plays an enormous role in the destruction, injury and death directly resulting fron the enterpirse fraud and biowarfare of the COVID-19 pandemic. The MSM is a critical piece to the DoD biowarfare framework.

BlackRock & Vanguard

Noting that extensive work at Moonshine has established that BlackRock and Vanguard recur writ large as the two primary institutional holders for essentially every corporate entity examined.

The top two institutional holders for Pfizer are BlackRock and Vanguard.

The 2nd and 3rd institutional holders for Moderna, whose stocker ticker symbol is “MRNA”, are BlackRock and Vanguard. The 1st is Baillie Gifford and Company, which is private.

The 2nd and 3rd institutional holders for Fosun Pharmaceuticals Shanghai are both Vanguard. The 1st is Legg Mason Global Asset Mgt Tr- Martin Currie SMASh Series EM Fd. On 31 Jul 2020, Franklin Resources, Inc. [Franklin Templeton] acquired Legg Mason.

The 2nd and 3rd institutional holders for Franklin Resources, Inc. are BlackRock and Vanguard. The 1st is another common holder implicated in the broader conspiracy, State Street Capital.

The top two institutional holders for State Street Capital are BlackRock and Vanguard.

Concluding Remarks

The Stafford Act which compels the President to defer to his teams of experts when the context of an emergency situation exceeds the scope of his competence and where “presidential competence” is the legal parameter. The “experts” were the Fauci, Birx, Redfield, Pence, et al Coronavirus Task Force better known as the criminal enterprise in the COVID-19 enterprise fraud construct.

The 25th Amendment was already well established in the mainstream narrative and therein, they had President Trump trapped inside of their construct of enterprise fraud. If Trump didn’t follow their lead and rebuffed them altogether, he would have most certainly been removed by the 25th.

Once Trump was trapped and the Task Force set mRNA vaccination as the only out from the construct; and he agreed to move forward in that direction, the Department of Defense inherited the usurped Article II Exectuvie authroity from Trump and leveraged it through a PHE and continuity of government angles to conduct engage in biowarfare against the American people.

This article encompassed the excellent research by Sasha Latypova to augment the existing body of Moonshine work on COVID-19 to evidence the biowarfare framework that the Department of Defense used to engage in biowarfare against the American people from the very beginning of the COVID-19 “pandemic.”

The reality of the COVID-19 “pandemic” far exceed enterprise fraud where the commission of fraud was a mechanism for war and where the war aligns with China’s doctrinal and declared priority warfare vector: biowarfare.

It meant that the American people were under attack in a biowar just as I declared in specific terms on 06 May 20, while the rest of the world was still trying to figure out what SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 were as an illness causing a “pandemic.” They didn’t consider it as an act of war and thus far, it amounts to a fatal mistake.

Americans also didn’t realize that their own Department of Defense was attacking them in the worst imaginable ways. No one did. Now, we know that’s exactly what happened and continues to happen.

There’s a distinct difference between what is happening to us and what is being done to us. Failing to discern that difference amounts to a fatal mistake.

-End-

Pauline C

Your work is incredible. Kind of overwhelming. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Paving the Way

Are you saying the attack was the countermeasure, the original asset or both? Do you have a theory as to how the event started and unfolded? Was this a deliberate or accidental release of something in 2019? Was this a defensive countermeasure exercise to try to stop something or just a game of bio fun for maniacs? We are learning the responsibilities and the functions but nothing about intents, reasons, or goals.

2 more comments...

Political Moonshine's Newsletter

Discussion about this post