AG Merrick Garland Issues Statement on Important SCOTUS Gun Rights Ruling

ANALYSIS & PROJECTION: US Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a formal statement on an important run rights ruling from the US Supreme Court in United States v. Rahimi. Where does this go?

On Friday morning, the US Department of Justice through Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a formal statement on an important run rights ruling from the US Supreme Court in United States v. Rahimi.

Garland’s full statement is as follows:

“The Supreme Court’s decision today in United States v. Rahimi upholds Congress’s longstanding prohibition on the possession of firearms by people subject to domestic-violence restraining orders. That law protects victims by keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals who pose a threat to their intimate partners and children.

As the Justice Department argued, and as the Court reaffirmed today, that commonsense prohibition is entirely consistent with the Court’s precedent and the text and history of the Second Amendment.

The Justice Department will continue to enforce this important statute, which for nearly 30 years has helped to protect victims and survivors of domestic violence from their abusers. And we will continue to deploy all available resources to support law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, and victim advocates to address the pervasive problem of domestic violence.”

DOJ/AG Merrick Garland

The timing of this in a pivotal election year that is already controversial is highly problematic for reasons that are already and extensively laid-out in the analysis contained in the series The Hunt Is On.

That series evidences the position that Garland’s DOJ is engaged in operational lawfare targeting the Biden regime’s political opposition and in the overarching scheme, it’s predicated on entrapment [Mar-a-Lago, Capitol “insurrection,” etc.] where the subsequent DOJ prosecutions of those constructed crimes also serve the purposes of deterrence and stifling dissent.

That’s what Marxists do.

The operational lawfare is attributable to the Intelligence Community and the legal architecture is already in place.

That architecture continues to be developed by the IC, DOJ, SCOTUS [wittingly or not], Congress et al; and where the latter three are subject to influence and control by the former.

The legal architecture has pillars of “extremism,” “domestic terrorists/terrorism,” “violence” and the Second Amendment.

For that reason, the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. Rahimi potentially serves the legal architecture and the operational objectives it serves.

In United States v. Rahimi, SCOTUS has established legal precedent where the Second Amendment can be interceded on, restricted or violated for individuals who the DOJ itself has labeled as “dangerous individuals who pose a threat.”

Occam’s prevails to inform us that the the context matters not and the bridge [legal architecture] between domestic violence and violence that threatens “national security,” “democracy” and the “Constitution” is a very wide and short one that only goes in one direction: directly to Marxist communism.

DOJ’s constructed bridge will move on identified individuals for the purpose of interceding on their protected Second Amendment rights by citing the precedent created in United States v. Rahimi.

Occam’s also prevails to project forward: If the current Dynastic Bush power base that exists behind the Intelligence Community, its proxy the Biden Administration and its other proxies in the broader federal apparatus; and the Globalist cabal behind Dynastic Bush, manages to maintain their stranglehold on power, which they will after stealing the 2024 election as they did in 2020, the ongoing operational lawfare will extend to removing firearms from “insurrectionists,” “domestic terrorists” and “right wing extremists.”

Of course, prosecutorial discretion bears down with full might in two-tiered fashion where it’s the DOJ and its agencies which retain the power and authority to label any American with “insurrectionist,” “domestic terrorist” or “right wing extremists” and as it always does, the Intelligence Community will make criminals out of thin air just as it did in the Capitol “insurrection” entrapment operation.

That’s what Marxists do and it’s textbook relative to the ongoing conversion of the US to Marxism where history is replete with examples of communists confiscating firearms as a critical precursory component to galvanizing power on the back-end of overthrow.

As always, it will be immeasurably important to continue monitoring SCOTUS, DOJ, Congress and the Executive [via executive order] in all ways related to the Second Amendment.

-End-