Big Picture Comes Full Circle: NATO Membership for Ukraine

ANALYSIS: On an expedited timeline within a 2-week period of intense escalations, Zelensky goes full circle on Ukraine’s NATO membership as a war trigger.

The past two weeks have represented an intense escalation in the incremental march to a thermonuclear world war. In the aggregate analysis, we have examined the ‘war v. threat of war’ dynamic as a driver of policy, diplomacy and profit making on several occasions including these: War or Threat of War? Either Way It’s a Massive Money and Weapons Laundering Operation and “Big Boy” Biden Rekindles War or Threat of War Position. Within that examination is the longstanding and reciprocal position in the analysis relative to Ukraine’s highly sought after membership in NATO as a mechanism to further encroach on Russia’s national security and sovereignty. In effect, Ukraine is already a de facto NATO member with over 40 installations throughout Ukraine that include US Department of Defense biolabs. These reasons and more account for Putin’s initial “special security operation” in Ukraine beginning in February 2022 and where it has since escalated to the present situation. Therein, President Trump had maintained normalized diplomatic relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin during his first term and Joe Biden turned the tables on Russia before he was even inaugurated: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War. All of this is underpinned by history drawing back to late-1991 and the break-up of the USSR into Russia and its former satellite states that were made sovereign. By treaty, Ukraine then denuclearized in 1994 agreeing to forfeit its nuclear arsenal in exchange for guaranteed security. Guaranteed security is a function of NATO and here we are full circle to the genesis of it all: NATO’s generational encroachment on Russia’s national security and sovereignty. A primary component to NATO’s Russian encroachment is the drive for Ukraine’s NATO membership. Overlaying that history is this new development: Zelenskyy Offers To End ‘Hot Phase’ Of War In Exchange For NATO Membership.

---

This is the 234th article in the series WAR, FAMINE & DISEASE.

---

NEW DEVELOPMENTS

Reporting from Sky News via Zero Hedge indicates that:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he’s willing to end the “hot phase of the war” with Russia – including ceding captured territory – in exchange for NATO membership that includes Ukraine’s internationally recognized borders.

“If we want to stop the hot phase of the war, we need to take under the Nato umbrella the territory of Ukraine that we have under our control,” he told Sky News, adding “We need to do it fast. And then, on the occupied territory of Ukraine, Ukraine can get them back in a diplomatic way.“

Zelenskyy said that a ceasefire was needed to “guarantee that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin will not come back” to take more Ukrainian territory,” or that “he [Putin] will come back.”

In short, to end the war, Zelenskyy wants the thing that started the war.

[…]

Putting things in recent perspective, Zelenskyy’s comments come as NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte admitted to Fox News that Ukraine is not in a strong enough position to negotiate an end to the war, explaining that there is not enough battlefield leverage to “prevent the Russians from getting what they want.”

Johnson also asserted that if Russia gets the upper hand in the conflict then Britain may deploy it’s forces regardless in order to “defend Europe.” Ukraine’s eastern defenses are currently being overrun by ongoing Russian attrition tactics. This reality in combination with Trump’s avalanche election win seems to have triggered establishment ghouls into a frenzy of escalation with Joe Biden giving the greenlight on long range missile strikes coordinated directly by NATO forces.

The remarks above align tightly with longstanding analysis on Ukraine’s NATO membership as a critical component to the full scale regional war on the verge of becoming a global one.

Specifically, consider the “establishment ghouls” being “triggered” into a “frenzy of escalation” relative to this 2-week period and the longstanding projected kinetic flashpoint for World War III: 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months.

Then, ask yourself if we have alignment.

We do and it’s precise.

THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC UKRAINE REVIEWED

The strategic importance of Ukraine is framed by two primary components: energy and security.

The analysis laid this out years ago: UNDERSTANDING THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF UKRAINE: Going Deep on Ukraine’s Strategic Importance Reveals That We’re Repeating the History Obama, the Clintons and the Bidens Engineered for Us: “Again, UKRAINE is the KEYSTONE via ENERGY and SECURITY – Biden said it himself. Moreover, how does this position Ukraine – directly in the middle of two sides: Russia>Ukraine<West/US as it relates to both ENERGY and SECURITY. That’s important.”

Energy and security therefore become the two primary interfaces for the US government and its personnel, like Joe Biden, to engage with Ukraine and this normally entails private equity compensation and kickbacks from relative funding sent to NGOs, laundered and returned to the sender – personnel for the US government, et al.

That’s what SBF/FTX was [FTX examined in The Keystone of Corruption series]:

DOJ’s prosecution of Sam Bankman-Fried was the operational cover and control over that construct: PROJECTION CONFIRMED: Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Gets Sweetheart Deal from Corrupt Judge Exactly as Projected at Time of SBF Arrest.

The importance of Ukraine is explained in this March 2022 piece, which also touches on aspects of Ukraine’s desired NATO membership: UNDERSTANDING THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF UKRAINE: Going Deep on Ukraine’s Strategic Importance Reveals That We’re Repeating the History Obama, the Clintons and the Bidens Engineered for Us.

In May 2024, this further piece lined-out Ukraine/NATO implications that were being framed by the Biden Administration as a mechanism to trigger war: WORLD WAR III: Blinken’s Bridge to Confirmed NATO Membership for Ukraine Forges Path to War:

THE TAKEAWAY from that Moonshine extract is the concept of creating a geopolitical “switch” to trigger a multiple-front war in three specific theaters in the sequence laid-out: Russia/Ukraine, China/Taiwan/South China Sea and the Middle East/Syria/Iran.

To kick a dead horse and in case it isn’t patently obvious, the analysis holds that Biden’s designed NATO encroachment on Russia provides a literal “switch” to trigger war and that “switch” is Ukraine’s NATO membership.

Ukraine’s NATO membership was central to the annual NATO summit as examined in July 2023: Men in Tiny Suits Ignore Tiny Man With No Suit at All, U-Turn in Ukraine Still Has Us on the Road to World War III:

The multifaceted utilitarian value in the Ukraine construct includes making the country the hub of global money laundering operations [and other sordid criminality] and the tip of the spear for NATO’s continued decades-long encirclement of Russia.

NATO membership for Finland, Sweden and, of course, Ukraine, is central to this position.

The Sam Bankman-Fried FTX scandal is part and parcel to these operations just like the Biden family’s entanglements with Burisma.

Recall that energy is the “currency of corruption” serving as the conduit to globally move laundered money and Ukraine is all about energy.

So is Joe Biden.

Therefore, when we see the “wee little point man” of this Ukrainian operation of enterprise fraud and war pushed aside because he’s not tall enough to ride the ride, it stands to impact much more than a manufactured war.

In July 2023, the analysis put it like this: WAR DRUMS INTENSIFY: NATO Membership, Cluster Bombs and Biden White House Blow:

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-TX is a clear NATO/MIC/intelligence community asset otherwise the 10-term Congressman would not have chaired the House Committee on Homeland Security nor would he be positioned to currently chair the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

McCaul was clearly dispatched to push cluster bombs but it’s his remarks on Ukraine’s NATO membership that are most problematic.

When viewing McCaul’s statement that admitting Ukraine as a NATO member “would immediately put us at war with Russia” against the backdrop of Biden’s statement that Ukraine is not ready to become a NATO member, we see the creation of a geopolitical “switch.”

The “switch” becomes one that Biden can flip at a moment of his choosing [or more accurately, the people behind Biden] to further escalate the Russian front in the pending multiple-front war with Russia and China.

According to McCaul, all Biden has to do is give his blessing for NATO’s membership and at that moment, the “switch” is flipped to give the establishment the war they so badly desire and need.

It should be noted that Ukraine’s NATO membership is a longstanding marker event in my multiple-front war analysis and this makes the combined McCaul/Biden remarks and the resulting “switch” as potentially deadly as they are problematic.

As soon as the Ukraine/Russia front goes kinetic, the analysis holds that Beijing will immediately move on Taiwan to open the second front with China.

Take Joe Biden’s “war switch” and overlay it with this as laid-out in December 2022: War At All Costs:

Here’s the analysis you’ll likely not find elsewhere and it’s simple: 1-as threading through the Bidens and Ukraine, the COVID-19 narrative has unraveled entirely and it’s a monumentally problematic issue for the U.S. politburo and the federal apparatus and 2-the closer we get to the unvarnished truth about COVID-19, massive money laundering operations in Ukraine that have benefited the U.S. politburo, China, Ukraine, Trump, Twitter and the balance of that long list of crimes against humanity, THE CLOSER WE GET TO WAR.

War is the one thing with the capacity to erase any and all concerns and evidence preceding it. If all of the evidence of corruption, crime and treason is clearly presented on the chalkboard for all to see, war is your classroom teacher grabbing the eraser and making it all disappear right as the fire alarm sounds to send everyone outside in a panic.

This illegitimate administration is desperate to maintain control as it all crumbles around them and it places us in highly dangerous times. Make no mistake about it. If it is required, they will absolutely pull the fire alarm of war.

Ukraine’s NATO membership is an incendiary plausibility with a substantial history underpinning it as a mechanism to global war.

THE CONVENTIONAL ANALOG

The conventional analog often discussed in the analysis is The Cuban Missile Crisis as reviewed in May 2024: WORLD WAR III: Blinken’s Bridge to Confirmed NATO Membership for Ukraine Forges Path to War:

Understand that this is the equivalent of an inverted Cuban missile crisis exponentially more problematic and dangerous.

In this case; however, the position of Putin and Russia is painted as villainous and warmongering rather than appropriate, like in 1962 and into 1963 when the US responded to Russian encroachment and then the Intelligence Community eliminated the impediment of President John F. Kennedy.

The result was the ‘Dynastic Bush’ political continuum.

Although the Cuban Missile Crisis is an excellent lens to see the conflict through Putin’s eyes, it pales in comparison to the scope and lethality of that with which NATO is surrounding Russia including directly on its borders.

At least Kennedy enjoyed a 1,519-mile margin over a body of water.

From George H.W. Bush to present and excluding only one U.S. President – Donald J. Trump – every US president has been a functionary of the Dynastic Bush political continuum, which has constructed critical events throughout history in order to accomplish geopolitical objectives that feature Globalism, one world governance, Marxism and war.

That brings us full circle again.

A BROADER PERSPECTIVE ON NATO

A broader perspective on NATO’s encroachment on Russia’s national security and sovereignty is required to fully understand why Putin’s escalating response is warranted and justified.

That perspective is a geographical one where other nations contiguous or not become problematic by their NATO membership in proximity to Russia, like Finland, Sweden, Poland, Turkey, etc.; it’s a substantial list as indicated by the map below.

Source: NATO

Source: NATO

Once the entire Russia/Ukraine conflict is distilled down to its purest form by the fire of truth, it logically deduces to this: Russia is fighting a US proxy in Ukraine to keep NATO out and the US is fighting Russia through its proxy to get NATO in.

Relative to the war that began in earnest in February 2022, Ukraine’s NATO membership has been a generational operation comparatively speaking and respective to the break-up of the USSR in 1991 and Ukraine’s subsequent agreement in 1994 to forego its nuclear arsenal.

A HEGELIAN DIALECTIC CONSTRUCT

Although the longer timeline extends as far back as 1991, when the Godfather of Dynastic Bush George H.W. Bush was President, the Ukraine war proxy construct began in earnest in late December 2020: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War.

When viewed through the appropriate lens, the architecture of the Ukraine war can be defined as an Hegelian dialectic construct: Guest Submission: The Hegelian Dialectics of our Crime Wave:

• Thesis/Problem: “Russia bad” narrative.

• Antithesis/Reaction: NATO escalations in response to “bad Russia” and Putin’s counterstrikes to those escalations.

• Synthesis/Solution: Wage war to defeat “bad Russia.”

The construct requires a controllable “switch” or “pull” as a war-triggering mechanism.

THE WAR SWITCH

Waging war requires a “switch” or “pull” and there are normally several options, but where the most significant of those in the Russia/Ukraine conflict is Ukraine’s NATO membership.

Another consideration for a war switch is the nuclear [or chemical] entrapment operation that Biden began to lay down in September 2022 as reviewed in this: NATO and Ukraine Emergency Talks Result in Default to Previous Stance, Escalations Ease for Now, Russian Counterstrike Still Looms.

That operation leverages war reciprocity to bait Putin into a response or alternatively entails carrying-out a false-flag operation that assigns attribution to Putin in order to elicit a response that crosses a previously drawn chemical or nuclear red line.

That response would predicate what NATO has always coveted – firing its ICBMs directly at Russia while avoiding the messiness of a proxy war nation altogether.

The primary war switch; however, has always been Ukraine’s NATO membership making this development a critical one.

The reporting on Zelensky said it best in describing what the analysis has been laying-out beginning in late December 2020 over a year in advance of Putin’s initial February 2022 strike: “to end the war, Zelenskyy wants the thing that started the war.”

Now ask yourself if that’s an accident and if it’s not, then discussion of prosecuting for war crimes under the War Crimes Act of 1996 should be an immediate priority for the Trump Administration beginning 20 Jan 25.

FINAL REMARKS

Occam’s prevails to inform the ‘war v. threat of war’ component to the Ukraine war construct.

If, escalations continue in whatever form to trigger global war, we can infer that global war has been the operational objective.

If global war is avoided, we can infer that threat of war for the purpose of driving policy, diplomacy and profit making has been the operational objective.

In the case of the latter, we have the explanation for immediately discussing the prosecution of war crimes under a Trump DOJ.

To facilitate any such prosecutions, Mr. Trump should immediately declassify everything on 9/11 to bring us back full circle one more time in identifying those who carried it out: Dynastic Bush.

Stay tuned for analysis being published in the late morning on a 24-hour cycle during this 2-week period of significant escalations.

-End of New Content-

CONTEXTUAL BACKDROP

Chronology

The war escalation chronology that began in late December 2020 [From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War] intensified beginning 17 Nov 24 and it entails:

1. 17 Nov 24: Joe Biden’s Sunday authorization for long-range missiles against Russia: Trump Details Plan to “Dismantle the Deep State,” Deep State Counters by Crossing Putin’s Line on Long Range Missiles.

2. 19 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Tuesday leveraging of Biden’s authorization to strike Russia with US long-range missiles: US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat.

3. 20 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Wednesday firing of 12 UK [NATO] Storm Shadow missiles at Russia targeting the Kursk region in Southern Russia: 12 UK Storm Shadow Missiles Were Fired Into Russia, Local Sources Say.

4. 21 Nov 24: Russia’s retaliatory ICBM strike against Ukrainian [NATO?] military targets: Russia Fires ICBM Into Ukraine For First Time, Kiev Claims.

5. 21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday attack on Ukraine using hypersonic missiles with MIRV technology: REPORT ACCELERATES ALREADY EXPEDITED WWIII TRAJECTORY: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.

6. 21 Nov 24: Russia’s Thursday advisement that a US/NATO missile base in Poland [NATO ally] that became operational this month [reported last Saturday] has been classified as a potential priority strike target: Putin Validates War Analysis: The world stands on the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war.

7. 22 Nov 24: Ukraine’s Friday cancellation of regular parliament session to set emergency talks with NATO [from Breitbart]: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack.

8. 24 Nov 24: Ukraine’s overnight Sunday strikes deep inside of Russia with ATACMS long-range missile systems provided by the United States: REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia.

9. 26 Nov 24: Ukraine and NATO hold emergency talks with an outcome defaulting to perpetual war and trending towards a chemical/nuclear entrapment scenario: All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike and NATO and Ukraine Emergency Talks Result in Default to Previous Stance, Escalations Ease for Now, Russian Counterstrike Still Looms.

10. 27 Nov 24: Putin addressed the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Summit in Astana to lay-out plausible Kiev-based targets for Russia’s looming counterstrike: Decision-making centers in Kiev could be targeted in Oreshnik strikes — Putin.

11. 28 Nov 24: Russia carries-out counterstrike in Ukraine in response to ATACMS strikes deep inside Russia deploying 100 drones and firing 90 missiles targeting Ukrainian power infrastructure and causing widespread blackouts affecting 1 million people: Putin Threatens Ukrainian Capital With New Hypersonic Missile.

12. 29 Nov 24: Zelensky goes full circle on an expedited timeline to reposition Ukraine’s NATO membership as a trigger for global war: Zelenskyy Offers To End ‘Hot Phase’ Of War In Exchange For NATO Membership.

Established Cycle

As indicated in the analysis and with war reciprocity bearing down, the established cycle is roughly 24 hours.

With a 24-hour turnover in the cycle and during this period of marked intensification, the analysis here is being published daily in the late morning or after.

Analysis

Here is the analysis for the 2-week escalation period:

1. Trump Details Plan to “Dismantle the Deep State,” Deep State Counters by Crossing Putin’s Line on Long Range Missiles

2. US Long-range Missiles Strike Inside Russia: US Proxy Zelensky Uses Biden’s Authorization to Follow-through on Threat

3. More Asymmetrical, Irregular and Undeclared Warfare from China: Chinese Ship Sabotages Baltic Sea Cables

4. Manufactured Insanity of World War III Escalates, ICBMs for 1st Time Ever, Where Does This End?

5. Putin Validates War Analysis: The world stands on the transition line between full scale regional war and full scale global war

6. REPORT ACCELERATES ALREADY EXPEDITED WWIII TRAJECTORY: NATO and Ukraine to Hold Emergency Talks After Russian Hypersonic Missile Attack

7. WORLD WAR III: US Officials Discuss Nuclear Armament for Ukraine as Russian Deterrence Strategy

8. REPORT: Ukraine Carried-Out Overnight Strikes with US ATACMS Long-Range Missile Deep Inside Russia

9. All Eyes on NATO/Ukraine Emergency Talks as Russia Prepares for Counterattack to US ATACMS Strike

10. NATO and Ukraine Emergency Talks Result in Default to Previous Stance, Escalations Ease for Now, Russian Counterstrike Still Looms

11. Putin Identifies Likely Targets of Looming Counterstrike, Calls Ukrainian Government Illegitimate Under Zelensky

12. Putin Details “Comprehensive” Counterstrike, Barrage of Drones and Missiles Targeted Ukrainian Energy Infrastructure

Full Analysis

To view the aggregate analysis chronologically, see the War, Famine & Disease series.

5-Stage Linear War Trajectory

The analysis laid-out 5 plausible outcomes and where time is taken time to identify ones already eclipsed: 1-threat of war, 2-limited scale regional war, 3-full scale regional war, 4-limited scale global war and 5-full scale global war.

The outcomes posed represent a LINEAR TRAJECTORY from the THREAT OF WAR to FULL SCALE GLOBAL WAR.

The analysis indicates our current placement on the linear trajectory of 5 outcomes: CURRENT PLACEMENT: Resting on the transition line between a full scale regional war and a limited or full scale global war.

-End-