87 Comments
User's avatar
ALtab's avatar

Actually what Biden did was initiate a blazing spotlight on the corruption each of these people committed. Light over darkness.

Expand full comment
Ahmed’s Stack of Subs's avatar

if only one person can be punished it has to be milley. if he skates then the military becomes a political tool. welcome to the roman empire and a new praetorian guard. milley needs to face the ultimate limit of the law/ucmj. he (and all retired officers) is still subject to recall and punishment under ucmj.

Expand full comment
James Bryson's avatar

The illegitimate Regime is DONE, fruit of the poisonous tree, UniParty enabled, STOLEN ELECTION, FEDSURRECTION (smoke screen) has only begun to pay for their crimes.

Justice is coming.

Expand full comment
Lerville's avatar

Yes! Joe’s fake pardons should be rescinded BECAUSE, joe was NOT IF SOUND MIND AND BODY! If he can’t stand in front of a jury because he’s a feeble old man, then his pardons are PHONY!!

Expand full comment
EricStoner's avatar

Thanks for the laugh,

“Hunter was the drug-addicted Biden Crime Family bag man with a sexual appetite of the same magnitude; both of which made him easier for China to flip than a mattress worn-out by Eric Swalwell and Fang Fang.”

Good article.

Expand full comment
Geo Bar's avatar

What about Biden’s diminished mental state? He couldn’t be prosecuted for breaking laws with possession of classified documents

Who was actually running the country when Biden was incapable. Results of that investigation alone could nullify EVERY

Expand full comment
Awaken The Lions In Truth's avatar

Touche!

...Brilliant exposition of Bidens faux pas PreEmptive pardons using the Rico statute and the Throckmorton Doctrine!

HUZZAH!

Expand full comment
Daniel Meegan's avatar

Praise The Lord Begin🙏🙏🙏 prosecutions expeditiously let Freedom Rein

Expand full comment
Rikki Kerner's avatar

Absolutely phenomenal article !

Expand full comment
William De Freitas's avatar

Every one of the pricks pictured above need to be in prison

Expand full comment
Ernie Rockwell's avatar

What I don't get is how can you preemptively pardon someone? Can't that only be done once they are convicted, or at least charged?

Expand full comment
Sub Presser's avatar

It is certainly now one of the most-abused policies in presidential politics, and those who abuse it must be investigated and prosecuted for their attempt to cover crimes.

Expand full comment
Ernie Rockwell's avatar

That it could be abused can't really be avoided, if we are to allow a government official the right to grant clemency. However, the scope of the power can be restricted, and should be IMO, and limited to those charged/convicted.

Expand full comment
Sub Presser's avatar

Thank you for this excellent article. Truly, pre-emptive pardons must be declared unconstitutional. The sooner, the better. Already, both Obama and Biden have done immeasurable harm to the nation and the rule of law.

Expand full comment
misterkel's avatar

I like your analyses, but you kind of ignore a really critical possibility:

Trump is a Deep State Operative.

Maybe that's wrong, but it's weak analysis to ignore it.

It needs refutation for your credibility.

I believe it more and more.

Expand full comment
Jp's avatar

🙄🙄Prove your allegation; why should the author have to refute your ridiculous claim?

Expand full comment
misterkel's avatar

To clarify: PM"s overriding hypothesis is that the IC is in almost complete control of the political apparatus. This idea: Trump is now taking a second turn in the White House and is in now way compromised by the IC. He's a genuine outsider. The election was too big to rig. He was unassassinatable. He beat every lawfare campaign.

That idea is suss. The null hypothesis should be that he is compromised and the IC has set up all these things as theater. He is now their agent, posing as some sort of savior of the people. This legitimizes him in the eyes of the 'resistance' or whatever you want to call people who disbelieve the 'Narrative.'

Considering the subtle maneuverings of the IC (according to PM here) this level of play would be well within their realm.

How is the hypothesis ridiculous? It sounds like SOP for the IC.

Expand full comment
misterkel's avatar

They don't have to do anything. And it's not a claim. A claim is something asserted with strong belief. I said it's a possibility. It's a potential hypothesis that is being ignored in an otherwise compelling analysis.

As I said, perhaps it is false. That clearly indicates I am

NOT MAKING A CLAIM!

I am putting forth a hypothesis for logical analysis. Without this hypothesis, which, by the way, is hardly ridiculous, PM's analysis is incomplete.

Expand full comment
Paul Black's avatar

He is. Zionist Lucifarian.

Expand full comment
Bryan L.'s avatar

We need accountability for what the Democrats tried to overthrow a sitting president. I believe that is called treason. Let the arrest begin.

Expand full comment
David fuller's avatar

part is we have all the names of those that got in line for the free pardon, a precious pardon, which is never heard of before they made it up like they do everything when they’re cheating

Expand full comment
Stone Raven's avatar

🥾GITMO on one way tickets! Go go go!!

Expand full comment