WORLD WAR III: Blinken’s Bridge to Confirmed NATO Membership for Ukraine Forges Path to War
ANALYSIS: NATO confirms Ukraine’s coming membership as US SecState Blinken builds Biden’s bridge to war.
On 19 Dec 20, I put forth analysis indicating a problematic foreign policy decision by the incoming Biden Administration to shift away from an appropriate hyper-focus on China as our primary military, political and economic adversary and to NATO’s favorite “boogeyman” Russia.
In between then and now are nearly 200 articles of intensive war analysis that over a 4-year timeline have accurately projected one development after another; all in the direction of a designed multiple-front third world war and often made years in advance.
This includes Ukraine’s eventual NATO membership, which is a central tenet to the analysis and perhaps the most important finer distinction within it.
GO DEEPER
On the 19 Dec 20 incoming Biden Administration foreign policy shift to Russia: From 2020 Foreign Policy Shift to WWIII in 2024 Biden Marches Us to War
At the beginning of April, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stood beside Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kulbea to discuss a potentially expedited timeline for Ukraine’s membership in NATO where both men spoke [featured below.]
Before that in mid-July 2023 at the NATO summit in Vilnius, Ukraine’s NATO membership was a contentious topic and it was pushed to the back burner for reasons centering on Ukraine’s lack of readiness.
The mid-July 2023 remarks out of the NATO summit were more pretext designed to stir the geopolitical war pot while providing the talking points to which they will point backwards.
The joint Blinken-Kulbea statement indicated that we were moving closer to backwards pointing time.
It also means that the projected timeline for a kinetic flashpoint for a third world war remains on a very accurate trajectory [discussed below].
On 29 Apr 24, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg visited Kyiv where NATO reports that, “On membership, Mr Stoltenberg said: “Ukraine’s rightful place is in NATO. Ukraine will become a member of NATO. The work we are undertaking now puts you on an irreversible path towards NATO membership, so that when the time is right, Ukraine can become a NATO member straightaway.””
*Link
Stoltenberg went on to reference NATO’s July meeting – the same aforementioned back burner meeting from 2023 – as a future working ground towards the Ukraine objective further stating that, “Moscow must understand: they cannot win. And they cannot wait us out.”
Remember how nice things were when President Trump avoided war altogether, put China on a short leash and normalized relations with Putin and Russia for four “mostly peaceful” years?
Stoltenberg’s remarks provide us further confirmation on evidenced projections [article continues after GO DEEPER].
GO DEEPER
On the mid-July 2023 developments of Ukraine’s NATO membership [understanding that this is but a portion of the analysis on the topic]:
TIMING MATTERS: At the exact time of the mid-July 2023 consideration of Ukraine’s NATO membership, US AG Merrick Garland and the DOJ became actively engaged in what the analysis identified as international cover-up operations of criminality in Ukraine most notably from Joe Biden [Burisma bears down] at the same time that former President Donald Trump was indicted again in “look here, don’t look here” fashion:
02 Aug 23: TRUMP INDICTMENT: Another Day, Another Trump Indictment, Another Step Closer to Full Communism
23 Mar 24: THE UNTOUCHABLES: Bidens, Burisma and the Intelligence Community
The analysis here dismissed the lack of readiness angle and identified what is the more plausible reason for Ukraine’s NATO apparently expedited membership, which I outlined in the 09 Jul 23 article above and have revisited countless times.
The identified position on Ukraine’s NATO membership was framed by ongoing geopolitical dialogue centered on the provision of controversial cluster bombs to Ukraine for the US/NATO proxy war against Russia.
From that dialogue comes our position and it was nothing new at the time; in fact, 128 existing articles of analysis directly supported it:
Rep. Michael McCaul, R-TX is a clear NATO/MIC/intelligence community asset otherwise the 10-term Congressman would not have chaired the House Committee on Homeland Security nor would he be positioned to currently chair the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
McCaul was clearly dispatched to push cluster bombs but it’s his remarks on Ukraine’s NATO membership that are most problematic.
When viewing McCaul’s statement that admitting Ukraine as a NATO member “would immediately put us at war with Russia” against the backdrop of Biden’s statement that Ukraine is not ready to become a NATO member, we see the creation of a geopolitical “switch.”
The “switch” becomes one that Biden can flip at a moment of his choosing [or more accurately, the people behind Biden] to further escalate the Russian front in the pending multiple-front war with Russia and China.
According to McCaul, all Biden has to do is give his blessing for NATO’s membership and at that moment, the “switch” is flipped to give the establishment the war they so badly desire and need.
It should be noted that Ukraine’s NATO membership is a longstanding marker event in my multiple-front war analysis and this makes the combined McCaul/Biden remarks and the resulting “switch” as potentially deadly as they are problematic.
As soon as the Ukraine/Russia front goes kinetic, the analysis holds that Beijing will immediately move on Taiwan to open the second front with China.
Allow the 2024 election to bear down with a very plausible scenario of suspended elections due to war.
The analysis holds that this would be the final stages of overthrow, handover and conversion to Marxist communism.
THE TAKEAWAY from that Moonshine extract is the concept of creating a geopolitical “switch” to trigger a multiple-front war in three specific theaters in the sequence laid-out: Russia/Ukraine, China/Taiwan/South China Sea and the Middle East/Syria/Iran.
To kick a dead horse and in case it isn’t patently obvious, the analysis holds that Biden’s designed NATO encroachment on Russia provides a literal “switch” to trigger war and that “switch” is Ukraine’s NATO membership.
To varying degrees, the other two theaters [CHN/TWN, ME] are already active and the long-established kinetic flashpoint for World War III is Syria as a proxy nuclear missile developer for Iran, which is in alignment with both Russia and China.
Overlay the engineered Hamas/Israel matter knowing that Hamas is an Iranian proxy front and the protests we are seeing across the US, which are manufactured dissent mostly from protestors paid by George Soros’ network of NGOs who couldn’t find Gaza on a map, and we have the necessary entanglements to spark war in the Middle East vis-a-vis Iran and other things, like Russia’s long-tenured diplomatic relationship with Syria and China’s increasing influence in the region.
*Link
A cascade of paralleling events in service to one another could plausibly spark out of Hamas/Israel to kick-start the Middle East as preceded by or subsequent to Ukraine’s NATO membership, which is certain to result in Russian countermeasures against NATO targets in the region as Russia has already placed those cards onto the table.
As soon as Russia/Ukraine goes fully kinetic with the US, Beijing will move on Taiwan where despite contradicting statements out of the Biden Administration, longstanding diplomatic ties and an informal defense agreement with Taiwan would drag us into the third now active theater.
GO DEEPER
On the importance of Iran: WHY IRAN MATTERS: Biden’s Foreign Policy on Iran Is the Path to War
Within all of that is the ability of Biden to flip the Ukraine “switch” at the moment of his choosing and that moment is guaranteed to be calibrated to the 2024 electoral timeline because those are the overarching plans of the controlling entity, the Intelligence Community.
Biden [the Intelligence Community] can flip the “switch,” wait a few months to let matters develop knowing full well that Putin will respond – he already did in February 2022 with a “special security operation” to de-Nazify the region and counter a wide swath of NATO facilities that include over 40 US Department of Defense biolabs in Ukraine – and Biden gets what he wants: more “Russian aggression.”
In actuality, any such “Russian aggression” is actually an appropriate Russian response to the continued and ongoing US/NATO aggression, to which Biden will later point to justify even further manufactured atrocities.
Therein we have the escalating and incremental catalyst for World War III functioning like a “switch.”
Here, Blinken and Kulbea discuss it:
*Link
Understand that this is the equivalent of an inverted Cuban missile crisis exponentially more problematic and dangerous.
In this case; however, the position of Putin and Russia is painted as villainous and warmongering rather than appropriate, like in 1962 and into 1963 when the US responded to Russian encroachment and then the Intelligence Community eliminated the impediment of President John F. Kennedy.
The result was the ‘Dynastic Bush’ political continuum.
GO DEEPER
On ‘Dynastic Bush’: War, Oil and Omicron – Then, Now and Trump: Part III – Dynastic Bush
In October 2022, I said this:
The entire premise that America is being drawn into a multiple-front war scenario with a designed loss derived from Chinese proxy Joe Biden’s stewardship draws back to March of 2021. The analysis includes nuclear vectors and that linked research should be consumed for full and accurate understanding.
Suffice it to say that when Biden issues statements promising a nuclear Armageddon and he does this after multiple deliberate statements over time about a ‘dark winter’, everyone should take notice.
Most concerning is how this multiple-front scenario is unpacking exactly as projected and backed by evidence. The nuclear threat is a real one. Take Biden at his world.
President Joe Biden said on Thursday [06 Oct 22] that the threat of nuclear “Armageddon” is at its highest level since the Cuban missile crisis, and that the US is trying to find an “off-ramp” for Russia before they begin the use of tactical nuclear weapons. [1]Zero Hedge
“We’re trying to figure out what is Putin’s off-ramp? Where does he get off? Where does he find a way out?” Biden said at a fundraiser in New York City for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee at the New York home of James Murdoch, the son of News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch. [1]Zero Hedge
Not uncharacteristically for the feeble-minded Biden whose statements are frequently walked back by his Administration’s public relations guardrails, his claims of a nuclear Armageddon were not accompanied with any evidence of reliable intelligence. [2]
The Intelligence Community has designed Ukraine’s NATO membership as a “switch” to flip and trigger regional conflict within the designs of a multiple-theater World War III.
About a year ago, NATO pushed Ukraine’s membership to the back burner out of its lack of readiness.
Early last month, the US and Ukraine both put their hand on that “switch.”
Days ago NATO and Stoltenberg promised they’re going to flip it.
If the Intelligence Community finally flips the Ukraine/NATO “switch,” war will be the result and by all indications, it will rise to the level of the third world war in Russia/Ukraine, China/Taiwan/South China Sea and the Middle East/Syria/Iran.
The timeline firmly remains 05 Nov 24 +/- 3 months so, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick……
-End-
GO DEEPER
On the likelihood of a designed and manufactured World War III:
GO DEEPER
On the historical timeline:
The historical timeline underpinning this development is as critical as the development itself, noting that what is presented below is a very small bit of that historical timeline.
A central component to the aggregate analysis was something that began in 1991 with the fall of the former Soviet Union while George H.W. Bush was Vice President to President Ronald Reagan.
Recall that ‘Dynastic Bush’ functionary President Bill Clinton oversaw the 1994 envelopment of Ukraine: “The trilateral discussions accelerated in December, producing the Trilateral Statement and accompanying annex, signed by Kravchuk, Yelstin and U.S. President Bill Clinton in Moscow on January 14, 1994. Those documents provided that Ukraine would transfer all strategic warheads on its territory to Russia for elimination and, in return, would receive security assurances, compensation for the commercial value of the HEU, and Nunn-Lugar assistance to help with the disposal of ICBMs, ICBM silos, bombers and other infrastructure on Ukrainian territory. Perhaps as importantly but less tangibly, the Trilateral Statement removed what would have been a major impediment to Ukraine’s development of normal relations with the United States and the West.” [From my article UNDERSTANDING THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF UKRAINE: Going Deep on Ukraine’s Strategic Importance Reveals That We’re Repeating the History Obama, the Clintons and the Bidens Engineered for Us.]
Clinton was also President when this happened: “Relations and plausible defense obligations escalated with the 1996 Taiwan missile crisis, “The relationship received a boost in the mid-1990s, in the wake of the 1996 missile crisis in the Taiwan Strait which also initiated Taiwan’s current defense reform and transformation. In the same period, the U.S.-Taiwan security assistance and cooperation has been upgraded to an unprecedented level.”“ [From my article RUSSIA, UKRAINE, CHINA and MEDICAL TYRANNY: War, Famine and Disease Are Right On Schedule as Evidenced by Monkeypox, the Food Crisis, Metabiota, Biden Laptop Emails and PDFs from Marco Polo, and Contemporary Headlines.]
Bush was the primary architect for newly constructed lanes permitting the Intelligence Community to interface with, influence and in some regards, control the Executive and the political continuum borne out of it I branded “Dynastic Bush”:
Overtime, the architecture installed by Bush during his tenure as CIA Director, then Vice President and then President is in most respects responsible for the Intelligence Community’s overarching control and influence of the governance of the United States.
This has been the overarching position and the backbone of the analysis and finally, others are beginning to reach the same findings in their analysis:
*Link
In short, the IC is in charge and has been mostly since 1963; although its beginnings were earlier.
This column comes under the heading "all very good but how do we derail this death train"? It's great to map out the history and the attempted direction....BUT without a solution/plan to prevent WWIII, such articles (though great for history & context) leave one disappointed. Pax
.....and who controls the CIA.....