21 Comments
User's avatar
Terry Wears's avatar

Excellent if sobering analysis.

This is indeed the playbook , but god willing we will find a way!

Expand full comment
Mark S Cregan's avatar

The House of Representatives could take 2 actions to address this issue. First, it could defund the position of activist judges (close those courts). This would require some RINO's to be strong armed and the Epstein files and other material already in the hands of the Feds could be used to good purpose here. Second, all the courts could be move out of blue zones to mixed or red zones, ideally out of large metropolitan areas which stacks jury pools. Sell the courthouses that are closed and build new ones that are not imposing structures but resemble warehouses with a bench, tables and chairs, aka: cheap. Judges looking for a job with amenities like fancy restaurants would need to settle for Crackerbarrel, Red Lobster and other chain food outlets. That would be a big incentive not to apply for the position.

Expand full comment
Political Moonshine's avatar

Unfortunately, federal judges are the isolated problem; not so much juries, and those federal judges are appointed for life by presidents. Relocating a court's physical location in no way will dissuade these types of people from accepting nominations and sliding onto the bench in service to their principals.

Expand full comment
Mark S Cregan's avatar

I take your points. Still, changing the current conditions is like eating an apple: just take one bite at a time. Consider that each justices' wife will have varying degrees of unhappiness. The saying of unhappy wife, unhappy life will apply to several cases and thus incremental change is achieved.

Plus the economic benefit to the old location is diminished with each courthouse removed. The misallocated Federal money trickles out to the surrounding power structure at a reduced rate which hampers their ability for mischief. And the knock on effect of the support businesses (plumbers, electricians, waiters, law firms etc.) is a mild punishment for blue zone behavior. Some effects are larger than others but a trend reversal starts to be achieved (hopefully). And red/mixed zones get a mild pickup in economic activity.

Outright closing of some courts would be my preferred action. Maybe DOGE will take this up and run with it.

Expand full comment
BKBlair's avatar

According to a constitutional attorney, judges do not have lifetime appointments.

"Supreme Court Justices DO NOT have life time appointments. Pursuant to Art III section 1 Supreme Court Justices hold office for “good behavior” and are to be IMPEACHED if they conduct themselves otherwise."

https://www.krisannehall.com/2014/09/23/justice-ginsburg-articles-impeachment/

When a judge (federal, state, or local) violates their oath of office or the judicial code of ethics they may be impeached or removed from their seat.

Impeachment:

https://www.krisannehall.com/2021/01/24/the-precedent-for-post-office-impeachment/

44 must be impeached. This would negate all the appointments during his administration.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

I like cracker barrel.

Expand full comment
ALtab's avatar

I’m chuckling at the vision, but this is a GREAT idea! Bravo.👏

Expand full comment
Anne Lewis's avatar

Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never — in nothing, great or small, larger petty — never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. — Winston Churchill

We can go around or under or backward. We can decide that momentum and momentum are not mutually exclusive — we can keep going, advancing, even if we’ve been stopped in one particular direction. — Ryan Holiday

Ignore the noise, think outside the box, pray for wisdom, strength of character and resolve, the unveiling of evil, and the return of God’s blessings upon our nation as we return to Him.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

We need to do what the Dems did under Biden. This is safety for out country's children. People call it honor, or not honor, if they wish. For this particular problem, I don't care.

Expand full comment
ALtab's avatar

He has worked many miracles for His people and they’ve always been the underdogs. Many have been uniquely gifted with the specific qualities required in this war. As Joe Kronner reminds us, ‘God Wins.’ We will not give up.🙏

Expand full comment
Trumpeter's avatar

Find the money. Which judges have been taking money, or their family has, without revealing it. Judges get a salary so that they are independent for their term. It's in the constitution! If they are taking outside money, it is by definition corrupt! It can be stopped and this is a lever on the judges impartiality.

Sign an executive order declaring that obvious signs of corruption of more than 10% of judges will render judges unfit and unable to fairly and independently judge the judiciary. Therefore when the threshold has been reached, those judges found accepting outside payments without public declaration will arrested and transported to Gitmo for military tribunal.

Executive order to remain secret until threshold is reached. Punishment from 2 to 10 years based on amount of money involved and whether complete restitution is made. Judges who took money, didn't declare it and acted in the interests of the funders or involved themselves in public policy to be EXECUTED!

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

So what is the solution for an already battle-weary Republic? We've won the battle (the election) but the war wages on...

Expand full comment
Political Moonshine's avatar

Excellent question....

Expand full comment
Daddy Cool's avatar

Thanks to the "Special Operation" in your country since 2015, your corrupt judges have been cornered, and the plan is to expose them legally. They do not realise that military law is separate from federal law, particularly when a National Emergency is proclaimed (E.g. Covid 19 & Trump Executive Orders), and your National Guard is mobilised/federalised as it is now and has been since March & April 2020.

Therefore, it is a time of war. As written in your Constitution under Article 1 Section 9 Clause 2 --"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, UNLESS when in cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." DJT Executive Order 13784, 13773 & 13863 are already targeting transnational crime syndicates....

The corrupt judges think they can throw spanners into the works of DJT by countering his orders and using the Constitution, BUT military law is currently in place. Your Constitution has been suspended since 2020. And foreign criminals in your country will continue to be removed, and legitimately. Congratulations!

Expand full comment
Burnt taco's avatar

Congress has been compromised by the CIA and FBI - unless Trump exposes them all first! Light up the backdoor grifting through those NGOs and investigate every multimillionaire member of congress. Twist them into the sun to vote a change. Extortion works both ways

Expand full comment
Tom Karnes's avatar

Lock up the entire Supreme Court in Gitmo, lock up every member of Congress accept 1, put all public/Private partnerships back into the public domain, call for new elections and Trumps head will be carved in Mt. Rushmore

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Couldn't Tom Homan just put the picked up gang members and fly them out at night, regardless of what is happening in the Judiciary? This is what the Democrats did. They first do what they want and then later slide past any issues brought. Trump would not be forced to take the gangs back from El Salvador. We have the DOJ. Can't our DOJ just not prosecute Homan? That's exactly what the Democrats did for 4 years.

Expand full comment
Dennis K McGee's avatar

I'm not ready to throw in the towel. It's very early days.

Expand full comment
Sub Presser's avatar

One serious aspect here is that Justice Roberts is beholden to Obama if it’s true, hard to get this investigated, that the adoption of Roberts’ two children from Ireland was illegal and signed off on by Obama, their little secret that keeps the Supreme Court justice firmly in the Democrat camp in difficult cases, until this dirt and corruption can be uprooted. We know who has been playing this game big time while president. And now, the activist judges are being used to destroy the president in the same manner that they were used to take out the former president, Jair Bolsanero, in Brazil. We pray that they will fail.

Expand full comment
ALtab's avatar

‘In other words, it’s a constitutional crisis.’

Now, how many of these judges, up to Justice Roberts, have been involved in the elites’ love of children? How many in Congress have been involved with NGOs and other parts of laundering campaign funds, or kickbacks from influence peddling? The best way to return to the rule of law is to expose it ALL! The elections must be fixed, and the corruption completely exposed.

It is a Constitutional crisis. It’s a moral crisis, too. We’ve known this and any good operation plan has countermeasure and countermoves to each action and reaction.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 22
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Kash?

Expand full comment