WORLD WAR III: US Officials Discuss Nuclear Armament for Ukraine as Russian Deterrence Strategy
ANALYSIS: As an overlay to the events of last week to the present, reporting from the New York Times indicates that US officials have considered arming Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
Today marks the beginning of the second straight week where significant escalations in the incremental march to World War III that began with a foreign policy shift by the incoming Biden Administration in late December 2020 stand to drive the world to the unthinkable: a full-scale nuclear global conflict. Therein, it’s imperative to remember that tomorrow, NATO and Ukraine will host “emergency talks” to presumably formulate its response to a Russian hypersonic missile attack last Thursday. The events of last week are critical to understand as the contextual backdrop to this most recent nuclear development and to the broader US proxy war against Russia. As an overlay to the events of last week to the present, consider reporting from the New York Times indicating that, US officials have considered arming Ukraine with nuclear weapons as a deterrence strategy against Russian aggression.
This is the 228th article in the series War, Famine & Disease.
CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP
The contextual backdrop has pulled from yesterday’s analysis and augmented to bring to current.
NEW DEVELOPMENTS are discussed in the next section.
The aggregate analysis can be read here – War, Famine & Disease – and important aspects of this week and the rapid fire incremental escalations to WWIII are laid-out:
ANALYSIS: LAST WEEK INTO THIS WEEK
CHRONOLOGY: LAST WEEK INTO THIS WEEK
The war escalation chronology entails:
Russia’s retaliatory ICBM strike against Ukrainian [NATO?] military targets: Russia Fires ICBM Into Ukraine For First Time, Kiev Claims.
Joe Biden’s Sunday authorization for long-range missiles against Russia: Trump Details Plan to “Dismantle the Deep State,” Deep State Counters by Crossing Putin’s Line on Long Range Missiles.
Ukraine’s Tuesday leveraging of Biden’s authorization to strike Russia with US long-range missiles: US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat.
Ukraine’s Wednesday firing of 12 UK [NATO] Storm Shadow missiles at Russia targeting the Kursk region in Southern Russia: 12 UK Storm Shadow Missiles Were Fired Into Russia, Local Sources Say.
Russia’s Thursday attack on Ukraine using hypersonic missiles with MIRV technology: REPORT ACCELERATES ALREADY EXPEDITED WWIII TRAJECTORY: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
Russia’s Thursday advisement that a US/NATO missile base in Poland [NATO ally] that became operational this month [reported last Saturday] has been classified as a potential priority strike target: Putin Validates War Analysis: The world stands on the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war.
Ukraine’s cancellation of regular parliament session to set emergency talks with NATO [from Breitbart]: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.
5-STAGE LINEAR WAR TRAJECTORY
The analysis laid-out 5 plausible outcomes and where time is taken time to identify ones already eclipsed: 1-threat of war, 2-limited scale regional war, 3-full scale regional war, 4-limited scale global war and 5-full scale global war.
The outcomes posed represent a LINEAR TRAJECTORY from the THREAT OF WAR to FULL SCALE GLOBAL WAR.
The analysis indicates our current placement on the linear trajectory of 5 outcomes: CURRENT LOCATION: Resting on the transition line between a full scale regional war and a limited or full scale global war.
IMPACT ON THE LINEAR WAR TRAJECTORY: The outcome of the NATO/Ukraine emergency talks set for Tuesday will immediately impact the trajectory to project forward noting that the caveat would be any further incremental escalation[s] by either Russia or NATO/Ukraine that would intercede on the talks before they take place.
In that scenario, one side or the other would be compelled to counterstrike if provoked by strikes from the other side.
POINTS OF EMPHASIS
Major aspects of this week’s analysis and points of emphasis include:
War Reciprocity
The Poland development is latest direct evidence of the incremental war reciprocity examined so closely in this week’s analysis of the linear war trajectory ranging from the THREAT OF WAR to FULL SCALE GLOBAL WAR.
Timeline & Projected Timeline
The expedited timeline and this week’s acceleration of it are analyzed relative to the kinetic flashpoint for WWIII that was projected long ago.
There are two parts: 1-the existing projection of 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months as framed by the 20 Jan 25 inauguration of Donald J. Trump.
The timing plugs into the second point of emphasis.
Point of Emphasis-1
“Where is the threshold line to break Putin’s measured and calculated restraint? [Undetermined but encroaching closely on it. Best call: US is baiting Russia into a military response, which will be co-opted into a false-flag operation and positioned as a nuclear strike on Ukraine with attribution to Russia. This would permit strikes or counterstrikes on Russia depending on how it unpacked and that is the operational objective. Plenty of nuclear red lines already exist as issued by Biden and Putin so the existing pretext for such an operation is robust.]”
Most concerning could be the ability of the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate to carry-out false flag operations that would box Putin in, force his hand and leave him no other options as described.
Point of Emphasis-2
It’s a race against time to see if Donald Trump can survive to be inaugurated and as Commander in Chief to intercede on this deliberate and insane 4-year march to Armageddon by Joe Biden and the Biden Administration as a proxy for the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate.
The race is defined by our existing projection of 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months as framed by the 20 Jan 25 inauguration of Donald J. Trump.
NEW DEVELOPMENT & IMPACT ON EXISTING SCENARIO
On 21 Nov 24, the New York Times reported the following, which begins with a hallmark aspect of the aggregate war analysis that began in late 2020: NATO’s generational encroachment on Russia’s national security and sovereignty; especially as it relates to Ukraine’s highly sought after NATO membership,
The one gold-standard security guarantee that Ukraine wants is an invitation to join NATO. But it could not get that under Mr. Biden, and an invitation is unlikely during Mr. Trump’s presidency.
So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire.
Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications.
President Donald Trump’s electoral victory is a significant impediment to a 4-year designed march to WWIII by the Intelligence/Pentagon/NATO/State conglomerate where in his first term, Trump established and maintained normalized relations with Russia and Vladimir Putin at the same time he put Beijing and Xi Jinping on tight a leash.
Not by coincidence, the foreign policy shift by the incoming Biden Administration in late December 2020 was away from Trump’s hyperfocus on China and back to NATO’s favorite generational boogeyman, Russia: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War.
As indicated in the past week’s analysis, this is our current location on the 5-stage linear trajectory to WWIII [The analysis laid-out 5 plausible outcomes and where time is taken time to identify ones already eclipsed: 1-threat of war, 2-limited scale regional war, 3-full scale regional war, 4-limited scale global war and 5-full scale global war]: CURRENT LOCATION: Resting on the transition line between a full scale regional war and a limited or full scale global war.
ANALYSIS
Recall what was laid-out in the analysis of 19 Nov 24 and is featured as the first point of emphasis above the Contextual Backdrop section: US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat.
Where is the threshold line to break Putin’s measured and calculated restraint? [Undetermined but encroaching closely on it. Best call: US is baiting Russia into a military response, which will be co-opted into a false-flag operation and positioned as a nuclear strike on Ukraine with attribution to Russia. This would permit strikes or counterstrikes on Russia depending on how it unpacked and that is the operational objective. Plenty of nuclear red lines already exist as issued by Biden and Putin so the existing pretext for such an operation is robust.]
Consider the nuclear false-flag postulation as a trap and arming Ukraine with nuclear missiles as the bait for that trap.
Overlay the analysis from September 2022 that positioned statements made by Joe Biden on 60 Minutes: The Multiple-Front War Scenario Maintains Intensity.
Consider these statements by President Joe Biden as pretext for a known and anticipated nuclear event, meaning they are sowing the context for the outbreak of war occuring along the lines of the Russian’s using nuclear weapons. This bears the hallmarks of a false-flag operation where a nuclear event could be made to happen to be erroneously attributed to Russia as justification to take Russia to war. This is from Zero Hedge,
In a Sunday “60 Minutes” interview to air in full Sunday night, President Joe Biden issued a warning for Russian President Vladimir Putin to not “change the face of war” by employing either tactical nuclear or chemical weapons against Ukraine.
“Don’t. Don’t. Don’t. You will change the face of war unlike anything since World War II,” Biden said while speaking to CBS interviewer Scott Pelley. Biden was responding to a question from Pelley on what the US president’s message would be if he learned that Putin was contemplating use of weapons of mass destruction.
Biden stopped short of saying expressly that the US would jump into the conflict more directly against Russian forces, but he stipulated “it’ll be consequential” and that the end result would be: “They’ll become more of a pariah in the world than they ever have been.” SOURCE
FINAL REMARKS
The September 2022 analysis indicated a highly plausible nuclear false-flag operation to entrap Putin and Russia into a predetermined nuclear response.
Therein, Biden issued a nuclear ultimatum.
Since then, Biden has marched in lockstep to a kinetic flashpoint to a global nuclear conflict [and we’ve tracked every step: War, Famine & Disease].
Now, Biden wants to provide Ukraine with nuclear weapons to further threaten Russia’s national security and sovereignty under the guise of deterrence.
In actuality, Biden’s move comes as a calculated measure inside an entrapment operation that is designed to bait Russia into a predetermined nuclear response of which Putin as repeatedly warned.
If Joe Biden isn’t trying to provoke Russia into the thermonuclear war that the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate seems so desperate to have, then what in the the hell is he doing?
The first step to answering that question is realizing that Joe Biden has nothing to do with this beyond a mugshot.
The second step to answering that question is realizing that the answer is contained within the question – the IC/DoD/NATO/State conglomerate needs this war as the analysis has repeatedly indicated including this from December 2022 and its truer today than it was then [from War At All Costs]:
Here’s the analysis you’ll likely not find elsewhere and it’s simple: 1-as threading through the Bidens and Ukraine, the COVID-19 narrative has unraveled entirely and it’s a monumentally problematic issue for the U.S. politburo and the federal apparatus and 2-the closer we get to the unvarnished truth about COVID-19, massive money laundering operations in Ukraine that have benefited the U.S. politburo, China, Ukraine, Trump, Twitter and the balance of that long list of crimes against humanity, THE CLOSER WE GET TO WAR.
War is the one thing with the capacity to erase any and all concerns and evidence preceding it. If all of the evidence of corruption, crime and treason is clearly presented on the chalkboard for all to see, war is your classroom teacher grabbing the eraser and making it all disappear right as the fire alarm sounds to send everyone outside in a panic.
This illegitimate administration is desperate to maintain control as it all crumbles around them and it places us in highly dangerous times. Make no mistake about it. If it is required, they will absolutely pull the fire alarm of war.
The election was too big to rig, the IC lost control and now the unavoidable circumstance of Donald Trump is returning to the Executive determined to unravel it all.
This is precisely why Matt Gaetz could never become Attorney General as I indicated this morning in this illustration posted at Xwitter:
[Click on the Xwitter link to view that thread which includes two additional FTX/Sam Bankman-Fried illustrations that enmesh Ukraine as the constructed portal to WWIII.]
Tomorrow’s emergency talks between NATO and Ukraine will determine whether we move off the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war, the direction we go or whether stay straddling it, but that’s only if new developments do not further derail the status quo in the direction of the unthinkable.
Stay tuned for further analysis currently being posted daily in the late morning or later.
-End-
"or chemical weapons" as Biden stated? I do remember this play being at the centre of the proposed escalation in the Syria conflict and hence we had the very controversial "red line rat line" article from Mr Hersh.
Always the crown red dragon emblem Prince of Wales