Discover more from Political Moonshine's Newsletter
THE KEYSTONE OF CORRUPTION: Projected Scenario Materializing, Biden’s DOJ Offers to Drop 5 of 13 Charges Against Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried
Federal Prosecutors in New York have offered to drop 5 of 13 charges against former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried following a ruling in the Bahamas that permits Bankman-Fried to challenge the additional charges. While America is preoccupied with the arrest of President Trump in the Mar-a-Lago entrapment operation, Biden’s DOJ is making good on a longstanding FTX projection as that scenario is now materializing.
From ABC News emphasis added],
Federal prosecutors in New York said they would drop several criminal charges, at least for now, against disgraced crypto executive Sam Bankman-Fried if the judge agrees to try him later on those charges.
The offer to sever five of the 13 charges followed a ruling earlier this week in the Bahamas that allows Bankman-Fried to challenge the additional charges.
A prosecutor said during a hearing Thursday it was uncertain when the Bahamas would decide whether to consent to the new charges, which included bank fraud and an allegation Bankman-Fried bribed the Chinese.
“Severing those counts seems to be appropriate given the developments in the Bahamas this week,” the prosecutor, Nathan Rehn, said. […]
[Bankman-Fried’s extraditable crimes included] an allegation he paid a $40 million bribe to the Chinese government to unfreeze a trading account.
“We think dismissal of those counts would be the better outcome,” defense attorney Marc Cohen said.
The judge did not immediately rule. […]
“It’s a matter of diplomatic relations between the U.S. and the Bahamas,” Rehn said. “It was an understanding of all the parties involved that this was part of the extradition.”
Aaron Katersky via ABC News
What type of agreement are we talking about from a Judge saying he’ll prosecute indicted crimes at a later date? Is it binding and enforceable? Is there a specific timeline? Are they’re unidentified caveats? Is this a portal to deescalate Bankman-Fried’s criminality where those 5 charges would go without prosecution forever?
Here’s the projected scenario as I reviewed it in December 2022 following Bankman-Fried’s arrest of highly suspicious timing:
Through a discerning lens, the evidence fully indicates that the SBF arrest is a mechanism within the broader cover-up and concealment operation to bury the truth about FTX and so as to protect a wide swath of criminals who were the beneficiaries of the massive FTX/Ukraine money laundering operation that funneled U.S. taxpayer money back to them for their campaigns in the stolen 2022 midterm elections and otherwise. Or, in other words, they used our tax money to steal elections to enslave us. Tell me I’m wrong. Then prove it. I’m not sure that can be done.
What it means is that it is highly likely; if not all but certain, that nothing fruitful is to come out of SBF’s arrest and whereas it only provides us the illusion of the administration of justice and adherence to the rule of law. Application of the discerning lens gives the SBF arrest the appearance of business as usual under the guise of perceived change in Congress. I say don’t buy it. It’s fodder for fools.
To examine how the cover-up operation will deescalate SBF’s criminality into “incompetence” and likely conviction for lesser charges; thus providing a preview of SBF’s defense at trial, pay particular attention to point six in the following new developments.
Here are further developments on the massive FTX/Ukraine money laundering scandal:
Ukraine is the Keystone of Corruption serving as global the global hub of international money laundering at the hands of the politburo and the elite. FTX is a major mechanism in that hub and Joe Biden is FTX’s primary beneficiary. That’s all old had.
What’s new are the Chinese entanglements and they are highly problematic but not necessarily on its face. I’ll paint that picture through the lens of enterprise fraud but first, the particulars.
As Reuters reported in March [emphasis added],
NEW YORK, March 28 (Reuters) – U.S. prosecutors on Tuesday unveiled a new indictment against Sam Bankman-Fried, accusing the founder of the now-bankrupt FTX cryptocurrency exchange of paying a $40 million bribe to Chinese officials so they would unfreeze his hedge fund’s accounts. […]
The new indictment said Bankman-Fried ordered the $40 million cryptocurrency payment to a private wallet from Alameda’s main trading account, to persuade Chinese government authorities to unfreeze Alameda accounts with more than $1 billion of cryptocurrency.
Prosecutors said the Alameda accounts had been frozen as part of an investigation into an unnamed Alameda counterparty, and Bankman-Fried’s prior efforts to lobby Chinese officials to lift the freeze were unsuccessful.
They also said Bankman-Fried around November 2021 authorized a transfer of tens of millions of dollars of additional cryptocurrency to “complete” the bribe.
Recall two longstanding and arduously evidenced positions: 1-Joe Biden is a Chinese proxy and 2-Bankman-Fried has utilitarian value as a conduit to move and launder money internationally via Ukraine as the hub of operations.
Also recall another evidenced position: the energy sector is a conduit to move money internationally [Follow the Money] and Biden used a canned script to set-up operations all over the globe.
Through the lens of enterprise fraud, allow me to paint you a scenario based on factual evidence; much of which you’ll find in my series dedicated to it all: The Keystone of Corruption.
The intelligence community is the umbrella here. Under it is an active Obama enjoying his third; arguably is fourth, term, in the shadows behind Joe Biden.
FTX was created for Sam Bankman-Fried [follow the family] to manage as low-hanging fruit; a pawn in the game. For simplicity, we’ll say Biden owns him in the pejorative sense.
China owns Biden.
Therefore, China pejoratively owns FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried.
The scenario of China freezing SBF’s hedge fund accounts in excess of $1 billion is by all appearances a brokered arrangement; a manufactured scenario; a set-up and therefore, a CONSTRUCT.
In this case, it appears to function as a construct for the commission of further enterprise fraud prosecutable under RICO statute.
FTX is the evidenced hub of money laundering operations from the US politburo to Ukraine and back to the US politburo. It’s all laundered through the conduit of FTX.
FTX already operates as a Biden owned conduit to move money.
Biden is already evidenced to have engaged in similar crimes relative to Ukraine and Burisma.
Biden has engaged in private equity deals; especially in energy and with CEFC China Energy Company being the most damning. This is because CEFC was the economic arm of China’s primary geopolitical and hegemonic doctrine, the Belt Road Initiative or BRI or One Belt, One Road.]
BRI’s political arm is the CCP and its all backed by the PLA.
Examine the top left corner of this and how it threads through the Bidens:
Let me be clear: By all appearances, the Chinese freeze on SBF’s FTX hedge fund accounts exceeding $1 billion was a constructed scenario to permit Biden and the forces behind him to funnel tens of millions to the Chinese, Biden’s principal, in the form of an extorted bribe.
That is a description of a construct.
Here’s something else to think about.
Remember, investigations are opened for two reasons: to expose and prosecute -or- to conceal and cover-up.
The point being that indicting SBF could be a giant evidence vacuum to cover-up Biden/China criminality that threads through the keystone of corruption Ukraine, FTX and their expendable errand boy, Sam Bankman-Fried.
The appearance of something and the evidence to prove it are far different standards and I have no evidence of this position beyond what I’ve already outlined in the series.
Rather, that explanation arrives from logical deduction and the evidence on hand.
Maybe that’s all a moot point.
It seems the Chinese entanglements are being brushed under the rug as they put this pig in a dress and apply lipstick calling it a diplomatic issue in consideration of the Bahama’s jurisdiction and prosecutorial discretion.
As I pointed out back in December, don’t forget who owns the Bahamas:
Who wants to put money on whether we see those 5 charges ever prosecuted?
As I said about FTX back in February, the fix is in and it has been since its unavoidable circumstances began unpacking in the full public spectrum.
We’re watching a controlled demolition of a money laundering conduit to the best landing spot they could whip up out of thin air.
The rest of it is all lies, narrative and cover-up.
And enterprise fraud.