I am currently thinking the echo displacement of the 2nd burst of shots was Crooks. The echos from the 1st set and 2nd set match from audio at the target, but deviate from the 2nd track of adjacent audio, this difference in echoes suggesting different, albeit close, proximity.
My second thought is, forensics would have recovered some of the bullets (from victims if nowhere else) AND would have recovered brass.
I have seen no mention of any recovered brass to date.
Basic forensics (something that I have personally done), much like basic sniper overwatch.
The narrative doesn't hold water.
FYI, I handled evidence from the Twin Towers, post 9/11 (not what was publicly released) and fire debris from the Branch Davidians (also including what was not publicly released).
To clarify, I think the first set were bad actor alphabet nearby Crooks (the window, either 1st or 2nd floor) and the 2nd set, of wild shots, were Crooks.
Outstanding work. Now I can go tell my neighbors and friends what's logically known of what's happened. It's important. Likely to get a chance to meet our local Sheriff tomorrow and press moving forward with local political action. It's important. The war is ongoing. Many too many are still unaware it's happening, but progress is being made. Your work here is absolutely invaluable as a principal countermeasure. It's information warfare and you are the biggest gun I know of. Thanks.
A sniper has to consider wind velocity and direction, lighting, distance, his own breathing, hand movement, and weapon recoil before considering a shot. Why would he choose to take his shot during the FEW MINUTES that his target was referring to a chart placed to his right, necessitating that he move his head back and forth? Having taken the shot, a sniper doesn't stick around to watch the outcome, he gets the hell out of there. Our sniper continued to shoot - and miss - after his target was down. Does this indicate an emotional attachment to the outcome?
Thanks for the shout out brother!
I am currently thinking the echo displacement of the 2nd burst of shots was Crooks. The echos from the 1st set and 2nd set match from audio at the target, but deviate from the 2nd track of adjacent audio, this difference in echoes suggesting different, albeit close, proximity.
My second thought is, forensics would have recovered some of the bullets (from victims if nowhere else) AND would have recovered brass.
I have seen no mention of any recovered brass to date.
Basic forensics (something that I have personally done), much like basic sniper overwatch.
The narrative doesn't hold water.
FYI, I handled evidence from the Twin Towers, post 9/11 (not what was publicly released) and fire debris from the Branch Davidians (also including what was not publicly released).
To clarify, I think the first set were bad actor alphabet nearby Crooks (the window, either 1st or 2nd floor) and the 2nd set, of wild shots, were Crooks.
I would contest that presumption of a one in a million shot.
For the untrained, yes, that would be an amazing shot, but for anyone trained, at that distance, sub 1 moa is to be expected.
That range is still within pistol range, and professional training includes targets partially concealed behind a hostage (or roof peak in this case).
100% agree that Tony Seruga needs to be vetted and that outside corroboration is required to validate his claims.
As for now, these are hypothesis threads, to be explored and investigated.
Nothing more, nothing less. 😎
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then. Confirmation needed.
Or in Southern Middle Tennessee Speak, even a blind hog'll find and acorn...
Greatgameindia.com lots of information all the time
I saved the link and shared already 😀
Outstanding work. Now I can go tell my neighbors and friends what's logically known of what's happened. It's important. Likely to get a chance to meet our local Sheriff tomorrow and press moving forward with local political action. It's important. The war is ongoing. Many too many are still unaware it's happening, but progress is being made. Your work here is absolutely invaluable as a principal countermeasure. It's information warfare and you are the biggest gun I know of. Thanks.
A sniper has to consider wind velocity and direction, lighting, distance, his own breathing, hand movement, and weapon recoil before considering a shot. Why would he choose to take his shot during the FEW MINUTES that his target was referring to a chart placed to his right, necessitating that he move his head back and forth? Having taken the shot, a sniper doesn't stick around to watch the outcome, he gets the hell out of there. Our sniper continued to shoot - and miss - after his target was down. Does this indicate an emotional attachment to the outcome?
Like clockwork orange sick bastards
Not one American voted for any of this trash 🗑️ fraud one continuous fruadrama
Symbols symbology mystics cults epa CDC all self appointed agencies are from the crown 👑
Tech linguistics symbols will be they're downfall Trump always says that
Influence watch.org search Blackberry AI 👁️ ching Chong Chinamen sitting on a fence trying to make a dollar out of 29 cents
Greatgameindia.com
American report.org should help you guys see our adversaries more clear
Influencewatch.org search Cancel culture
Academia edu.com
AI Blackberry
CCP
State of the nation sotnet Biden ineligible for office court documents