As a friend of mine, with considerable combat time as a sniper recently pointed out, he would be peeking out the side of, or over the top, not standing in front of, the tank vent.
We have a Subaru, and a van with AZ plates both parked either 1 to 10 miles from the rally, depending on who is reporting.
We have a bicycle (used for final approach) with a 5ft(?) Home Depot ladder, a rifle (from parents), a (golfing?) rangefinder (used to scope USSS counter-snipers as they scoped the promary), and now a drone, used mere hours prior to the speech...
It is almost as if his handlers instructed Crooks to be conspicuously obvious...
Yeah, that was supposedly his van, towed away by PD, but he also drove a Hyundai Subaru and rode a bicycle. With a rifle, his drone and his rangefinder and no ladder, as now the MSM says there was no ladder.
Excellent coverage. I stress that we are in the Intelligence gathering phase, and extrapolating threads to investigate.
Each line of inquiry should be evaluated, and if dismissed, still documented not only for reference ,but shelved to be picked back up based on new discovery and renewed relevance.
The value of intelligence is directly proportional to its improbability and it is time perishable.
As a retired veteran who gave his entire youth to service in uniform, I am mortified ,and angry as hell, at the toxic-cesspool the federal government has become. This trash is NOT the American Experiment.
For anyone interested in pursuing more on the excellent Bush timeline Political Moonshine presents here, I recommend the following corroborating researchers:
• Elizabeth The Punisher Dove's Newsletter - substack (Wormscan Files)
• BADLANDS MEDIA Who ls The Real Enemy? By JOE LANGE - substack
Thank you. I have a little job coming up in the next couple weeks, when I get 2 shekels ahead, I'm gonna support you and Moonshine. You're the best, by far.
I have seen schematics of where the two teams of USSS snipers were stationed during Trump’s speech, and I have read that one of the snipers on the south roof behind the podium was responsible for the shot that took out Crooks. It was the north team that has repeatedly been shown in photos, including the sniper with the tattoos on his left arm.
There were supposed to be two additional sniper teams from the Pennsylvania State Police, but I have seen no photos or schematics of where they were stationed or supposed to be stationed during the speech. The second story windows of the building attached to Crooks’ building makes a lot of sense to me. It is consistent with LEOs being “inside the building,” as some have claimed, but not on roof tops, where one would assume they would be.
And that water tower. I can't let that go. There is no other place with higher overwatch priority, period.
It would be secured at the very least, used as overwatch as best, and especially as a honeypot for counter-operations by clever security measures.
Where do you set up defensive overwatch? If only there was a tower nearby.
Supposedly, the Jumbotron would have obscured the view from the water tower to where Trump was standing while speaking.
Also, defensive overwatch doesn't need eyes on the asset, but rather field of view for areas obscured to said asset being supported.
As a friend of mine, with considerable combat time as a sniper recently pointed out, he would be peeking out the side of, or over the top, not standing in front of, the tank vent.
And that only as overwatch not aggressor.
That makes sense.
To be fair, the water tower for a bad actor Infiltrator would be amateurish, but still a necessity for security or compromised security overwatch.
Even without the Jumbotron, the angles for a shooter there don't match the data we have.
Right. By the way, do we have the angle(s) for Crooks being shot? Any word on the retrieval of bullets? Casings?
https://rumble.com/v57pbxm-second-shooter-john-cullen-tpc-1531.html
Interesting hypothesis ~22m into vid
NADA..🕵♂️
Is it possible the one that hit DJT had an upward trajectory? Tore mentioned it and so did Spookd.
That would be the window below Crooks, althought the trajectory of the 1st couple of shots fits that 2nd story window best.
At this point, we can say shots came from either inside the building below Crook's or that 2nd story window, in addition to the roof.
Aside from that, we have several other shots from undetermined origin. At least one shot came from farther away that the building though
We have a Subaru, and a van with AZ plates both parked either 1 to 10 miles from the rally, depending on who is reporting.
We have a bicycle (used for final approach) with a 5ft(?) Home Depot ladder, a rifle (from parents), a (golfing?) rangefinder (used to scope USSS counter-snipers as they scoped the promary), and now a drone, used mere hours prior to the speech...
It is almost as if his handlers instructed Crooks to be conspicuously obvious...
I did not know about the Arizona plates.
Yeah, that was supposedly his van, towed away by PD, but he also drove a Hyundai Subaru and rode a bicycle. With a rifle, his drone and his rangefinder and no ladder, as now the MSM says there was no ladder.
Fog of war.
and explosives
Greatgameindia.com
Excellent coverage. I stress that we are in the Intelligence gathering phase, and extrapolating threads to investigate.
Each line of inquiry should be evaluated, and if dismissed, still documented not only for reference ,but shelved to be picked back up based on new discovery and renewed relevance.
The value of intelligence is directly proportional to its improbability and it is time perishable.
As a retired veteran who gave his entire youth to service in uniform, I am mortified ,and angry as hell, at the toxic-cesspool the federal government has become. This trash is NOT the American Experiment.
I am seeing an increased pursuit of multiple shooters, but this could be a red herring. I do not believe so at this time, but it cannot be dismissed.
I have been out of pocket recently, most recently due to leading Disaster Recovery for a global financial Fortune 500 company impacted by Crowdstrike.
For anyone interested in pursuing more on the excellent Bush timeline Political Moonshine presents here, I recommend the following corroborating researchers:
• Elizabeth The Punisher Dove's Newsletter - substack (Wormscan Files)
• BADLANDS MEDIA Who ls The Real Enemy? By JOE LANGE - substack
• SpookdBlog CIA vs DIA - website
https://substack.com/@shanghaimoon/note/c-55319358?r=1lcdri
THANK YOU!
Always looking for substacks to get at the truth!
I keep seeing the name Austin Private Wealth LLC - some have debunked, some have not. I'm not remotely a finance person so I can't comment:
https://t.me/TrumpShootingArchive/572
Amazing.
News to me. Pittsburg police injured? Sure would like to get more info on that.
https://x.com/In2ThinAir/status/1814731125400506543
not discussing injuries though
Thank you. I wasn’t able to make much out of that. Untrained ear. ‘Preciate the effort.
Usual PD or Military radio chatter
I will keep an eye out for the PD talking about officers hit by shrapnel. It was on X a couple of days ago.
If I recall correctly, PD was being interviewed by local TV station.
Thank you. I have a little job coming up in the next couple weeks, when I get 2 shekels ahead, I'm gonna support you and Moonshine. You're the best, by far.
Motives $$$$$$ power lead from behind
I have seen schematics of where the two teams of USSS snipers were stationed during Trump’s speech, and I have read that one of the snipers on the south roof behind the podium was responsible for the shot that took out Crooks. It was the north team that has repeatedly been shown in photos, including the sniper with the tattoos on his left arm.
There were supposed to be two additional sniper teams from the Pennsylvania State Police, but I have seen no photos or schematics of where they were stationed or supposed to be stationed during the speech. The second story windows of the building attached to Crooks’ building makes a lot of sense to me. It is consistent with LEOs being “inside the building,” as some have claimed, but not on roof tops, where one would assume they would be.
This is interesting too
https://x.com/mjtruthultra/status/1814395746994552975?s=42&t=ga75MGxcGcTkkROxm43I-g
Yep, another thread
Influencewatch.org Search Blackberry AI
https://open.substack.com/pub/gregreese/p/evidence-of-multiple-shooters-at?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1lcdri
Just hit my feed from the Reese Report
Evidence suggesting it was likely 3 assailants.
Influencewatch.org Search Trump Shot
"World War I kicked off by means of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand."
Um, we need to learn more about what really started WW1. Russia was seeking a water port that did not freeze in the winter months. Those with interest in keeping Russia from expanding did not want that to happen. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/warm-water-port.htm
Are people really falling for this nonsense?