From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War
ANALYSIS: From a 2020 foreign policy shift to World War III in 2024, the Biden Administration has incrementally marched us to a designed war that Joe Biden was paid by China to lose.
The time period between the stolen November 2020 election and the fraudulent inauguration of Joe Biden as President of the United States is one of the most dystopian moments ever captured and analyzed in history; but not by enough people with bullhorns big enough to matter. In a recent article, I reviewed the topic again reproducing it here for our introduction to this piece:
In December 2020, the analysis identified a critical data point when the incoming Biden Administration made a significant foreign policy change to move away from the outgoing Trump Administration’s appropriate hyper-focus on China as our primary military, economic and political adversary and back to the Intelligence Community’s favorite NATO “boogeyman” Russia. That data point was captured and used to formulate an entire catalog of hundreds of items of further war analysis that clearly evidences a demonstrable and incremental march towards a thermonuclear World War III in three primary theaters: Ukraine [Russia], Taiwan/South China Sea [China] and the Middle East [Syria/Iran/Iraq, et al.]. The dog whistle at the front of that march is a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden.
Political Moonshine
For a very long time, I maintained on the website a countdown to inauguration day tabbing it one of the most important days in US history.
The foreign policy change issued by the incoming Biden Administration in advance of that inauguration would be the single moment in time that America would be placed on a designed trajectory for a planned World War III and even worse, in March 2022, I explained how the designed war will result in a designed loss – Biden is going to take a dive: ALARMING: WHITE HOUSE’S ABRUPT REVERSAL OF POSITIONS – Every American Should Read and Come to Understand the White House’s Disingenuous and Newly Fabricated Position on the Multiple-Front War Precisely Predicted Long Ago.
Who or what would lead any post-war treaty process to formalize the handover to the Intelligence Community, Globalists and communist China?
It will be the same United Nations that led-out on the fraudulent “pandemic,” which delivered Joe Biden as a Chinese proxy 13-minutes early on Inauguration Day in January 2021.
The original analysis included these remarks:
There is an ongoing pivot back to Russia and it’s pending on the finality of the Biden steal. As 80 million Americans find themselves imprisoned by draconian measures delivered by the CCP’s weaponized pandemic, they are also trying to sort-out the granular aspects of a patently stolen election. Meanwhile, there is a fundamental shift that is occurring and is likely going unnoticed. The implications of it all are profound. […]
The Deep State leviathan sold us all out to China and the CCP for their partnership in assuming full and final control of this once proud constitutional republic. They drove that effort with a false Russia narrative devised to deflect everything away from China and it’s purchase of an illegitimately installed puppet in Joe Biden. Nancy Pelosi calibrated her irregular impeachment of President Trump to veil COVID-19 as it was ushered-in and saddled between Christmas and New Years. It then was leveraged to steal the election. We were placed on a war footing with China long ago and at the latest when they released a bio-WMD against this nation back in October.
Now, pending the finality of the Biden win, that war footing is being pivoted back to Russia and it sounds like Congress cares to leverage it further in suppressing the great awakening while further driving the great reset. The pivot back to Russia is here and it’s not going anywhere.
It’s all on the line America. Time to stand-up and fight like Americans.
Political Moonshine on 19 Dec 20
Hardly anyone stood-up, fewer fought and people mostly accepted whatever they were told while imprisoning themselves at home, donning their masks that have never and will never work and volunteering to inject themselves with an experimental mRNA genetic therapy failing to qualify as a vaccine by any definition for vaccine until they changed that definition; and where the ingredients of those mRNA injections were redacted in clear violation of informed consent.
That’s a harsh but deadly accurate description of evidence-based truth and the evidence is painfully obvious: the uptake rate on the initial round of mRNA injections was 80%, which only leads to one plausible explanation that is also harsh but again deadly accurate.
*Link
As shown throughout the aggregate analysis, I believe that historians will look back upon this time to identify a pervasive inability to think independently and critically as the underlying cause of death for this nation.
As it will be; however, to the victor go the spoils of war and so that history will be fraudulently written in adherence to the establishment narrative.
Blind and dumb slaves make the best slaves of all.
There’s a subtle distinction and a fine line between being so-called “anti-vax” and being anti-anti-Nuremberg Code.
The 80% of the US population that failed the experimental mRNA common sense test failed to discern that distinction and depending on batch and lot numbers, brand of mRNA injection, the number of doses and boosters and other factors, a substantially heavy price is being paid for that failure.
Resting in between the initial 19 Dec 20 analysis and the present time are over 180 arduously prepared articles analyzing a clearly constructed World War III scenario on three specific fronts: Russia/Ukraine, China/Taiwan/South China Sea and the Middle East/Syria/Iran/Iraq.
The exclusive analysis is heavily cited and sourced to draw-down on World War III positions that hardly anyone else identified or expanded upon in the same ways.
That analysis also includes a full slate of accurate projections where based upon cogent logical deductions, positions are extrapolated forward to project future events with remarkable accuracy: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: World War III Projections, Confirmations and Developments.
ACCURATE PROJECTIONS IN SPADES
Accurate analysis permits immediate projections that prove accurate in the end; often years down the road. Special Counsel John Durham and former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried are but two excellent examples of many.
It’s important to pause to identify an historically critical marker that also accounts for another accurate projection that no one else appeared to identify or make at that time.
Intense examination of Chinese hegemonic and military doctrine was one launch point in the aggregate war analysis.
Therein, it’s acknowledged that historically, China and Russia have been geopolitical and hegemonic rivals.
In March 2021 and building off the foreign policy shift analysis from mid-December 2020, I projected that history and precedent would be pushed aside in a scenario that would see China and Russia align diplomatically, economically and militarily.
What then happened incrementally over time as laid out in the analysis?
China and Russia came to enjoy bilateral relations diplomatically, economically and militarily; just as projected.
To this we add the analytical bookend of the 05 Nov 24 “election” with a +/- 3-month window applied in consideration to the Reagan/Hinkley timeline and other relevant considerations.
That all brings us to new developments sourced from Semafor: US, China talks illustrate hardening divide.
Whereas the Trump Administration had normalized diplomatic relations with Putin and Russia; and brought China to heel on a very short leash, the late-December 2020 foreign policy shift by the incoming Biden Administration reversed course to the present and a “hardening divide” specifically occurring in the identified theaters of war and for the projected reasons in the analysis.
Officials in the U.S. and China will host separate meetings this week with key allies as the gulf between the two countries grows. U.S. President Joe Biden will host the leaders of the Philippines and Japan for talks this week, with the three nations carrying out maritime drills alongside Australia in the South China Sea on Sunday in the face of rising tensions with Beijing.
[…]
US believes China is propping up Russia: Despite Beijing’s assertions that China is neutral in the Russia-Ukraine war, Washington is warning allies that Beijing is providing Moscow geospatial intelligence, a type of surveillance that tracks human activity through satellite imagery. Bloomberg reported that trade between Russia and China has boomed in recent years, reaching $240 billion in 2023, a record. China has provided a crucial lifeline to Russia since Moscow invaded in 2022, offering access to clothes, vehicles, and machinery in the wake of widespread Western sanctions. Chinese support for Russia has expanded, sources that spoke to Bloomberg said, and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently called for Western allies to do more to curtail the partnership.
Biden is expected to warn Beijing over escalation in South China Sea: U.S. officials believe that China has underestimated the likelihood of escalation in the South China Sea, and Biden is expected to raise concerns over the Chinese military’s activity towards the Philippine Navy in the area, sources that spoke to the Financial Times said. The U.S. has stopped short of issuing a “red line” about Beijing’s operations, the officials added: “If you give the Chinese a red line, they will go just short of that and do everything but,” one person that spoke to the newspaper said. Meanwhile, Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the German Marshall Fund, told the FT that if China directly attacked the Philippines “Washington would be compelled to respond,” meaning a “major political crisis between the U.S. and China would ensue, and, at worst, a wider military conflict.”
China and Russia likely see an opportunity to challenge US hegemony: China and Russia already control swaths of Eurasia between them, and their “no-limits” partnership has offered a level of resistance against the U.S. and its allies, historian and former Canadian politician Michael Ignatieff wrote for El País. The partnership threatens stability globally, he argued, and would test the limits of Washington’s defenses: “If they decided to mount an overt challenge to the American order — for example, with a coordinated, simultaneous offensive against Ukraine and Taiwan,” then “the U.S. would struggle to rush weapons and technology into the breach,” he wrote.
Semafor
The aggregate analysis and accompanying projections at Moonshine remain on straight rails with great accuracy to once again demonstrate the difference between “news” and analysis; and why the latter is much more valuable.
As the 2024 “election” draws closer to its scheduled date of 05 Nov 24, there will be increasing intensity in the irregular and asymmetrical warfare that is the pre-kinetic softening phase of warfare we are currently experiencing.
Things every American should deeply contemplate include:
Will the elections occur or will war, another biowarfare attack, a series of terrorism events or a combination of these things act to intercede on and indefinitely postpone the election as the nation takes its remaining few steps into Marxist communism and forever?
Will we decide to think independently and critically to the extent we have the intestinal fortitude to rise-up before they steal the election or after they steal it?
Do we remember what happened the last time we pitifully and inadequately tried to rise-up in protest to a stolen election [they entrapped those people and locked them in an Amerikan gulag for deterrence by making examples out of them in!]?
Will it be before they commence World War III or after?
Before they topple more skyscrapers and unleash more bioweapons or after?
Most importantly – what happened the last time 80% of us doubled-down on the worst odds ever to bet against a house that is holding all of the cards and all of the chips [look back up at the better than 99% survival rate for most demographics]?
Why didn’t China mandate that bioweapon for its own soldiers?
What might #7 look like after the US military is engaged in a kinetic World War III divided over the three fronts identified?
How did that work out for the Germans in WWII when they were split into two fonts on 06 Jun 44?
What are the odds that around 80% of the US population also failed to learn accurate history aggravated by an inability to extrapolate it forward to ascertain the truth about current and future events?
What are the chances that we get out of all of this alive if we don’t first begin to think independently and critically [they aren’t very good]?
How does this all play-out after they’ve crashed the entire system and robbed everyone of everything; everything now possessed by them, unaffordable to all and meted-out like welfare benefits [read this: What’s So Great About The Great Reset, Great Taking, Great Replacement, Great Deflation, & Next Great Depression?]?
From a 2020 foreign policy shift to World War III in 2024, the Biden Administration has incrementally marched us to a designed war that Joe Biden was paid by China to lose.
We have a reckoning coming and it’s scheduled to arrive 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months.
Between now and then, we have a lot to contemplate; a lot of questions to ask; and a lot of answers to reconcile.
Anything short of the American people preempting the stolen 2024 election to ensure their will is represented in a legitimate vote will be the final nail in the coffin.
If we don’t, the rest is a foregone conclusion that will play out according to Intelligence Community plans and contingency plans.
-End-
Shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, I heard an interview with a woman who had recently retired from one of the defense/intelligence agencies (unfortunately I was driving on a long trip and can’t remember her name or the agency).
Normally I would have taken an interview like that with a grain of salt, but the thing that struck me was the seriousness and fear that she projected…..
she was warning the audience that she was part of a high level group who was war gaming/computer modeling the various possible scenarios between the US/NATO and Russia after the invasion and that every single one of the computer models/war games ended in nuclear war.
She sounded very serious and more than a little scared…..
https://youtu.be/bRuIZgDkG2U?si=qJdxvj_uGtPbPKQ-
Di Dongsheng