Where Does South Korea’s Martial Law Declaration Fit into World War III Scenario?
ANALYSIS: On Tuesday morning, we all awoke to the declaration of martial law in South Korea. The question becomes, where does South Korean President Yoon’s declaration of martial law fit into WWIII?
On Tuesday morning, we awoke to the declaration of martial law in South Korea by President Yoon Suk Yeol. The equivalent of Congress in the US, South Korea’s National Assembly is barricaded while troops, heavy military equipment and armored personnel carriers patrol the streets of Seoul. The question becomes, where does South Korean President Yoon’s declaration of martial law fit into the World War III scenario?
This is the 237th article in the series WAR, FAMINE & DISEASE.
The answer to that question based upon the examination that follows is:
The declaration of martial law in South Korea by President President Yoon Suk Yeol fits into the broader World War III scenario in ways that fall along historical lines to situate the nation as a Globalist player caught between the hegemonic forces of the US and China and where it appears that the nation is being slotted into position along the emerging sides of a global conflict.
Occam’s prevails to indicate a clearly constructed path to a predetermined outcome of global conflict, which will be prefaced by an initial drawing of sides and immediately envelop additional nations on each side following the initial kinetic flashpoint: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War.
Evidence indicates South Korea is slotting in accordingly.
Evidence indicates that Yoon is a Globalist closely aligned with Joe Biden and his foreign policies.
In one of countless instances, analysis from September 2023 framed the plausible sides for global conflict noting it is not a complete list: “The drawing of sides will be customary in sorting out the allies and alliances that will occur: U.S./E.U./NATO/Israel/Japan/Ukraine/South Korea v. Russia/China/North Korea/Cuba/Iran/Iraq/Syria.”
The political landscape is rooted in opposition to North Korean communism that divides the nation and entangles Yoon.
The martial law declaration may be an indicator that North Korea could engage as a designed trigger mechanism to spark conflict in the region.
Those regional considerations should also include the degree to which any such conflict might impact Beijing’s timeline to move on Taiwan where the US has formal a defense agreement with South Korea, an informal defense agreement with Taiwan and support for both from a Joe Biden who is in the process of tossing a match onto the gasoline he has poured all over the world starting with his proxy war against China’s newest primary diplomatic, economic and military ally, Russia.
This is the same Joe Biden that through private equity and COVID RICO crimes China bought and placed on a leash.
What follows is the logically deduced analysis and evidence supporting these positions.
Get the details on martial law in South Korea:
South Korea President Yoon declares martial law in unannounced TV address – NY Post
South Korea Declares Emergency Martial Law – Zero Hedge
WHERE DOES SOUTH KOREAN MARTIAL LAW DECLARATION FIT INTO THE WORLD WAR III SCENARIO?
Beginning with an admission, the politics of South Korea center on opposition to communism in North Korea and the entanglements of US diplomatic relations with each; and whereby the analysis here is far from expert in those domains.
Our purpose here is to understand the politics of South Korea to a level appropriate in order to examine how the declaration of martial law in South Korea fits into the World War III scenario.
A second admission holds that the supporting evidence for the positions laid-out in this analysis is sufficient for the examination but far from exhaustive.
Let’s begin with the point source and make him our primary lens: South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Through the lens of Yoon, the following domains are examined:
POLITICAL CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
ECONOMIC, SUPPLY CHAIN & NATIONAL SECURITY FACTORS
US DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS & MUTUAL DEFENSE
JOE BIDEN
BIDEN’S IRAN HOSTAGE DEAL
US PROXY WAR IN UKRAINE
An important note on martial law:
Martial law has been declared in South Korea 16 times; the last time was in 1979.
There are two types with distinct differences; noting the difference that matters:
Martial law is divided into two types:
emergency martial law, and
security martial law.
Emergency martial law grants the government sweeping powers, such as suspending the warrant system, restricting freedom of the press, curbing publication rights and limiting assembly and association, as well as overriding the authority of civilian courts and government agencies.
Yoon declared emergency martial law.
Given the scope of the authority delivered by an emergency martial law declaration, Yoon’s motives are highly suspect as will be thoroughly evidenced.
A highly informative piece at The Diplomat is the spine to our examination: South Korea’s Economic Security Dilemma.
1-POLITICAL CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP
The political landscape should be viewed through this lens framed by an extract from The Diplomat:
The intensification of China-U.S. strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific is diminishing space for cooperation and increasing the risk of confrontation between the two powers. As this competition intensifies, states are increasingly finding their autonomy constrained. Fragmentation of supply chains, trade protectionism, and the securitization of emerging technologies, among other issues, are the primary causes of this polarization. South Korea, one of the key powers of the Indo-Pacific, is caught up in this strategic rivalry and has been forced to rethink its earlier posture of strategic ambiguity. Seoul’s cautious policy of strategic ambiguity, manifested in a way that carefully navigates between Washington and Beijing, is now proving to be futile, and geopolitical tensions are incrementally pushing Seoul toward closer strategic alignment with Washington.
[…]
The contest between economic prosperity and security considerations in Seoul’s strategic outlook was a matter of concern even during the Park Geun-hye administration (2013-2017) and became quite prominent during Moon Jae-in presidency (2017-2022), when relations with China turned sour because of the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system in South Korea.
The Zero Hedge piece summarizes the current landscape:
Yoon — whose approval rating has dipped in recent months — has struggled to push his agenda against an opposition-controlled parliament since taking office in 2022.
Yoon’s conservative People Power Party had been locked in an impasse with the liberal opposition Democratic Party over next year’s budget bill. He has also been dismissing calls for independent investigations into scandals involving his wife and top officials, drawing quick, strong rebukes from his political rivals.
All of this is unfolding as President Yoon Suk Yeol’s approval rating continues to slide.
More saber rattling from President Yoon Suk Yeol, as per the Philippines news outlet Rappler:
“Yoon said he had no choice but to resort to such a measure in order to safeguard free and constitutional order, saying opposition parties have taken hostage of the parliamentary process to throw the country into a crisis.
“I declare martial law to protect the free Republic of Korea from the threat of North Korean communist forces, to eradicate the despicable pro-North Korean anti-state forces that are plundering the freedom and happiness of our people, and to protect the free constitutional order,” Yoon said.
South Korean news agency Yonhap News Agency said, “The [South Korean] defense minister has ordered a meeting of key commanders and called for tightened vigilance…after President Yoon Suk Yeol declared emergency martial law. The minister has also ordered the military to stay on emergency guard.”
Note how Yoon situates martial law within notions of democracy, freedom and constitutional order, because it’s the vernacular of Globalist tyranny and it’s what Trump’s opponents have been blathering for years now.
That’s an important distinction because it’s emblematic of how beginning under Obama, the US Intelligence Community/Pentagon/NATO/State Department conglomerate overlaid the US Counterinsurgency Guide as the primary schematic and architecture to begin regime operations in the US just like it has for decades abroad.
What we’re now seeing at home we’ve been witness to in other countries for a long time.
Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine: A Closer Look at the Guide
2-WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
South Korea was introduced as a “Globalist player” and that centers on Yoon, who was invited to address the World Economic Forum in January 2023.
From The Diplomat:
South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, during his special address to the World Economic Forum (WEF), stated that the “Republic of Korea, which boasts the world’s top-notch production technologies and manufacturing capabilities in semiconductor, rechargeable batteries, steelmaking, and biotechnology, will be a key partner in the global supply chain.” That declaration furthers Yoon’s vision of South Korea as a “global pivotal state” and supplements Seoul’s recently released Indo-Pacific Strategy, which is premised on three principles: inclusiveness, trust, and reciprocity.
[…]
Similarly, Seoul’s Indo-Pacific Strategy has a separate chapter for strengthening cooperation in critical domains of science and technology, which emphasizes “engaging in collaborative networks with the U.S. while expanding technology cooperation with Europe, Canada and Australia.”
Yoon is a Globalist because you don’t receive an invitation to speak in Davos and then proceed to say the things he said without being one.
3-ECONOMIC, SUPPLY CHAIN & NATIONAL SECURITY FACTORS
The Diplomat piece provides the lens:
What was earlier confined to geopolitical contestation is now getting entangled with geoeconomics. Since critical technologies have emerged as a strong link between geopolitics and geoeconomics, resilient supply chains, trusted sources, and access to rare earth materials are becoming more vital factors in shaping Seoul’s long-term strategic outlook. Therefore, Seoul’s Indo-Pacific strategy also seems to be an endeavor to provide the leadership enough space to pursue selective cooperation with Beijing to avoid an overly adversarial relationship, while also prioritizing closer alignment vis-à-vis Washington.
[…]
Critical Technologies and Security Considerations : “The rivalry for technological hegemony and the weakening of the multilateral trade system has led to the weakening of the global supply chains,” Yoon stated during his speech at the WEF, acknowledging the changing nature of strategic alignment, which is premised on international norms, rule of law, trust, and supply chain resilience. As states increasingly adopt measures to securitize the technology sector, information and communications technology, artificial intelligence, 5G, and 6G are seen as strategic assets that must be protected from infiltration by foreign adversaries.
This trend of securitizing strategic assets is not limited to the United States but is proliferating in South Korea, fueled by the technology sector’s linkage with national security considerations. Now reliability, trust, and resilience are national security matters, and not just aspirational values.
[…]
This shifting posture can be traced through the South Korea-U.S. joint statements during the Moon and Yoon administration: Under Yoon, the emphasis has been put on working “to prevent the use of advanced technologies to undermine our national and economic security,” moving a step ahead from just “cooperation” during Moon’s administration.
Other key developments that make a case for Seoul’s closer strategic alignment with Washington are South Korea’s semiconductor companies relocation of some investment to the United States; Seoul’s intention to join the strategic CHIP 4 initiative; and South Korea’s participation in the Indo-Pacific Economic Forum (IPEF) and the Washington-led minerals security partnership.
[…]
Beijing perceived Seoul to be taking a more non-aligned posture on the emerging Sino-U.S. technological competition under Moon. However, the U.S. has upped the ante since then – and increased Beijing’s sense of urgency. China has now clearly expressed its opposition to the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Chinese media outlets even warned Seoul that it should “independently formulate its own semiconductor industrial strategies,” adding that “whether South Korean chipmakers will expand or lose market share in China now depends on South Korea’s industrial policy for its semiconductor sector.”
[…]
South Korean trade is heavily dependent on China, its largest trading partner, with semiconductor exports reaching around $42 billion per year. The frictions may also have implications for China-South Korea FTA negotiations in the service and investment sector, raising the risks for Seoul.
[…]
Thus far, South Korea has maintained a balanced trade relationship with China and has benefited from outsourcing manufacturing. With Seoul’s decreasing population, any chances of taking further economic risks would find no unanimous support in either conservative or progressive parties. The need for a bipartisan consensus domestically on how to deal with China vis-à-vis trade persists.
With an understanding of the US’ reliance upon South Korea for technology critical to many things and especially healthcare, the economy and its infrastructure, the power grid, the supply chain and military components, examine the following from a White House press release linked below through the lens of sharing proprietary and sensitive technology information with a partner in mutual defense that maintains its most significant economic and trade relationships with China, which also includes these technology domains.
Then ask yourself is South Korea is a Globalist intermediary and conduit for China and the Globalists?
That appears to the be case, which is greatly aggravated by Biden’s Iran hostage deal discussed below.
4-US DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS & MUTUAL DEFENSE
US hegemony is fortified by a US military that is entirely dependent upon technology and rare earth elements and that makes US hegemony and the US military dependent upon South Korea in ways that directly impact US national security considerations.
From The Diplomat:
Critical Technologies and Security Considerations
“The rivalry for technological hegemony and the weakening of the multilateral trade system has led to the weakening of the global supply chains,” Yoon stated during his speech at the WEF, acknowledging the changing nature of strategic alignment, which is premised on international norms, rule of law, trust, and supply chain resilience. As states increasingly adopt measures to securitize the technology sector, information and communications technology, artificial intelligence, 5G, and 6G are seen as strategic assets that must be protected from infiltration by foreign adversaries.
This trend of securitizing strategic assets is not limited to the United States but is proliferating in South Korea, fueled by the technology sector’s linkage with national security considerations. Now reliability, trust, and resilience are national security matters, and not just aspirational values.
The Diplomat explains the different impacts caused by the current and past US administrations:
Another factor that creates suspicion in Seoul is the lack of political certainty in the United States and the rise of economic nationalism and trade protectionism. Donald Trump’s presidency (2017-2021), and his prioritization of domestic manufacturing, was symbolic of this changing political environment. President Joe Biden has further continued this legacy with the passage of the IRA, showing that the trend of polarization is still intact. With the 2024 U.S. presidential elections approaching, Seoul will be cautious in taking any drastic steps against Beijing.
National security, national defense and mutual defense agreements bear down forcefully.
From my analysis in 2022 we get a snapshot of hegemony and mutual defense agreements as they play-out in the real world: “Another indication of the escalation to war is found in this headline indicating further intensity in the region: US Nuclear-Capable Bombers, F-22 Jets Deploy For Joint Drills Over South Korea.”
Take this quote from The Diplomat through the lens of national defense and national security relative to the US technological dependence on South Korea: “Yoon also acknowledged that the “boundaries between security, economic, and cutting-edge scientific technologies are blurring,” putting high-tech exporters like South Korea in a bind.”
Now apply this:
Defense and Security Considerations: Spoiler in China-South Korea Relations?: Beijing also feels uneasy about the deployment of U.S. regional missile defense systems such as THAAD in South Korea, which undermines China’s nuclear deterrent capabilities. While Beijing has conveyed its concerns directly to Seoul in the past, it also resorted to the use of economic coercion to be more assertive in its approach. As the Yoon administration pursues a policy of strengthening military cooperation within the alliance, it could cause frictions with China.
Seoul and Beijing’s contrasting approaches to responding to nuclear threats from Pyongyang is another point of contention. Earlier, South Korea-U.S. defense cooperation and joint military exercises directed toward North Korea were one factor that irked Beijing, which saw these developments as indirectly targeting China by building Seoul’s defensive capabilities. Those concerns were settled with an agreement on the “Three Nos,” which committed South Korea not to deploy additional THAAD batteries, join a U.S. missile defense network, or sign onto a trilateral military alliance with the U.S. and Japan.
Thus, renewed support in South Korea for the continued deployment of THAAD missiles and calls for building a nuclear arsenal would further strain bilateral relations and will likely impact trade. Based on past precedent, security developments in the Korean Peninsula will overflow into China-South Korea economic relations, and the perception that Seoul seeks to isolate Beijing by restricting exports of critical technologies will further fuel misunderstandings.
The Diplomat
If South Korea is compromised to the level indicated by the evidence, it’s highly problematic to US national defense and national security.
Ultimately, it is the US mutual defense treaty with Korea that stands to most greatly impact the trajectory for global conflict.
The US and South Korea executed the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea on 01 Oct 53.
On 13 Nov 23, the US Department of Defense issued Defense Vision of the U.S.-ROK Alliance.
It states, “In 1953 the United States and Republic of Korea (ROK) signed the Mutual Defense Treaty pledging to promote peace, defend against external threats, and strengthen collective defense in the Pacific region. Seventy years later, the U.S.-ROK Alliance now stands as one of the world’s premier alliances.”
If Yoon’s martial law declaration is shaped into a defense to counter foreign hostile aggression from North Korea, which is directly/indirectly already in conflict with the US in Ukraine or other foreign hostiles, it’s opens a window to the Mutual Defense Treaty.
That reflects on the position of South Korea being slotted for global war.
5-JOE BIDEN
For anyone with a factual understanding that Joe Biden is a global crime pimp working for the Big Boss[es] and using his son Hunter as the bag man – AND THAT ALONE EXPLAINS JOE’S RECENT PARDON WHERE LITERAL TREASON FACTORS IN – it necessitates the application of scrutiny and discernment to identify ulterior motives and objectives, which is the nature of investigating fraud and where enterprise fraud prosecutable under RICO statue underpins everything these criminals do.
It makes RICO prosecutions of the fraudulent COVID-19 “pandemic” and the election FRAUD it delivered as the primary mechanism to steal the 2020 election THE SOLUTION TO MANY OF OUR PROBLEMS.
I’m looking respectfully and directly at you, Mr. Trump: An Open Letter to President Trump, A Call to Action on COVID-19.
A SIDEBAR EXPLANATION:
From a meeting early in the first year of Biden’s one disastrous term, Yoon hosted the President in South Korea in May 2022, making it a clear priority for the Biden Administration:
[Source: White House Press Brief: United States-Republic of Korea Leaders’ Joint Statement]
President Yoon Suk Yeol welcomes President Joseph R. Biden to the Republic of Korea (ROK), marking the earliest meeting in a ROK President’s term in office with the President of the United States (U.S.). Founded in our shared sacrifice and honed by our deep security ties, the Alliance between the Republic of Korea and the United States continues to evolve and expand. The linchpin for peace and prosperity in the region, the Alliance has grown far beyond the Korean peninsula, reflecting the pivotal role of our countries as global leaders in democracy, economy, and technology. Faced with existential challenges like climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic, and growing threats to the rules-based international order, foremost among which is Russia’s further aggression against Ukraine, the Republic of Korea and the United States are unified in common determination to deepen and broaden our political, economic, security, and people-to-people ties.
The two Presidents deeply appreciate the recent accomplishments of the Alliance and pledge to continue building off of its rock solid foundation.
The Linchpin for Peace and Prosperity
President Yoon and President Biden reaffirm their mutual commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea and the combined defense posture under the ROK-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty. President Biden affirms the U.S. extended deterrence commitment to the ROK using the full range of U.S. defense capabilities, including nuclear, conventional, and missile defense capabilities. The two Presidents also agree to reactivate the high-level Extended Deterrence Strategy and Consultation Group at the earliest date. Both leaders commit to further strengthen deterrence by reinforcing combined defense posture, and reiterate commitment to a conditions-based transition of wartime operational control. With this in mind, and considering the evolving threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), both leaders agree to initiate discussions to expand the scope and scale of combined military exercises and training on and around the Korean Peninsula. Both leaders also reaffirm the commitment of the U.S. to deploy strategic U.S. military assets in a timely and coordinated manner as necessary, as well as to enhance such measures and identify new or additional steps to reinforce deterrence in the face of DPRK destabilizing activities. In this vein, the United States and ROK will significantly expand cooperation to confront a range of cyber threats from the DPRK, including but not limited to, state-sponsored cyber-attacks.
President Yoon and President Biden reiterate their common goal of the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and agree to further strengthen the airtight coordination to this end. The two Presidents share the view that the DPRK’s nuclear program presents a grave threat not only to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula but also the rest of Asia and the world. Both leaders condemn the DPRK’s escalatory ballistic missile tests this year, including multiple launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles, as clear violations of United Nations Security Council resolutions and reaffirm their joint commitment to work with the international community to urge the DPRK to abandon its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs.Both leaders urge all UN Member States to fully implement all United Nations Security Council resolutions and also call on the DPRK to abide by its obligations under UN Security Council resolutions as well as its previous commitments and agreements.
President Yoon and President Biden emphasize that the path to dialogue remains open toward peaceful and diplomatic resolution with the DPRK and call on DPRK to return to negotiations. President Yoon outlined his vision to normalize inter-Korean relationship through an audacious plan aimed at a denuclearized and prosperous Korean peninsula and President Biden expresses his support for inter-Korean cooperation. Both leaders underscore the importance of ROK-U.S.-Japan trilateral cooperation for responding to the DPRK’s challenges, protecting shared security and prosperity, upholding common values, and bolstering the rules-based international order.
The Biden Administration positions South Korea as the key component to regional security in calling it the “linchpin for peace.”
The linchpin is now locked down under martial law so what does that foretell for the region of the Korean Peninsula?
Denuclearization is a critical component to understand and Ukraine is the perfect analog to understand it in the sense that denuclearizing creates a power vacuum and where the Intelligence Community/Pentagon/NATO/State Department conglomerate breaks nations apart, engages in regime change operations and denuclearizes, it fills the vacuum with NATO/US military under the guise of “mutual defense.”
Returning to the context of the South Korean political landscape and the position of martial law being declared to control pro-North Korean political opposition and where North Korea could engage to become the spark for conflict, the Yoon-Biden meeting set the parameters in agreements on denuclearization in calling North Korea to the table.
This dynamic could be the pretext:
President Yoon and President Biden emphasize that the path to dialogue remains open toward peaceful and diplomatic resolution with the DPRK and call on DPRK to return to negotiations. President Yoon outlined his vision to normalize inter-Korean relationship through an audacious plan aimed at a denuclearized and prosperous Korean peninsula and President Biden expresses his support for inter-Korean cooperation. Both leaders underscore the importance of ROK-U.S.-Japan trilateral cooperation for responding to the DPRK’s challenges, protecting shared security and prosperity, upholding common values, and bolstering the rules-based international order.
“Rules-based international order” is the vernacular of Globalists and criminals who tailor the order to produce predetermined outcomes to their favor.
COVID-19 was the constructed mechanism of enterprise fraud leveraged to engage in ubiquitous and pervasive voter fraud as the process to subvert a US election and install Joe Biden as a proxy.
Through a true lens, this statement from the press release defines co-conspirators in RICO crimes: “Both leaders express concern over the recent COVID-19 outbreak in the DPRK. The ROK and the U.S. are willing to work with the international community to provide assistance to the DPRK to combat the virus.”
President Yoon and President Biden pledge to support in strengthening multilateral efforts to prevent, prepare, and respond to infectious disease threats. President Yoon underscored President Biden’s leadership in convening the Global COVID-19 Summit in May 2022, and President Biden appreciated President Yoon’s active participation and ROK’s announced pledges, including funding for the Act-Accelerator to combat COVID-19 and support for the Financial Intermediary Fund for pandemic preparedness and global health security at the World Bank. President Biden welcomes the ROK’s decision to host a Global Health Security Agenda ministerial meeting this Fall and establish a GHS coordinating office for global and regional sustainable health security in Seoul. Our countries will also increase efforts bilaterally and in multilateral fora to promote biosafety and biosecurity norms. The U.S. and ROK will also strengthen health systems and build on successful health sector collaboration to accelerate cooperation and innovation in cancer research, cutting edge cancer treatments, mental health research, early detection, and treatment of mental health disorders.
You noted World Bank?
It’s the same World Bank that issued “pandemic bonds” before COVID-19 as I explained on March 7, 2020, 6 days before the even made a pandemic declaration?
The single greatest scheme of enterprise fraud ever devised to generate profits is climate change.
To that, apply this:
“Acknowledging the existential threat posed by climate change, President Yoon and President Biden reaffirm their commitments to their announced nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement including the 2030 greenhouse gas reduction targets and 2050 net zero emission goals with strong efforts to align policies across sectors.”
Yoon is a Globalist but there is more to cover.
Consider these domains as they apply to election interference and rigging a nation’s government whether it be theirs or ours:
President Yoon and President Biden will continue to deepen ROK-U.S. cooperation on regional and international cyber policy, including cooperation on deterring cyber adversaries, cybersecurity of critical infrastructure, combatting cybercrime and associated money laundering, securing cryptocurrency and blockchain applications, capacity building, cyber exercises, information sharing, military-to-military cyber cooperation, and other international security issues in cyberspace.
Yoon and Biden even reached agreement on one of three projected theaters for the global conflict – China, Taiwan and the South China Sea:
President Yoon and President Biden reaffirm their commitment to maintain peace and stability, lawful unimpeded commerce, and respect for international law including freedom of navigation and overflight and other lawful use of the seas, including in the South China Sea and beyond. The two Presidents reiterate the importance of preserving peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait as an essential element in security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. Sharing our mutual concerns regarding human rights situations in the Indo-Pacific region, both leaders commit to promote human rights and rule of law globally.
Biden is a Globalist criminal and so is Yoon and that makes his martial law declaration problematic through the lens of ulterior motives and outcomes.
6-BIDEN’S IRAN HOSTAGE DEAL
Take what has been examined thus far and overlay it with the following.
This is from my article Pots, Spoons & World War III written in October 2023:
Per the designed norm, it’s a tangled web: 1-Biden as a Chinese proxy and point man for Obama’s third and arguably fourth term 2-compounded and aggravated by both Obama and Biden funding the Palestinians 3-ergo funding Hamas 4-as a proxy front for Iran, 5-which Obama also funded in the billions 6-and aided with the JCPOA. 7-The recent U.S. hostage exchange negotiation with Iran also bears down as a funding mechanism where the Biden Administration released $6 billion in frozen Iranian oil revenues as a part of the deal.
The deal emerged after months of indirect negotiations between U.S. and Iranian officials. As part of the deal, the U.S. also released $6 billion in frozen Iranian oil revenues, transferred from banks in South Korea to Qatar, an energy-rich nation on the Arabian Peninsula that is an ally of both nations. The U.S. and Iran have no formal diplomatic relations. The funds are intended to be used for humanitarian purposes only.
USA Today
A seasoned investigator and analyst specializing in fraud will suggest to you that the U.S. is engaged in a similar racket [RICO] as found in Ukraine, where war is manufactured in part to interface with NGOs directly or indirectly owned and operated by those who foment war to create a conduit to launder and receive back U.S. monies designated for humanitarian aid arising out of the constructed war.
Also see the FTX scandal.
Catching on yet, America?
Ukraine is a massive money laundering hub knowing that when someone launders money, it’s normally to make backdoor payments through layered shells, intermediaries and conduits.
By all indications, Joe Biden is a Globalist criminal, Iran is at his discretion as the Middle East “boogeyman” and pot stirrer, and Yoon of South Korea is a conspirator.
Look back up at the areas of cooperation, which includes MONEY LAUNDERING and where DOJ covers-up sensitive matters by opening “investigations” into them – that’s what’s going on in Ukraine and that’s what FTX/Sam Bankman-Fried was all about: The Keystone of Corruption.
How much interest was earned off the $6 million being held by South Korean banks before it was release back to Iran and is there any way it represents an intermediary conduit?
A lot and yes, that is a plausible consideration.
Do any of those banks tie directly or indirectly back to the Biden Crime Family or its associates?
Where there any kickbacks involved?
There are many questions to be answered.
Ownership of those banks is an important data point.
7-US PROXY WAR IN UKRAINE
Yoon cites North Korea’s communist advancement as the predication for the martial law declaration in South Korea and that is a direct thread to the US Proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, in which North Korea has direct involvement on the side of Russia and China.
For South Korea, it has a mutual defense agreement with the US and its primary economic partner is a regional one in China.
For these reasons, Yoon has supported the war in Ukraine drawing the line at the provision of arms and personnel, which causes the pot to boil over and where Yoon is pulled from two directions.
Each direction is a nuclear superpower fighting the other and standing behind one of those nuclear superpowers is another.
From a different piece at The Diplomat: South Korea’s Deepening Dilemma Over Ukraine:
Initial incredulity on the South Koreans’ part gradually turned into consternation, as clips circulating online showed scrawny North Koreans, uttering undeniably fluent Korean, in Russia.
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) confirmed that Russia’s Pacific Fleet and transport aircraft had fetched 1,500 North Korean special forces to training bases in Russia’s Far East. Pyongyang also dispatched some 4,000 laborers to further bolster Russia’s war-making capacity.
They were the first vanguard batch of what has since peaked to around 12,000 North Korean troops, equivalent to four brigades. Most of them are now stationed in Kursk, a Russian region bordering Ukraine’s northeast where claims of first skirmishes between Ukrainian and North Korean combatants have arisen since early November.
[…]
North Korea’s military involvement in Ukraine and the concomitant escalation are unprecedented and shocking in scale. This came on top of Pyongyang’s shipment of anti-tank missiles, short-range ballistic missiles, rocket-propelled grenades and over 8 million artillery shells to Russia.
[…]
South Korea’s President Yoon Suk-yeol and his administration has been feeling the pressure of responding in one way or another to the altering geopolitical, security, and legal circumstances. So far, it has limited its aid to non-lethal materiel, such as combat care medical kits and protective gear and demining hardware, and to humanitarian support for refugees and reconstruction. In 2023, Yoon mused out loud about the possibility of providing lethal weapons if Russia perpetrated “any large-scale attack on civilians, massacre, or serious violation of the laws of war.”
The full article at The Diplomat goes on to detail the political entanglements and the contentious infighting within the National Assembly in application of South Korean law relative to the escalation towards providing direct personnel and arms to Ukraine.
On the other hand, the Republic of Korea Constitution demands the legislature’s approval for overseas deployment of armed forces.
That’s the same National Assembly barricaded off following the declaration of martial law by South Korean President Yoon.
FINAL REMARKS
We are required to keep a close eye on South Korea following the declaration of martial law by President Yoon, who by all indications is a Globalist player and functionary in close alignment with Joe Biden, who seems intent on sparking global conflict on his way out of office.
It remains to be seen what the operational objectives of South Korea’s martial law declaration may be.
One strong indicator to determine that is North Korea’s engagement and impact on the Korean Peninsula.
Follow-up analysis will be forthcoming as developments unfold and more is known or can be determined.
Yoon is a Globalist like Biden.
All eyes on South Korea.
-End of new content-
CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP
Chronology
The war escalation chronology that began in late December 2020 [From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War] intensified beginning 17 Nov 24 and it entails:
17 Nov 24: Joe Biden’s Sunday authorization for long-range missiles against Russia: Trump Details Plan to “Dismantle the Deep State,” Deep State Counters by Crossing Putin’s Line on Long Range Missiles.
19 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Tuesday leveraging of Biden’s authorization to strike Russia with US long-range missiles: US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat.
20 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Wednesday firing of 12 UK [NATO] Storm Shadow missiles at Russia targeting the Kursk region in Southern Russia: 12 UK Storm Shadow Missiles Were Fired Into Russia, Local Sources Say.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s retaliatory ICBM strike against Ukrainian [NATO?] military targets: Russia Fires ICBM Into Ukraine For First Time, Kiev Claims.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday attack on Ukraine using hypersonic missiles with MIRV technology: REPORT ACCELERATES ALREADY EXPEDITED WWIII TRAJECTORY: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday advisement that a US/NATO missile base in Poland [NATO ally] that became operational this month [reported last Saturday] has been classified as a potential priority strike target: Putin Validates War Analysis: The world stands on the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war.
22 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Friday cancellation of regular parliament session to set emergency talks with NATO [from Breitbart]: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
24 Nov 24: Ukraine’s overnight Sunday strikes deep inside of Russia with ATACMS long-range missile systems provided by the United States: REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia.
26 Nov 24: Ukraine and NATO hold emergency talks with an outcome defaulting to perpetual war and trending towards a chemical/nuclear entrapment scenario: All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike and NATO and Ukraine Emergency Talks Result in Default to Previous Stance, Escalations Ease for Now, Russian Counterstrike Still Looms.
27 Nov 24: Putin addressed the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Summit in Astana to lay-out plausible Kiev-based targets for Russia’s looming counterstrike: Decision-making centers in Kiev could be targeted in Oreshnik strikes — Putin.
28 Nov 24: Russia carries-out counterstrike in Ukraine in response to ATACMS strikes deep inside Russia deploying 100 drones and firing 90 missiles targeting Ukrainian power infrastructure and causing widespread blackouts affecting 1 million people: Putin Threatens Ukrainian Capital With New Hypersonic Missile.
29 Nov 24: Zelensky goes full circle on an expedited timeline to reposition Ukraine’s NATO membership as a trigger for global war: Zelenskyy Offers To End ‘Hot Phase’ Of War In Exchange For NATO Membership.
30 Nov 24: IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate engages in political protest for fuel regime change operations in former Russian satellite state and current target for NATO membership Georgia: Many thousands rally to oppose Georgian government after break with EU.
01 Dec 24: Jake Sullivan vows to “get Ukraine all the tools we possibly can to strengthen their position on the battlefield”: Sullivan Touts ‘Massive Surge’ In Arms To Ukraine With 50 Days Left In Biden’s Term.
02 Dec 24: China aligns with Russia in Syria: China vows support for Syria.
02 Dec 24: Russia rejects West’s concept of a “ceasefire” as a long-term solution for peace: Lavrov dismisses West’s ceasefire idea: ‘not a path to peace’.
02 Dec 24: Russia ends the lull to resume operations inside Ukraine carrying out strikes against military targets: Russian forces strike Ukrainian military airfields, UAV control posts over past day.
03 Dec 24: Globalist and Biden ally President Yoon declares martial law in South Korea: South Korea President Yoon declares martial law in unannounced TV address.
Established Cycle
As indicated in the analysis and with war reciprocity bearing down, the established cycle is roughly 24 hours.
With a 24-hour turnover in the cycle and during this period of marked intensification, the analysis here is being published daily in the late morning or after.
Analysis
Here is the analysis for the 2-week escalation period:
Manufactured Insanity of World War III Escalates, ICBMs for 1st Time Ever, Where Does This End?
WORLD WAR III: US Officials Discuss Nuclear Armament for Ukraine as Russian Deterrence Strategy
REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia
All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike
Before Ukraine There was Georgia, West Intensifies Pressure on Russia with Regime Change Operations
Full Analysis
To view the aggregate analysis chronologically, see the War, Famine & Disease series.
5-Stage Linear War Trajectory
The analysis laid-out 5 plausible outcomes and where time is taken time to identify ones already eclipsed: 1-threat of war, 2-limited scale regional war, 3-full scale regional war, 4-limited scale global war and 5-full scale global war.
The outcomes posed represent a LINEAR TRAJECTORY from the THREAT OF WAR to FULL SCALE GLOBAL WAR.
The analysis indicates our current placement on the linear trajectory of 5 outcomes: CURRENT PLACEMENT: Resting on the transition line between a full scale regional war and a limited or full scale global war.
-End-
There was on person keeping up to date on what was happening with South Korea's National Assembly in Tore's chat today. They voted for to suspend martial law.
https://t.me/toresaysPlus/65850
https://t.me/toresaysPlus/65850?comment=5298424
My first reaction to this news is that Emergency Martial Law is being normalized to save Democracy. If Yoon is a Globalist, than it makes sense. All the Biden Regime needs is a credible and highly threatening False Flag, to attempt this move in America. Anything to keep Trump out of office.